Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

Template:Did you know nominations/Edward A. Hanna

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 05:30, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Edward A. Hanna

Created by Apocheir (talk). Self-nominated at 01:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC).

  • The full review is to follow, but among the hooks proposed so far I think ALT3 is the most intriguing option here despite being the longest. However, maybe it's just me missing direct mentions, but what's the sentence that mentions that he wanted to close down the city government? In addition, per WP:DYKCRIT a footnote must be located at the end of every sentence that supports a hook fact, and the sentence about him wanting to eliminate the Assembly is lacking such a footnote. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
    • The relevant sentences in the article are He advocated for the elimination of the assembly, making New York a unicameral legislature. and He spoke of wanting to eliminate city government entirely. Both now have a sentence citation instead of a paragraph citation. Apocheir (talk) 21:23, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarifications. My spot check does show that the article meets requirements and a QPQ has been done. I also didn't find any close paraphrasing. The hooks are now okay and I'd reiterate my preference for ALT3. However, due to real-life busyness and the length of the article I can no longer commit to a full check of the article so I'd like to ask for help from a new reviewer to sign this off. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:56, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Starting review. Zeete (talk) 13:51, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
  • Review: New (moved to main space January 11), long enough (18,132 per DYK check, a few long quotes), cited, neutral, Earwig reported Violation Unlikely (21.3%, due to quotations), QPQ done, hooks interesting, length checked ok. Also prefer hook ALT3.
  • Good to go. Thanks, Zeete (talk) 14:25, 2 February 2023 (UTC)