Template talk:No copyright information
 | This template was considered for merging with Template:Di-no license on 13 August 2011. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
Edit request from Gh87, 13 August 2011
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This template should be merged with {{Di-no license}}. I am hoping for approval since this is fully protected. {{tfm|No copyright information|Di-no license}}
Gh87 (talk) 20:59, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 2 February 2016
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please replace "Category:Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status" with "Category:File deletion templates. This page is a deletion template and not a file. -FASTILY 11:18, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Have moved them to /doc page, where you can edit them. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 21 February 2017
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please wrap the delete link in <span class="sysop-show">...</span> to hide them from non-admins. Pppery 21:49, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Done, and lowered page protection while I was here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 19 June 2018
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
To remove lint errors Misnested tag with different rendering in HTML5 and HTML4 and a stripped tag, please replace template with contents of Template:No copyright information/sandbox. — Anomalocaris (talk) 07:45, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Done Cabayi (talk) 08:16, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 21 November 2020
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The message's wording looks broken with a redundant phrase. The affected message is shown below, with redundancy in boldface:
Unless this information is added to this page, the image will be deleted the image will be deleted after...
