User talk:Ablevolunteers

Welcome!

Hello, Ablevolunteers, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! I also recommend you read WP:COI. Danski14 16:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability obvious via Google .. AVIF is important as it is a strictly networking and opportunity-providing organisation, strictly 100% donation. We rely on the internet to operate, make no income, totally voluntary. We would appreciate being allowed an entry to aid our reach. Page was originally deleted over a year& half ago but I was not informed or I would have contested, is there no notification system for wikipedia ? "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article". DEA [1] Photographic notability of volunteers on Flickr [2] One Climate [3] Personal notability as Founder Trustee for transparency [4] LinkedIn profile[5] Main network on FaceBook [6] Ablevolunteers (talk) 20:23, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of AVIF (ABLe Volunteers International Fund)

A tag has been placed on AVIF (ABLe Volunteers International Fund), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RJASE1 ^Talk 23:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm always willing to help new editors, but the notice above is really important – in order for a Wikipedia page to exist, the subject needs to be covered in a reliable source. In other words, it can't just be the organization itself making the case for why it's important. If there's been press coverage and/or interest from outside the group, perhaps there's a case to be made. Otherwise, you might just have to wait for someone else to create the page when such sources are available. Cheers! Scartol • Tok 21:50, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Maasai Children.jpg

The file File:Maasai Children.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]