User talk:Amanda.thng

Welcome[edit]

Hello Amanda.thng and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.

Getting Started First steps • FAQ • Article creation wizard Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting help Community Portal • Help desk • Village Pump Where to ask questions or make comments • Request administrator attention Wikipedia: The Missing Manual Place {{helpme}} on your talk page and a small message explaining the problem The Commmunity Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists		Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Click here to reply to this message.

ukexpat (talk) 18:54, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

		The Original Barnstar
		I was new page patrolling with huggle and I came across the article you were helping to write. It looked like student work, so I was interested. I opened the full article and I was blown away. The article appears to be GA or FA quality work. From the page history you appear to be working in a group. Feel free to share this with them. cheers Guerillero \| My Talk 05:13, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Public Prosecutor v. Taw Cheng Kong[edit]

On 15 November 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Public Prosecutor v. Taw Cheng Kong, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that as of 2009 the High Court of Singapore's judgment in the Taw Cheng Kong case was the only decision where a statutory provision had been struck down as unconstitutional? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Public Prosecutor v. Taw Cheng Kong.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--v/r - T P 01:34, 15 November 2011 (UTC) 08:08, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]