User talk:Bajirao1007

Warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Maratha Empire. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Shimlaites (talk) 08:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whether you vandalise the map of the Maratha empire by logging in or not, we know it is you. If you do so again I will have you banned from Wikipedia- Dona-Hue (talk) 20:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC) Dona-Hue (talk) 20:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Maratha Empire has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Maratha Empire was changed by Bajirao1007 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.8893 on 2017-03-12T09:39:40+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:39, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 10:38, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Map

The map created by you (File:Maratha 1320.jpeg) is inaccurate, as discussed at Talk:Maratha Empire#Change for Maratha Empire Map. Please do not add it to the article, unless you can present reliable sources to support the boundaries depicted in this map. utcursch | talk 12:11, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, regarding your edit to List of countries by population in 1800: please do not misrepresent the source -- it does not mention the population for the "Maratha Empire". Have a look at WP:NOR. utcursch | talk 12:15, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removing content

Instead of deleting it outright, please add a wp:template {{citation needed}} or {{better source}}. Or better yet, find a better source. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 01:02, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User @Utcursch on the talk page for "List of countries by population in 1800" stated that wikipedias guidelines on no original content don't allow unsupported population figures. There needs to be an exact figure stated in the source otherwise its considered original content. On the basis of that, I should be deleting anything that violates those guidelines. Now I'm confused, as you're saying a totally different thing.Bajirao1007 (talk) 01:14, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please engage utcursch as I am not familiar with this article. There is a source on what you deleted, are you saying that it does not support the figure? If so, please state clearly in the wp:edit summary. As you have not left an ES on List of countries by population in 1800 with your latest deletion, I undid it. Undoing unexplained deletions is considered acceptable. Please wp:ping me here if you wish. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 18:23, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well utcursch stated that there needs to be an EXACT figure on the source supporting the figure given on wikipedia. Otherwise its considered original content. Bajirao1007 (talk) 01:40, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder

Do NOT add false images to Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder as such additions are both vandalism and a gross violation of WP:BLP. Perhaps you would care to explain how you found the recently uploaded image? We can take it to WP:ANI and you can explain there if you dont wish to explain here. ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 14:01, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thats my brother with FSA, and its not vandalism if it represents what the topic is about Bajirao1007 (talk) 15:33, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So, it is you doing all of this, do stop ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 15:38, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported you here ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 16:00, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am the one changing the picture not making other edits. Please do not frame me for something I didn't do. Thank you. Bajirao1007 (talk) 16:24, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You should explain that at ANI and see if they believe you. You arent the only one who changed the image, I find it dubious that others were helping you myself. And if you didnt upload the image yourself how did you know it had been uploaded, and if you did why using 2 different user names? ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 16:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Facial (sex act). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tutelary (talk) 23:20, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making things up, I cited my source and you are blatantly making up lies without properly refuting my addition Bajirao1007 (talk) 23:25, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Facial (sex act), you may be blocked from editing. Tutelary (talk) 00:10, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IT IS NOT VANDALISM. Why can't you actually discuss things? I consider your constant deletions to be vandalism. Heeeeeya hoya she oake ornnrnr rjrnrnn reeeeeeee hinga wing shanga tinga booooooo 😡🤚Bajirao1007 (talk) 00:16, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Facial (sex act)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Facial (sex act). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:55, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Whaling in the United States, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:11, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:India#Edits to history in article lede

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:India#Edits to history in article lede. Abecedare (talk) 22:09, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 11:26, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--regentspark (comment) 21:38, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Maratha Empire, you may be blocked from editing. regentspark (comment) 21:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can't create your own map and publish it on Wikipedia. Please read WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. Best. --regentspark (comment) 21:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hinduism. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Take also note of WP:3RR. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:07, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As expected, Clarke (2011) does not support your edit. Next time you engage in such WP:DISRUPTIVE editing, I'll report you at WP:ANI. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:31, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hinduism

A couple of things you need to note. First, per WP:BRD, if you find that content you're adding is reverted, you need to get consensus on the talk page for that content. Editwarring will get you into trouble. Second, statements such as this one are not a good idea. We don't attach religion to sources but trust that scholarly sources are well researched and peer reviewed regardless of the religion, ethnicity, or national origin of the scholar. You've already been warned of discretionary sanctions in this area and, if you go on like this, you're likely to end up with a topic ban. --regentspark (comment) 21:19, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]