User talk:2601:19E:427E:5BB0:8BAB:B116:675B:AB5F

September 2024

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Posts you have made:

“ It seems you can't argue your point so decide to say no based on your opinion? “

“ Do you have a COI on this topic given your apparent denial without justification?”

“Else, you are wrongly discarding several legitimate sources because they are not your preferred ones.”

“I don't see your good faith, sadly.’

“Please stop Wikipedia:Casting aspersions.”

“Much to your disappointment, it would seem - given your staged opinions.”

“Finally, blocking a valid source since it states facts that don't seem to conform to your vision of this article seems like a violation of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. I would like to remind everybody that Wikipedia:Ownership of content applies.”

Please realize none of this is conducive to collaboration, O3000, Ret. (talk) 00:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Wow.

This is seriously wrong. I have asked you @Objective3000 3 times already to please stop editing my comments, posting on my TP, and following me around.

This is just wrong that you keep doing so and on top of it are threatening to block me.

I would ask, yet again, for an uninvolved administrator to look into your comments to my TP and replies to my comments elsewhere, and to asses if what you are doing is correct per WP own rules. This neutral and uninvolved administrator can take a look at my requests for edits and TP comments and assess if I have violated any WP rule to merit you threatening to block me.

I seriously feel you might be trying to bait me into replying to you with anger so you can block me.

In the mean time, I want to ask you for a fourth (4th) time to stop editing my comments, replying to me, and posting on my TP. Please. Enough.

2601:19E:427E:5BB0:8BAB:B116:675B:AB5F (talk) 00:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

For the record, since you seem to be Wikipedia:Casting aspersions by staying to another editor that I "will delete" this post on this TP.

You replied to me previously this:

"See: [2] O3000, Ret. Your other sources all use the Tennessee Star as a source. They are not additional sources."

--this is wrong sinfe many other sources have independently covered this. These sources seem to not be your liking but they are not deprecated not blocked.

You then further replied by stating:

"First, read WP:PA WP:AGF WP:CIV as you have violated them all. Next you can read 3. This is one of several WP:RSN discussions on Tennessee Star and related fake news sites."

--this goes against Wikipedia:Bite and seems like a clear case of Wikipedia:Wikilawyering. I very much disagree with your tone and intent and believe you havent replied to the facts I presented. I thus believe we wont be able to come to a consensus you and I, so I politely asked you to stop replying to me and for an uninvolved editor to chime in.

The above wasn't enough. You further replied, posted on my TP, replied on your own TP, and further posted yet again on my TP while threatening a block.

All of the above fails Wikipedia:Civility and clearly shows you do not assume good faith in me. I believe this might be due to me being an IP, which is perfectly fine for any newcomer and under WP rules.

If you feel I have strictly violated any of WPs rules, please go ahead and block me then. It seems to be the outcome you want. But let it be known that I have not cursed, used pejorative language, pushed non-facts or deprecated sources nor harassed anybody. I asked you four times to please stop contacting me and yet here we are. I apologize for having bothered you even though I have not seen pointed out what specific rule I apparently broke and how/which comment of mine.

Please, let me ask one more time. @Objective3000, please do not contact me further. Please do not edit my comments further. Please do not post on my TP. Please do not post elsewhere about what you think I will do or not with ill intent.

Thank you.

2601:19E:427E:5BB0:8BAB:B116:675B:AB5F (talk) 01:03, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Diffs, please, of where Objective3000 edited your comments? —C.Fred (talk) 01:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

I am not sure what you are asking for. Given I noticed you replied on his TP negatively against me, I dont believe your comment comes in good faith. Since this is not your TP, I would also like to ask you, @C.Fred, to stop commenting on my TP, replying to any comments I make or go through my edits and trying to counter any suggestion of mine.

I am not saying you are doing all of them now but I want to cover my bases and ask you to please stop engaging with me and my TP.

I'd like to remind you of Wikipedia:USERTALKSTOP.

Thank you and have a good day.

2601:19E:427E:5BB0:8BAB:B116:675B:AB5F (talk) 01:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

As you wish. I will make one additional posting, which is the required message after opening the noticeboard report. —C.Fred (talk) 01:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

The following notice is required. Clear on final.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 01:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Go to the revision history of talk pages where your comments were edited. Find the change that edited your comment, and click on its "prev" button. Copy the URL and paste it here. Please note that as a matter of policy, personal attacks are removed to cool down the temperature. Aaron Liu (talk) 02:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

• As a reminder, 2023 Nashville school shooting is covered under the contentious topics procedure. Your misgendering of the shooter in this comment, while not a BLP violation, could easily be interpreted as a lack of neutrality with regard to the topic, if not an indicator that you are not editing in good faith. —C.Fred (talk) 01:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

  I responded and given all of the above, including your threat of banning, it seems you harbor ill will against me and possibly posting in a duo format against me here.

  Please be Wikipedia:Civility.

  2601:19E:427E:5BB0:8BAB:B116:675B:AB5F (talk) 01:57, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Disputes happen daily on Wikipedia. If you want to be an editor for the long-term on Wikipedia, you have to stop treating every editor who has a question about your edits as an adversary. We all get critiqued and you can't stop anyone from looking at your Contributions. All edits are public information. This is a collaborative editing project and that means getting along with those we agree with as well as those with whom we disagree. Don't worry, I won't be back so you don't need to ban me from this User talk page (which actually belongs to anyone using this IP address). Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:09, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

---