User talk:Micha

Looking — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.69.11.232 (talk) 05:20, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Micha L. Rieser! I am Pianotech and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Pianotech (talk) 17:38, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Branchiopoda

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:Triops-longicaudatus-dorsal-ventral-edit2.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Makeemlighter (talk) 20:58, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Micha,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Triops-longicaudatus-dorsal-ventral-edit2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 25, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-11-25. —howcheng {chat} 19:18, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Heddal stave church

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, File:Stavechurch-heddal.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:32, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Swiss National Library - your report at WP:AIV

This edit by Mean as custard was not vandalism. On the English Wikipedia, accounts must be for individuals only, who are personally responsible for them, and accounts whose usernames are the names of groups or organizations are not permitted - see WP:GROUPNAME. I have posted advice on User talk:Swiss National Library about how to request a change of username, and explained that a name of the form "Michael at Swiss National Library" is perfectly acceptable, and has the advantage of making the user's affiliation clear. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 12:10, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry that the SNL account was blocked: I think that was a mistake, and the blocking administrator has unblocked to allow a request for change of username. Please do not allow this to discourage you from contributing, but I think you will find that Commons and de-wiki are exceptional in allowing corporate accounts, and you will be better able to contribute across the Wikimedia projects if you use individual user accounts for these GLAM contributions. There would be no problem in your having a separate account "Micha at SNL" if you wanted to keep those contributions separate from contributions under this account. JohnCD (talk) 16:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that is a SUL account of an instituation so we can provide media on commons and the idea was that it is also a single point of contact to the institution. Obviously the english Wikipedia has other ideas how to work with GLAM but actually that doesn't work for the library.--Micha L. Rieser (talk) 16:53, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Let us conduct this conversation at one place rather than three - WT:GLAM, where we are more likely to get input from other interested people. JohnCD (talk) 21:03, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DIscussion at Administrators' noticeboard

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding my block of the User:Swiss National Library account in which I have mentioned you. The thread is "Block review request". Thank you. --JohnCD (talk) 21:36, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another AN discussion

Now there is another discussion at WP:Administrators' noticeboard#Request for unblock: Swiss National Library. JohnCD (talk) 17:57, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this information. --Micha 09:47, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Micha,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Stavechurch-heddal.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 26, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-05-26. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:27, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tarantula

Hi Micha. Thanks for changing incorrect identification. The id was made by a specialist guide at the Asa Wright Nature Centre. I am not a spider expert. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ethorama

Template:Ethorama has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Habsburg Castle illustration

Your illustration in the Habsburg Castle article contains ambiguous sentence fragments such as "1600 still standing." Without some context (absent from the article) it is not clear what you mean, or why the year 1600 is important to the castle. Immediately afterwards you mention that some of the buildings "still exist today", implying that something happened after the year 1600 that destroyed some of the buildings. It also isn't clear whether the buildings marked "1600 in ruins" were destroyed in the year 1600, or in some other year before 1600. jej1997 (talk) 04:56, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The archeological research dated some points in time where they can make certain conclusions about the condition of the castle. Some building of the old castle were then built or were already destroyed. The points in time are: Before 1100, 1100-1250, 1600, today. It is not possible to date it more precisely. - Ex. So some bulidings were built before 1250 but were actually not there anymore after 1600. --Micha 10:59, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. We welcome you to have a look. Feel free to participate.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

Publish an article to the journal.
Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
Apply to become the treasurer of the journal
Join the editorial board.
Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
- Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to updateswijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikaelwikiversityjournal.org.
Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

-from Diptanshu.D (talk · contribs · count) and others of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.

Diptanshu^Talk 10:39, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Micha. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Micha. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]