User talk:Andy120

This user may have left Wikipedia. Andy120 has not edited Wikipedia since 29 September 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Catholic devotions

Hey Andy120.

I just started the Catholic devotions article. It's not much yet, but it is a start. Thanks for your interest. --Vaquero100 17:19, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question on Titles

Is it possible to edit titles of an article, and if so how is this done? Thanks!

It sure is. You move the article using the "move" button (to the right of the "edit this page" button). Your account must be 4 days old to move pages. If the move is controversial or impossible, visit Wikipedia:Requested moves.--Commander Keane 17:47, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Andy120 17:50, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Andy120, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —♦♦ SʘʘTHING^(Я) 15:14, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Catholicism!

File:Image:Vatican coa2.png

Hello, Andy120, and welcome to Wikiproject Catholicism! Thank you for your generous offer to help contribute. I'm sure your input will be much appreciated. I hope you enjoy contributing here and being a Catholic Project Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to discuss anything on the project talk page, or to leave a message on my own talk page. Please remember to sign all your comments, and be bold with your edits. Again, welcome, and happy editing! —Mi ra 00:10, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Vote!

None of those nominated articles are all that bad. All are very extensive and even relatively well sourced. I think the Collaboration should focus on truly needy articles. --Hyphen5 04:40, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move Roman Catholic Church to Catholic Church

There is a vote at Talk:Roman Catholic Church: A Vote on the Title of this Article on moving Roman Catholic Church to Catholic Church. You are invited to review it. --WikiCats 04:32, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic Collaboration

This is a reminder to go vote for the
Catholic Collaboration Effort.
Support or comment on the current nominations, or nominate an article for collaboration.
Current nominations:

Ariedartin JECJY ^Talk 12:51, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Diocesan Infobox

To the Members of the WikiProject Catholicism

I have proposed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Catholicism an infobox for Catholic Dioceses. I have not gotten any feedback on this proposal, so I’m culling feedback, advice, corrections, etc. for this. If you have the time, would you check out User:SkierRMH/Diocese_Infobox and give me some feedback! Thanks much!!

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Leominster flag.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Leominster flag.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Leominster logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Leominster logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WTF???

I'm not vandalising any thing is so where??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.135.62.1 (talk) 04:16, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So,...

What did i do wrong on Guilsborough school, im not joking about those titles, Our tutors host events in school, you better get your act together,

Cheers,

Chris =] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.189.213 (talk) 20:53, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussing Vandalism by other users to Guilsborough School

Andy120, I noticed you have been reverting vandalism on the afore mentioned page. I'm doing the same, and so is J.delanoy. One of your reverts just got there before mines did. I was just wandering if you were going to report the users or do you want me to do it. Theres a whole list of users to contributed to the vandalism, not just IP address. J.delanoy is currently in a bit of an edit war with an IP address. Theres about 3 registered users vandalising at the moment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Olly150 (talk • contribs) 21:00, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure no problem. they like to keep anti-vandals like us busy :) Olly150 21:05, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your VandalProof Application

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Andy120. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that:

You do not yet have enough edits in the main namespace.

Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. Ale_Jrb ^talk 22:33, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Thanks for the barnstar!
Just so you know, the standard procedure is to leave a barnstar on a user's talk page. Otherwise, I may not have noticed that you had added it to my page. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 22:46, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for the barnstar! That was nice of you! κaτaʟaveno^T_C 01:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

Thanks for the barnstar! And you are welcome. Tiptoety ^talk 03:26, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

btw...

How the heck did you figure out where my real userpage was to put the barnstar on it? I thought I had disguised it pretty well. Can you email me a response so vandals can't see the answer? J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 15:33, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wish I had a Mac Userbox

I'd just like to know if you purposely have your {{User:Andy120/Userboxes/wishihadamac}} userbox floating to the right. Other users might find it hard to actually use it and fit it into their pages in a predictable way if it's not floating to the left like all other userboxes. Please fix this or ask for my help if this was unintended. ~RayLast ^«Talk!» 18:28, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fixed. ~RayLast ^«Talk!» 01:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Wow... thank you for the Barnstar. It is the least I can do to help preserve what you and other great editors are doing! κaτaʟaveno^T_C 03:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity

Hello Andy120!

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Christianity

The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Wikipedia. WP:X as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

You are receiving this invitation because you are a member of one of the related Christianity Projects and I thought that you might be interested in this project also - Tinucherian (talk) 11:54, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback request

Hi Andy, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. Just remember that rollback should only be used to revert obvious vandalism, and that misuse of the tool, either by reverting good-faith edits or revert-warring with rollback, can lead to its removal. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. nancy ^talk 05:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom

Some simple help maybe needed on the new papabili list

If you have the time and the possibility the new List of papabili in the 2013 papal conclave WP article could need some help. You could start by taking a look at the talk page. Thanks Pgarret (talk) 09:10, 5 March 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Feast day listed at Redirects for discussion

I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feast day. You might want to participate in the redirect discussion.

You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Catholicism and/or WikiProject Saints --Jayarathina (talk) 12:15, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leominster flag.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Leominster flag.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:51, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]