User talk:Aaker

Welcome!

WELCOME!! Hello, Aaker! I want to personally welcome you on behalf of the Wikipedia community. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you haven't already, you can put yourself in the new user log and thelist of users so you can be properly introduced to everyone. Don't forget to be bold, and don't be afraid of hungry Wikipedians...there's a rule about not biting newcomers. Some other good links are the tutorial, how to edit a page, or if you're really stuck, see the help pages. Wikipedia is held up by Five Pillars...I recommend reading about them if you haven't already. Finally, it would be really helpful if you would sign your name on talk pages, so people can get back to you quickly. It's easy to do this by clicking the button (next to the one with the "W" crossed out) one from the end on the left. If that's confusing, or if you have any questions, feel free to drop me a ♪ at my talk page (by clicking the plus sign (+) next to the tab at the top that says "edit this page")...and again, welcome!--ViolinGirl^♪ 16:24, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Rwanda (English in Rwanda)

I've responded to your query. Kahuzi 08:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the laugh

And the answer to your question is "no" (grin) Valentinian ^{T / C} 22:28, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Aaker 15:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nordiska språk.PNG

Hej Aaker

Tak for at uploade dette billede til Commons, men siden du inkluderer norsk, svensk, islandsk, færøsk og finlandssvensk, undrer det mig hvorfor du ikke har medregnet dansk til samme kategori. Mvh Valentinian ^{T / C} 14:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Danska ska vara med under samma kategori. Det är också så som jag har skapat bilden. Danska har en något ljusare blå färg än norska och svenska, och det kanske är svårt att se. På min dator/computer är det dock inga problem men det kanske är annorlunda på din. Aaker 21:32, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok men jeg skal næsten knibe øjnene sammen for at kunne se forskellen mellem Danmark og Tyskland. Gider du evt. bruge en anden farve? Valentinian ^{T / C} 21:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tak for at opdatere filen. Den nye version er meget bedre. Mvh. Valentinian ^{T / C} 17:26, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ingen orsak! Aaker 17:28, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Latin Cultures/ France

In your comment with your deletion edit on Latin Cultures you wrote "who has questioned France as country of Latin identity and culture??? how"

In response to your above comment I would draw your attention to the Basques, Bretons, Alsatians, Martiniquans, etc. who are undoubtably French but definitely not Latin. French national identity is explicitally based on an idea of citizenship and shared values, and being Latin or not is irrelevant, thus the comment, "...these countries in Europe will have weak feelings about Latin identity which reflect a feeling of irrelevance of being identified as a Latin country or not."

N-edits 23:41, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The population of South Tyrol is about 500,000, less than 1% of the Italian population, and half of them are of Latin origin anyway, so Italy is not in the slightest comparable to the several major French regions which might not be considered Latin. Incidentally, the others are of Austrian, not German, descent. I will move our discussion to the talk page to be continued there. The article does NOT say the French are not Latin, it says it is debatable. N-edits 13:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Morrocco Spanish speaking

I disagree that Morrocco is Spanish speaking. 20,000 people out a population of about 30 million is not significant. French is much more widely spoken. If you agree please post a comment on Talk: Spanish Language. If people don't correct the bias the people editing the Spanish language page may soon colour in France and claim that it is a Spanish speaking country.

Vegan, pollotarian

Hello, you,

As you might have read: pollotarian. My "vegan" userbox is a kind of "I wish I was" one. I´d love to be vegetarian, but I am pollotarian. To be honest I don´t eat red meat at all, it´s been 4 years now. But I do eat fish almost everyday and chicken. You are right I should not use this UB, but let it be there...I wish I was... :)

What abt ya?

Ludovicapipa ^yes? 14:15, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I like the taste meat to much to become anything but omnivore. I really dislike cruelty to animals though and I think we should treat our friends better. Aaker 14:38, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes

Yes, animals should not be killed to please humans...not at all. Are you boy or girl?

Ludovicapipa ^yes? 21:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it good that the internet allows people to be completely free from gender biases? To answer your your question; I'm a boy. Aaker 22:34, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, absolutely. Why don´t you reply on my discussion page instead of yrs?

Easier for you, not for me. I can´t guess when you reply. :O)

That´s fine. Have a nice day, nice sunday. Here in Brasil it´s very cold (abt 7ºC) grgrgrggr!

Ludovicapipa ^yes? 15:40, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

German/French language maps

Hey, I'm wondering if you could help me out here. Those maps you made showing the % of people who claim to speak French and German are pretty good. I'm interested in the spread of other languages also though and I'm wondering if you could direct me to where you got the data to make them.--Josquius 13:06, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Just to make sure, as I think you made a typo, but you wanted to move List of languages of Italy to Languages of Italy? -- RG ² 10:54, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- RG ² 10:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Swiss and nuclear weapons

Actually, I think they had been accused of trying to develop them in the 50s at least. Still, it's not really like I care, and I'm sure it's covered somewhere else. But you know, maybe my country will eventually invade them anyway :P -Theanphibian ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

French people

Hello Aaker. You have shown interest in the French people article at some point, you are now invited to participate in a vote for the French personalities to be included in the French people infobox. Regards - Wikigi | talk to me | 11:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brussels language rule

The order of the languages follows the implicit Brussels language rule, which is in the process of being made explicit. In a nutshell, the rule exists in order to prevent edit warring and maintain a degree of neutrality. It is also to remind readers that Brussels is bilingual. Please do not change anything else for now. I'll let you know within a few hours where you can participate in the discussion on the rule. See you then! -Oreo Priest 16:02, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As promised, the discussion is here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Belgium#Brussels_naming_conventions. I wrote this last night, but forgot to pres "save" until now. Sorry! -Oreo Priest ^talk 11:41, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: where are some of those numbers from (African French)?

Hi, do you have some better reference for those numbers? There is no way to look at the book or even to know the pages number.
As I said I doubt the numbers for Reunion Island are accurate, (but they could be right). Thanks FFMG (talk) 15:00, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then, if you think they are valid. Thanks FFMG (talk) 15:12, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts on English Language and Languages of the EU

Ive read your sources. Here is my problem with both edits:

1. You deleted a fact, backed up by a source, and deleted it because of a competing claim of yours instead of discussing it or changing the article to present BOTH views.

2. You deleted an UNOFFICIAL language because it is not recognised by anyone, but then, is that not what unofficial is?

I tend to think its better to try to represent VIEWS rathern than just deleting things? Or discuss and find consensus rather than deleting things that you do not like.

Shabidoo 23:55, 24 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shabidoo (talk • contribs)

Keep on dreaming - the use of French is increasing?

Hello Aaker. I reacted to your comment regarding the fact that you were claiming that the use of French was increasing, on the discussion board of the page 'French language', see [on dreaming]. Anyway, what I was saying is that: It is not that I'm questioning what you are saying, but have you got proof that the use of French is increasing? In fact, I have the feeling it is the contrary but it is just a feeling, so I can be wrong. Anyway, if you have any document showing this, please let me know. Monsieur W (talk) 09:19, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for your answer. Howerer, I'm a french speaker - indeed I'm French - and I've travelled a lot in English-speaking Canada, and even if French was better known than in any other English-speaking country, still, I rarely encounter local French speakers and when it was the case, the knowledge of the French was pretty bad - actually I met a French teacher, and I was surprise that his French was pretty crappy for a teacher, so in fact, I'm not surprise of the level of French of the English speaking Canadians. It is a pity for Canada because knowing several languages is a chance, for instance, I wish my German is better.

Regarding the use of French as an official working language in the European Union, French was historically the primarily working language, and kept its status until at least 1995. Now the main working language is English, as you pointed out. The use of French as an official language in NATO is mainly on the paper, everything is made to make English the only working language - I've heard a story about belgian and french generals have to be very discrete when they speak French to each other. Anyway, it is true that France is not doing enough to protect her own language, but this is an other debate. Monsieur W (talk) 10:15, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a look at the blog you gave me and I've some doubts of the objectivity of the author and without thinking about it more, I would think that there may be a 'political ulterior motive' behind it. Anyway, regarding the first article, foreign languages are so badly taught in the US that the fact that French and German are less and less learnt by american students is not very significant. ::: Anyway, thanks again, it was very interesting; I was too pessimistic about the situation of the french abroad, as you said, the situation is more actually complex. Monsieur W (talk) 08:17, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I was wondering what you were doing.

It clearly wasn't vandalism, but it was clearly an error. HalfShadow 22:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

French Map

Hi. I've just checked the map, and it does have a 5-9% interval. However, it doesn't have a ≥5% category, which is where several countries belong according to Languages of the European Union (Hungary, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania etc). Interestingly, Greece seems to have been put in the 10-19% category, which as you rightly pointed out should be 5-9%. I'll take a look at it later today or tomorrow. Also, I'll make another version of the German one (without Switzerland and Bosnia-Herzegovina). This will be uploaded as a separate file since there may be pages that specifically reference it (it isn't relevant on the EU languages page, but it may, for example, be relevant on the German language page). Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.ðɒn/ ^(talk) 13:00, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Swenglish

There is a discussion about the image you have added to Swenglish going on at Talk:Swenglish. I thought you may want to participate. Monty ₈₄₅ 21:06, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. When you recently edited Latvia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roma people (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent addition to the 'Sweden' article

Please read WP:BRD. It is entirely inappropriate to edit-war over substantial additions to an article. Please self-revert your restoration of the material, and discuss on the article talk page, as is expected of contributors. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:44, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Riots vs Ethnic Violence

Can you take a look at this article and say whether it should be renamed? Even though it's a very important subject currently there's little interest in it. Thank you. Nataev (talk) 08:40, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tunisian Arabic

Dear User,

As you are one of the contributors to Tunisian Arabic. You are kindly asked to review the part about Domains of Use and adjust it directly or through comments in the talk page of Tunisian Arabic.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 13:38, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mikael Agricola

added a link pointing to Nyland

Paulus Juusten

added a link pointing to Viborg

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Aaker. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Aaker. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ristiina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swedish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aaker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aaker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

French language map

Hi @Aaker. I'm in general agreement with your geographic distribution of the French Language map. The one critique I have is including French as a second language in Syria. I'm not an expert in this area, but I believe that this is no longer the case. French is definitely a second language in Lebanon, but it is not clear to me from the map whether Lebanon has been included to show this. Thanks.--Mrodowicz (talk) 07:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Finland under Swedish rule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Viborg. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]