User talk:Ashley-kun

Hello there! I just joined Wikipedia. Can anyone help me out?

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! You can find lots of information at the WP:WELCOME page, or you could try the WP:HELP page.

By the way, regarding File:EdwardCullen.jpg, I believe the rationale for using that file is the fair use doctrine in U.S. copyright law, which allows the use of copyrighted material without permission under certain very strictly limited circumstances, for the purposes of scholarship and review. Please see Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information. -- The Anome (talk) 17:33, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barbie

The part about Sugar Daddy Ken was moved to Ken (Barbie) as it had WP:TOPIC issues in Barbie, and was a digression from the subject. Superstar: The Karen Carpenter Story was re-added because it is one of the most famous and controversial Barbie parodies, and led to legal objections from The Carpenters. It is here on Google Video, but is not linked in the article for copyright reasons.

Also, when editing, please could you check spelling etc with the "Show preview" button, as the Revision history of Barbie shows quite a few edits that could have been avoided. Thanks.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 08:48, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Bratz. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Siawase (talk) 14:55, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"You were..." vs "You Were..."

I know and everyone one of her fans know the official title is "You were.../BALLAD". However, all Japanese music articles must follow the Japanese manual of style, as well as the the manual of style for all music releases. So do not move the article again per those guidelines I have linked for you. If you have any question leave a response here and I'll reply back when I see it. MS (Talk|Contributions) 23:54, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barbie: Life in the Dreamhouse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tween (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:37, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Barbie Life in the Dreamhouse title.png

Thanks for uploading File:Barbie Life in the Dreamhouse title.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Barbie Life in the Dreamhouse title sequence.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Barbie Life in the Dreamhouse title sequence.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:09, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barbie: Life in the Dreamhouse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Best friend (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:01, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Hi, everybody gets frustrated with inexperienced users, bad-faith editors, and outright vandals. That doesn't, however, excuse editors from being civil in their warnings. While your recent warning to 24.56.202.32 may have been in response to clear disruption from that IP, cooler heads must prevail. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:25, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ashley-kun. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Midge Hadley

Do you know if any reliable sources support Midge (Barbie) having the surname? Ranze (talk) 20:18, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fashion capital

I found your comments there and I can only back your opinion. I came to the article after looking up the term fashion capital and having other rankings that are backed by high-profile personalities from the industry. Would you support a revamp of the list there? ► robomod 10:39, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Teresa (Barbie) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teresa (Barbie) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teresa (Barbie) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Adam Black ^{t • c} 23:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kelly Roberts

The article Kelly Roberts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources provided (interviews, primary sources) do not establish notability per WP:BASIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]