Template talk:Law & Order (franchise)

Template

I changed the template. It looks better this way.--Kross | Talk 03:56, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Added Conviction

I added the new series "Conviction" to the list, even though it's not exactly a spinoff, it is however, part of the L&O universe, so it should be added, any thoughts?

I removed it. Conviction was by very conscious intention not branded as an L&O show, so while it may belong in the L&O universe it is not a franchise show. It should properly be placed in the 'related shows' subsection, and I have done so. Threephi 06:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. By being part of the L&O Universe, it is inherently part of the franchise. If nothing else, it should be listed with Exiled and Crime and Punishment. I would note that Crime and Punishment is much farther out than Conviction from the core L&O. 66.191.144.82 06:51, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitrary Placement?

The placement of this template on the relavent pages seems to be rather random. I think we should move them all to be right under the infobox, (or if no infobox exists, at the top of the page).--SomeStranger (T | C) 01:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The X-Files

Wouldn't The X-Files be a related series since John Munch appeared in an episode of that series? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.140.57.176 (talk) 01:57, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Post - Personnel?

I must ask how Mike Post came to be listed as personnel. The guy wrote a (good) theme tune and some variations on it. I would say that "personnel" are people who work on the series/franchise on a programme-by-programme basis. I would like to see his name removed from thios template. Any thoughts? TINY MARK 06:01, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]