User talk:Nathan Johnson

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia User:Flyer22.

Hello

I didn't know it was possible to write on a retired wikipedian talk page. Just wanted to say hello. Akseli9 (talk) 20:11, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hope, pictured --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nathan.

Hello Nathan. It is sad that something drove you away. You are missed. How are things going for you? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:03, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still here. Just as an IP, not editing as much, and not taking part in wiki-drama/politics. Cheers. -2601:281:8100:C820:543B:8288:B7EE:589E (talk) 14:36, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:08, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Lolotte" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Lolotte. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 5#Lolotte until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pichpich (talk) 23:05, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Solemnization

The article Solemnization has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. rsjaffe talk 23:43, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bosnia and Herzegovina rock climbers

A tag has been placed on Category:Bosnia and Herzegovina rock climbers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:22, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Climbing magazines has been nominated for merging

Category:Climbing magazines has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Aszx5000 (talk) 00:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Climbing magazines has been nominated for renaming

Category:Climbing magazines has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Aszx5000 (talk) 15:01, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrew Palmer (climber)

The article Andrew Palmer (climber) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being the 10th person to climb 5.15a in America does not make you a notable climber (i.e. unlike being on this list); his repeat of Jaws II (which is itself, not a notable climb, unlike say Jumbo Love), is at best a case of BLP1E. There is no WP:SIGCOV on Palmer in the climbing media per WP:NCLIMBER, and he gets little coverage outside of passing mentions/namechecks. I removed WP:RS that was from blogs and sponsors. Happy to do this as an WP:AFD but thought I would use PROD first.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Climbing magazines has been nominated for renaming

Category:Climbing magazines has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Aszx5000 (talk) 15:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]