The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Created by Hanjaf1 (talk). Self-nominated at 17:40, 17 July 2021 (UTC).
Comment I don't think the first or third hooks are appropriate. For 1: it is a primary source. We need a secondary source to say that Covar is "one of the first ways to measure the risk that the financial system could collapse". For 3: The source does not say that the monthly recession indicator is derived from Adrian's work. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:18, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
For the first hook, perhaps this is preferable: Hanjaf1 (talk) 16:58, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
That's much better than ALT1 about digital currencies, which is essentially "OPINION... according to person," and which I strongly oppose. DS (talk) 03:21, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:50, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
Interesting:
QPQ: None required.
Overall: Article is long, was new and is well sourced. It used to have a primary sources tag but it looks like the sources have been fixed. I removed the tag since the only primary source is an interview (and it's properly used). Assuming good faith on a paywalled source. I agree with the above commenters that ALT3 is the best one. Striking the others for not being neutral or well sourced. The qpq isn't done yet since the nominator/reviewer still has to respond there. Once qpq is provided, I'll approve ALT3. Scratch that, qpq isn't necessary since this is a first time dyk nomination. (@Hanjaf1: it would be really cool if you could finish the review though :p) BuySomeApples (talk) 04:17, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:50, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Article is long, was new and is well sourced. It used to have a primary sources tag but it looks like the sources have been fixed. I removed the tag since the only primary source is an interview (and it's properly used). Assuming good faith on a paywalled source. I agree with the above commenters that ALT3 is the best one. Striking the others for not being neutral or well sourced.