Template:Did you know nominations/Right to vote in Singapore law

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 10:00, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Right to vote in Singapore law

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the right to vote is not expressly stated in Singapore's Constitution, but in a 2009 parliamentary debate the Government said it could be inferred from the Constitution's terms?

• Reviewed: List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Kapil Dev.
• Comment: The article was moved from a sandbox on 8 March 2012. The hook is referenced by footnotes 20 and 21 in the section "Government's view".

Created/expanded by Ahmadfirdausdaud (talk), Mcangela.2010 (talk), Xiangchew (talk). Nominated by Smuconlaw (talk) at 08:57, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

• All checks out. Perhaps you might want to shorten the hook to something like ALT1: "... that the right to vote is not expressly stated in Singapore's Constitution"? I think it might catch more viewers' attention this way.--Lionratz (talk) 04:20, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks! As for the hook, I'm happy either way. I'll leave it to the DYK volunteer to pick the hook. — SMUconlaw (talk) 11:04, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Recommend ALT1 as hook.--Lionratz (talk) 12:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)