User talk:12.15.146.127

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 12.15.146.127, is registered to AT&T Data Communications Services and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Notre Dame High School (Lawrence, Massachusetts) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Thanks for experimenting with the page Statue of Liberty on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 20:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2009

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Neofolk. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 18:10, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to B'eirth, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 18:13, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You really need to source such additions. Please find reliable sources and cite them when making edits that contain contentious claims such as the ones you've been adding to neofolk articles. Also a reminder that forums and blogs are not reliable sources. - BalthCat (talk) 18:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Death in June, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Quaeler (talk) 18:34, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Cosmic Egg has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Vipin Hari || talk 17:18, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Wolfmother (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 17:18, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Peter Boyle. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. RandomStringOfCharacters (talk) 17:20, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Peter Boyle. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. RandomStringOfCharacters (talk) 17:20, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Peter Boyle. RandomStringOfCharacters (talk) 17:21, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 31 hours from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Menti fisto 17:26, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

If you think you're being funny at the Aerosmith article: you're not. Please stop, or you will be blocked. Again. 94.212.31.237 (talk) 15:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jim_Mullaney article

I just read your modification to the Jim_Mullaney article. Or should I say, your last TWO modifications. Done a whole week apart too! And I have to say.... hilarious! I laughed my ass off. But then this is coming from someone who started reciting the "Oh god, my how big you are...." speech from Monty Python's the meaning of life in high school (at the private semi-religious school Washington College Academy) when he was called on to lead the entire school in a prayer. (They never called on me again after that.) So I'm certainly not going to complain about it to anyone. I just wonder how long it will last. How about something about a pigeon-sacrificing religion forming around his resurrection for a third edit? I triple-dare ya! 174.25.60.34 (talk) 03:31, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Arion Salazar has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. P Carn (talk) 20:24, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Poaching has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:50, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Western Massachusetts appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. - Denimadept (talk) 15:34, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Western Massachusetts. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. - Denimadept (talk) 17:56, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Inflammatory bowel disease with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nasnema Chat 18:04, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Hello, I'm Jeff G.. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 13 (number), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 16:58, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Mika Brzezinski. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — SamX‧☎‧✎‧S 21:59, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Michelin starred restaurants may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| [[Boston]] || [[Blue Dragon (HAHA Margaret!!]] || [[Ming Tsai]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:27, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Dmitry Medvedev, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Widr (talk) 21:33, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Hello, I'm Kharkiv07. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Lewiston, Maine— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kharkiv07 (T) 14:57, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maine. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 15:12, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Maine, you may be blocked from editing. JeremiahY (talk) 15:13, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Auburn, Maine. TerryAlex (talk) 15:16, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Monty ₈₄₅ 18:56, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2016

Hello, I'm Cameron11598. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Hypovitaminosis D— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Cameron11598 ^(Talk) 20:37, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.