Template talk:Roger Penrose

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

United Kingdom

This template is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom

Expand

I created this template to make navigation around articles on certain physics topics more formalized (fewer 'see also's), but now i see this might work as a general template for Mr penrose, for all his various theories, etc.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:38, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This WorksNavbox is a valuable resource - Penrose books deserve more prise; however it is being displayed on some irrelevant articles (minor issue - no need to fix for now). I am working on a GeneralNavbox for Roger Penrose. Progress is slow - month(s) till completion; but have compiled main information and drafted structure. Also have a new infobox ready for upload. Original idea was a minor addition/improvement to this template (WorksNavbox); but it expanded into full project, so now I am unsure how we should proceed. Might be best to postpone discussion till development is complete, but I wanted to check for your position first. There are three options: (1) incorporate WorksNavbox into new GeneralNavbox; (2) keep both boxes mirroring each other; (3) use two boxes with expanded WorksNavbox supplementing GeneralNavbox. I would strongly recommend (1) and would advice against (2), because of information duplication; while (3) might be a valid option. Anyway, please freely express your opinion, possibly suggesting unlisted options or rejecting idea overall. Also, you might like to check Talk:Roger Penrose and see the proposed complementing infobox here. Fakedeeps (talk) 17:53, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]