Template talk:First Nations Australians

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Australia: Indigenous peoples

	Australia portal First Nations Australians is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
	This template is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia.

Ethnic groups

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Discrimination

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles

Countering systemic bias

This template is supported by the Countering systemic bias WikiProject, which provides a central location to counter systemic bias on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.Countering systemic biasWikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic biasTemplate:WikiProject Countering systemic biasCountering systemic bias articles

Basic Information

When making any changes please refer back to '''The Australian Government Style Manual'''[https://www.stylemanual.gov.au/accessible-and-inclusive-content/inclusive-language/aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-peoples] as it is the most recently updated.

If you find a source better than the Australian Government, then please start a discussion. AverageFraud (talk) 10:37, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Length of Template

If anyone would like to assist by making subsections of the template collapsible that would be great. This is so that the template doesn't become too long.

I will be looking into how to do this as well. AverageFraud (talk) 10:48, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image

If anyone can find an appropriate image that would be helpful, I was thinking of including both the Aboriginal Flag and the Torres Strait Islander Flag but decided against it. AverageFraud (talk) 10:50, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blak

I believe that we should mention the usage of Blak somewhere in this Terminology Guide

SMH and SBS have articles about it's usage.

The National Museum of Australia has used Blak to refer to First Nations Australians.

Monash University also had a panel discussing Blak design.

There also exists Sydney Festival’s Blak Out.

If anyone has some suggestions on how this should be implemented please discuss.

Thanks,

AverageFraud (talk) 07:58, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

'non-Indigenous', 'non-indigenous', 'other Australians', 'the wider community'

I am undecided on what tern should be used: 'non-Indigenous', 'non-indigenous', 'other Australians', 'the wider community'

Does anyone have any recommendations/suggestions?

Thanks,

AverageFraud (talk) 08:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hold your horses!

I have a lot of dealings with Aboriginal people, and personally regard "First Nations" as a recent, and not yet well established, name for Australia's indigenous peoples.

There is no way it should be become the primary term used in Wikipedia at this stage.

The term came here only recently from Canada, where it is definitely the primary term. It's also strong in the USA, but seems to share a place with "Native Americans". But that doesn't mean we should blindly and unthinkingly change our usage here in Australia. HiLo48 (talk) 22:29, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will no longer be making any changes to any other Australian articles.

My understanding was that in general the Australian Government Style Manual would be the best source and the standard on the correct terminology.

At what "stage" should it become the "primary" term? Is there a process that you recommend? A statistic? A survey? When is it established? How does it become established?

I provided the Australian Government Style Manual as the source on the correct terminology, and you are saying it's not established?

As stated, 'Indigenous' although in common use, many First Nations Australians feel that the term was placed on them as well. So I don't understand how your reasoning is different from mine?

Thanks,

AverageFraud (talk) 00:13, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I believe the Australian Government Style Manual is wrong. My reasons are above. I will add that something coming from academia via Canberra is never guaranteed to reflect an on-the-ground reality across all of a country as large and diverse as Australia. Your question "At what "stage" should it become the "primary" term?" seems to tell us you believe it will. That's fortune telling. We don't do that here. How can "First Nation", obviously a recently imported term, be more acceptable than "Indigenous", an old, well established, English word with, as far as I am aware, no negative connotations? HiLo48 (talk) 10:55, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your input, HiLo48. I understand that "First Nations" is a more recent term and may not yet be widely used in Australia. However, I believe it is important to respect the preferences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, and to use terms that are appropriate and respectful. The Australian Government Style Manual states that "First Nations Australians" is a preferred term, and I think it is important to follow guidelines like this to ensure that we are using language that is respectful and inclusive. I understand that there may be different opinions on this issue, and I am open to hearing other perspectives. Is there any specific guidance or resources that you would recommend for determining appropriate terminology to use when writing about Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples? AverageFraud (talk) 00:06, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AIATSIS Guide

Would it be worth adding some resources for potential article improvement? The AIATSIS Guide to evaluating and selecting education resources page has some information that could be useful. Jimmyjrg (talk) 04:12, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please. Anything that helps improve Australian articles. AverageFraud (talk) 22:23, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This might also be useful to look at as a guide for people adding First Nations content: First Nations Cultural and Intellectual Property in the Arts from the Australia Council for the Arts. It's 196 pages but offers guidance around Indigenous IP which could be very relevant to Wiki projects. Jimmyjrg (talk) 04:25, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]