User talk:AndriiDr

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, AndriiDr! Thank you for your contributions. I am Wugapodes and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Wugapodes [t^hɑk] [ˈkan.ˌʧɹɪbz] 04:31, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Changing of "Kiev" to "Kyiv"

Your edits changing "Kiev" to "Kyiv" are not being made with care. You are clearly using a search-and-replace feature which ends up changing things like web site titles and quotations. Please check each edit before saving. ... discospinster _talk 01:47, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. AndriiDr (talk) 01:59, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may find it helpful to use wikEd which highlights references by colour, so you can avoid changing such information. ... discospinster _talk 02:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The point of Discospinster's message was for you to undo your mass edits and undertake them again with greater care. As you have not, I have initiated discussion at the Admin Noticeboard. You may wish to address this matter there. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 05:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jack Sebastian: I answered you here.

I suggest you to stop making these changes before the thread at WP:ANI is closed.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mass changes and bot-like editing

Could you advise where the consensus to change "Kiev" to "Kyiv" en masse was established? Additionally, please stop making these changes until the thread at WP:AN concerning these edits is resolved. If you continue making these changes without demonstrating consensus, you may be blocked from editing the article namespace. –xeno^talk 12:33, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Xeno: Here and here, not massive change, only in modern context. What should I do for this thread to be resolved? --AndriiDr (talk) 03:55, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Xeno:, it bears pointing out that the consensus formed at the first link was very rough (as indicated by the closer), and there is little doubt that it will likely be challenged in the near future; it might even come sooner, due to the apparent nationalist component of Ukrainians pushing for the traditional, Cyrillic spelling of the more common name. The second link appears to point to page move cleanup based on the rough consensus noted in the first link.

For me, the best way for this thread to be resolved is for User:AndriiDr to use whatever bot they utilized to undo their mass edits, and then undertake adding them again in far, far, smaller quantities - so as to create discussion at each change. Uncontested changes will happen, but those changes which are more problematic will be a crucible in which a more durable consensus is built. As I mentioned before, I am *deeply* concerned by the apparent nationalist motivation behind these mass edits; if they are not in fact bot edits (as AndriiDr has argued), then there is a lot of dedication involved in making 0ver three hundred edits to articles over a twelve hour time frame. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 19:06, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

I would like to ask you to please stop the bot-like editing of Wiki-en articles for now, and to take the time to contribute to the discussion at the above discussion at the Administrator's Noticeboard. I am marking the time of this edit, and if the edits do not cease for the time being, I will request that you be blocked indefinitely without delay. I am unsure how edits are conducted in the Ukrainian wiki, but Single Purpose Accounts (SPA) are very frowned upon here.
Please consider this message your only warning. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 17:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Taking note of the last edit appearing on your contributions list since posting my warning, for any attending editors to view: re: Buta Airways. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 17:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The debate is over and we have the consensus. My edits follow the consensus, and your argument “I can't follow the consensus because you imagine that maybe it may be changed in the future” is no reason not to follow it today. Many articles, templates and categories have already been renamed, and their number is increasing every day. I'm sure you need to stop creating technical barriers to prevent me from editing, stop insulting me and others, stop personal attacks and stop spamming my page. --AndriiDr (talk) 01:36, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bot-like editing and inappropriate changes from Kiev to Kyiv

Hi,

I noticed in your recent edits, you have been almost exclusively focused on changing Kiev to Kyiv - sometimes in an inappropriate historical context, eg [1], where in 1975, the correct romanization would have been Kiev, or in [2], where in 1961, the same would have applied, or in [3], where again, the same would have applied. Could you please desist from doing this without carefully checking that the time period is correct? Thank you, BrxBrx(talk)^{(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}})} 02:16, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @BrxBrx:, thanks for your note. I think this is not a historical topics. We can say "was born in Kyiv in 1935" or "the event occurred in 1888 in Kyiv", like here or here. --AndriiDr (talk) 12:51, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anastasia Koval, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ukrainian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Since we are slowly collecting material for a full topic ban from Ukraine for you, to note here that this is not acceptable and goes against consensus of the community which currently uses Odessa. Moreover, conscious replacement of a valid link Odessa Raion with a redlink Odesa Raion is vandalism.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:22, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: Oops, thanks, I'll fix it now. I will be proud if reviewing my edits becomes part of your morning routine. There are a large number of reliable sources that use Odesa in this Ukraine-related context. Maybe we should follow them? --AndriiDr (talk) 07:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not before you get a successful RM at Talk:Odessa.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:02, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Ymblanter (talk) 06:25, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrillic names

Thanks for your support of changing in Cyrillic names. Can you check the names in Kiev Day and Night and convert into Cyrillic script? The article needs this type of correction concerning the name of persons in native Ukrainian language. The Supermind (talk) 07:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Supermind: Sure. Where can I put Cyrillic names in the article? --AndriiDr (talk) 09:47, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I put the names of persons translated into English language. Some are Ukranain customs, like Albina Pererva, but I'm not sure about Alexander Vladimirovich and Alexander Ozolin, whose names should be in Ukrainian custom. I directely copy-paste these English translated names to the article. I mean you might to check out the names accordingly to their naming customs. The Supermind (talk) 10:48, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Supermind: Done. Is this what you asked for? --AndriiDr (talk) 15:12, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Well done The Supermind (talk) 15:30, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Supermind: You're welcome. Kiev Day and Night is not widely used in English-language reliable sources, and according to the Kyiv consensus we should prefer the spelling Kyiv here. I'm going to move the article to Kyiv Day and Night. Do you agree with this? --AndriiDr (talk) 04:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, for most non-Ukrainians foreigners, it should be Kiev and it's the most recognized title for most English speaking foreigners. We have to bring into English title Kiev because of its presence in English Wikipedia. Newsbeezer is the best example of foreign website that is not written in Ukrainian or Russian language and use the title Kiev Day and Night. The Supermind (talk) 06:19, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop changing Uk names

In the Athletics project we only refer to World Athletics to have a quite good transcription of Ukrainian names. Stop changing those names without any sort of discussion. Diakuyu.--Arorae (talk) 15:33, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Arorae. Transcription on this site does not look relevant in this case (link) and looks like an error. Here, this site is used mixed writing (link). Although, the site allows different links (different urls).

For the romanization of Ukrainian we use this standard. Transcriptions on this site look controversial, at least in these cases. --AndriiDr (talk) 05:42, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We only use romanization if there is no common English name, not universally.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:55, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ymblanter, Does this contradict to my words above? --AndriiDr (talk) 07:32, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily, but I just wanted to make it clear that the common English name, if existent, takes precedence.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:57, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IOC or WA have priority on official romanization, because of the COMMON NAME rule. For example, Sergey Bubka is not Serhiy or Serhii Bubka, even if he is an Ukrainian. You cannot change this rule in thousands of sportsmen without any kind of consensus.--Arorae (talk) 08:15, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

and Wikipedia:Romanization of Ukrainian/Ukrainian National transliteration table is not a rule for users. But only an article of WP. you are just making confusion, because naming people relies ONLY on reliable sources, never on WP articles.--Arorae (talk) 08:18, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arorae, Bubka and other Ukrainian athletes who have common English name, with distinguished writing, can be counted on fingers. Unlike them, 99.9% of Ukrainian athletes don't have the common English name. Here is the rule for users, based on a consensus, following which we use this transliteration table. Note that the COMMONNAME rule refers to this consensus.

Self-identification of a person plays a major part. A person considers himself a Ukrainian, and uses this spelling itself according to the international transliteration. Other sources use this spelling. IOC or WA, the authoritative linguistics sources to which you refer to, use both spelling. And the consensus tells us to use it. For example, although this site uses Olga and Moskva, on Wikipedia we use Olha and Moscow, or here. --AndriiDr (talk) 06:29, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit to the page AKM, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 22:12, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Change of references into Ukrainian

I understand your sentiment, but there is not a single English Wikipedia policy whioch makes this edit acceptable, provided it is contested. Would you please stop. Nobody cared about these hromadas, until I started adding them to Wikipedia, and still nobody cares about them, but if you want to help, there are still 14 Oblasts where they have not been added, you may use the pattern I created for example and then add Ukrainian references. But just walking after my edits with the only purpose of replacing Russian references with Ukrainian ones is unacceptable.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:20, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]