Template talk:Stanley Kubrick

	Film portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Photography

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles

No subject

Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb is the official name for the film and that is how it needs to be portrayed. I realize it is, as you put it, a ridiculously long title, but it is the actual title. It is a disservice to shorten it just for the sake of looks. --ScottyBoy900Q 06:35, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Style of Template

I think the version that I changed it to is far better, It's easier to follow, and it's akin to the author template. Because after all, Is not a director akin to an author in terms of film. Who cares if it's a little bigger; its more organized. ...._(Complain)^{(Let us to it pell-mell)} 09:40, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Against! You saved three lines, which were taken up by valuable links to other Stanley Kubrick Films! The previous version by User:thefourdotelipsis did the trick. Revert! Your one true god is David P. A. Hunter, esq. III ^{Talk to me!} 22:29, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion of 'A life in Pictures'

Will my humble motion to include A Life in Pictures in the template be rejected on sight? --Ouro (blah blah) 12:40, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, sounds like a good idea to me. Go for it! Lugnuts (talk) 17:51, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, what do you think? --Ouro (blah blah) 07:29, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fine! Personally, I'd have the last two links on one line, but it's good as it is. Lugnuts (talk) 08:42, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, be freaking bold if you want ;) --Ouro (blah blah) 08:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Lugnuts (talk) 12:17, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. Say, on the other hand, how about puting shorts and productions in one line, and A Life... in a separate last line? Nitpicking. --Ouro (blah blah) 12:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]