The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
I'll review this. QPQ checks out, article length and newness of 5x expansion checks out. I don't see any issues with the article; it's well sourced and generally well put-together. The hook is interesting, but I feel it could be phrased a little more clearly; what about something along the lines of "...British Indian civil servant Winter Renouf advocated for Canadian wheat to be grown in Punjab?"Generalissima (talk) 04:33, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. I chose that wording because he was a Briton in India, not a British Indian. As for the remainder of the hook, in all honesty, I prefer the original which was carefully worded in order to avoid ambiguity. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:39, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Just drop the "in India" phrase, it's obvious already from the mention of the Punjab. Gatoclass (talk) 14:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
I think I still prefer the original... but ALT1 ... that British civil servant, Winter Renouf, thought that farmers in the Punjab should grow Canadian wheat varieties?Philafrenzy (talk) 22:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
I'll review this. QPQ checks out, article length and newness of 5x expansion checks out. I don't see any issues with the article; it's well sourced and generally well put-together. The hook is interesting, but I feel it could be phrased a little more clearly; what about something along the lines of 
ALT2 verified. Gatoclass (talk) 11:55, 24 January 2024 (UTC)