User talk:Amanda Jane Mason

Taking a break while this sock-puppet investigation rolls on. Frakly I don't think I'll be back. Wikipedia is not for me evidently.

Welcome!

Hello, Amanda Jane Mason, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 04:41, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте Mishae и спасибо! (my Russian is absolutely dreadful ... I boast it takes me a fortnight or so to acquire a reading knowledge of a language, but I'be been trying these past five years to do that with Russian and I'm still nowhere) Amanda Jane Mason (talk) 05:00, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Title

Well, i had named the article as "Rape in Egypt", because it's similar to other articles such as "Rape in Pakistan" "Rape in the United States". What you would say. OccultZone (talk) 15:33, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmhh... sorry about that. I should have thought to check other countries. I don't think it matters very much. If there really is some sort of policy it will get picked up. Meanwhile "Rape in Egypt" does redirect to your article.

Good article by the way and well researched at a quick look. It does need copy-editing, but it's been tagged for that and that means it will be offered to new editors and you should find it cleaned up quite soon if you don't have the time to do it yourself.

It's vey likely of course that it will attract attention from that minority who imagine rape is some sort of femininist invention. This will be a nice introduction for you to the less exalted (put it that way) layers of Wikipedia. If it gets too much you can post here asking for "eyes" (but not supporting any paticular poimt of view you might have, please) and I'll look in.

Did you really have to write an article about human-animal marriage! I'm not going to read that :)... well not yet anyway. Amanda Jane Mason (talk) 15:53, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see you were only editing that article. Wikipedia is full of the strangest things. Amanda Jane Mason (talk) 15:57, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, strangest things, i was myself surprised by that article, but i found it empty, so added a lot of info, and thanks! OccultZone (talk) 16:26, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mattisse

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mattisse. Thank you. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 23:03, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded to your enquiry. I'm not very happy about this I have to say. Amanda Jane Mason (talk) 07:29, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Magdalen Reading

I'll address your concerns on that page; we have been able to work together in the past. I wish you'd come directly for once, not hidden behind several layers of bullshit. Its very old, at this stage. Ceoil (talk) 20:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ive seen you pull some low strokes over the years, but the series of edits leading up to the Blake edit are so beyond the pale. We know you try and intimidate. You should be ashamed, whatever justification you can come up with. Your basically a scumbag now in my openion. Ceoil (talk) 22:06, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

CheckUser evidence has determined that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked permanently to prevent abuse.

Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement). -- Ruhrfisch (talk) 11:15, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: If you would like to explain or possibly be unblocked, you will need to email functionaries-enlists.wikimedia.org.