This template is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
London is just too big for one template, so I've refocussed this one on the City of London. A template can also be created for each London borough. There are categories currently being created (such as Category:Churches in Camden) which will help with this. MRSC • Talk15:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
But you left the old template in over 50 articles, many of which are not in the City of London. Whether this was messiness or laziness, it was highly undesirable. I am reverting the move and content back then recreating the focused Template:Churches in the City of London. If you disagree, then please discuss it and get a consensus. --Rumping (talk) 00:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]