User talk:Ivanhenares

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Wikipedia:How to edit a page.
To sign your posts (for eg. on talk pages) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes).
You can experiment in the Sandbox.
For help, see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question.
Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Five pillars, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
You can contribute in many ways: write a great article, fight vandalism, upload pictures, perform maintainance tasks, contribute to existing projects...

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log.

San Fernando City, Pampanga

Please don't copy material from other web sites into Wikipedia unless you are sure that they are in the public domain or the copyright owners have given permission. In the case of San Fernando City, Pampanga, the website http://www.cityofsanfernando.gov.ph/profiles.php includes the message "© City of San Fernando, Pampanga | All Rights Reserved". Please do not remove copyright violation notices from pages without justifying your action on the associated Talk: (Discussion) page or on Wikipedia:Copyright problems. Thanks. --rbrwr ^± 12:54, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I work for the City Government of San Fernando and everything under tourism was written by me. You can see many items in my personal websites. I spent the whole afternoon putting all the information in wikipedia. If it's going to be deleted, nevermind.

Well, OK, that's good. If you own the copyright in the material, just say so on the relevant talk/discussion pages, revert the pages to your versions, and continue editing. If the City owns the copyright (as the copyright notice implied), the question is: are you authorized to license the material on behalf of the City? If so, you can revert and continue as before. If not, get permission to do so from whoever does have that authority before you do so. Thanks. --rbrwr ^± 22:32, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)

It's the other way around, the city asks materials from me. I allow them to use it.

License tagging for Image:Upsilonseal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Upsilonseal.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to Sinulog festival:

Your recent edit to Sinulog festival (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, MySpace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 20:13, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Lazatin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lazatin.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:08, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Famous people or not???

Confusion on the usage of "Famous" refering to people coming from San Fernando. We're not even aware that the aforementioned figures are famous. Somebody rephrase this entry, please? Jeez! They're not even known by our folks here in Pampanga.

Another important thing. Just when did we hear local actress, Judy Ann Santos, coming from our city? She was born in Manila and never raised in San Fernando at all so why should we claim that she hails from our city? Well, ok. Her mom (Mrs. Lumagui) came from Angeles City and San Fernando but it just appears silly and highly insignificant to place her in this entry.

No, her mom is not Kapampangan at all. Her father is Manuel Dayrit Santos of San Fernando, Pampanga. If you don't know who those other people are, you're one of those who don't know your local history and heritage. That's sad. Ivanhenares 15:40, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nicolasa Dayrit

Hi! I noticed that you cited a book as one of your sources for the Nicolasa Dayrit article, but it only has the title and the author's name. Since you have written most of the article yourself, could you please re-write the references a la MLA or APA style? You know, like those bibliographies that you can find near the end of most books, where it includes the publisher's name and also the date and place of publication. By the way, if you are having some more problems with anonymous editors, please let me know and I'll try to help as best as I can. Thanks! =) --- Tito Pao 05:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Tito Pao, I'll rewrite the article and references as soon as I get back home later. It's the biography they use in San Fernando so I might have to edit it. I hope that anonymous contributor stops being anonymous. Thanks! Ivanhenares 19:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Nicolas de Figueroa

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nicolas de Figueroa, by Tomj (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nicolas de Figueroa is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nicolas de Figueroa, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 00:36, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in San Fernando Elementary School

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on San Fernando Elementary School, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because San Fernando Elementary School is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting San Fernando Elementary School, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Upsilonseal.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Upsilonseal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --B (talk) 02:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Old Houses in the Philippines

Category:Old Houses in the Philippines, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 03:53, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Chancerysfp.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:22, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Chonghocktong.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:29, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Consunji.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:07, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Old St. Scholastica's Academy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Old St. Scholastica's Academy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://kapampangan.ivanhenares.com/2005/04/san-fernando-city-rich-in-architectual.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BubbleEngineer (talk) 11:43, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Dayrit02.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Dayrit02.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:27, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Dayrit03.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Dayrit03.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:28, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Dayrit01.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Dayrit01.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:30, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:DayritNicolasa.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:DayritNicolasa.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hizon–Ocampo House for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hizon–Ocampo House is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hizon–Ocampo House until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lenticel ^(talk) 07:53, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]