Template:Did you know nominations/Coronation glove

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 18:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Coronation glove

(

)

Crowning of Edward VII, while wearing a white glove on his right hand

... that while they are being crowned, the British monarch wears a single white glove said to be a symbol of purity and integrity? Source: "only one glove, on the right hand, is worn by the Monarch" from: "Queen Elizabeth II's Coronation Glove". Dents. Retrieved 20 April 2023., the timing of the wearing of the glove is covered in Torrance, David. "The coronation: history and ceremonial" (PDF). House of Commons Library. pp. 58–59. Retrieved 20 April 2023. and "According to Thomas Fuller, writing in 1655, the whiteness of the coronation glove is a visual emblem of purity and integrity and a reminder of the virtues of the saintly Edward the Confessor" from: Green, Anne (6 November 2021). Gloves: An Intimate History. Reaktion Books. p. 29. ISBN 978-1-78914-510-6.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Rutherford's Monument
- Comment: Nice if this could run on coronation day (6 May), if needed to save space it could be merged into the multi-article Template:Did you know nominations/Robe of State but I think it has enough interest to stand alone

Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 06:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Coronation glove; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

New enough. Long enough. QPQ done. Hook is interesting enough and checks out. All paragraphs and hook are well-cited. Article has a neutral tone. Earwig found no close paraphrasing, copyright or plagiarism. The 1902 image is old enough for the main page. Fixed a few trivial typos. Good to go. Edwardx (talk) 00:16, 23 April 2023 (UTC)