User talk:BalbinoFelipe
Welcome!
[edit]
|
July 2011
[edit]
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Anderson Vital da Silva a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. GiantSnowman 16:50, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Diego Rosa
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Diego Rosa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bluefist talk 22:45, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Júlio César Godinho Catole
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Júlio César Godinho Catole requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bluefist talk 22:47, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Addition of soccer players
[edit]We have a policy here on Wikipedia to only allow notable people and things. We do have an exception for sports players, but they have to be on professional teams, CR Vasco da Gama is not a professional team, so sorry, but please stop making these unless you have verifiable content. Bluefist talk 22:52, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Re:Addition of soccer players
[edit]Club de Regatas Vasco da Gama is a Brazilian professional team.
BalbinoFelipe (talk) 00:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
The article Diogo José Gonçalves da Silva has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —KuyaBriBriTalk 22:53, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
The article Willian Barbio has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —KuyaBriBriTalk 22:53, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
The article Anderson Patrick Aguiar Oliveira has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —KuyaBriBriTalk 22:54, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.
- Anderson Patrick Aguiar Oliveira (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link to Forward
- Willian Barbio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link to Forward
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:29, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Wiliam Barbio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Diego Rosa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi BalbinoFelipe, I noticed that you reverted my copyedit on the Vasco da Gama page. As it stands it is not able to be understood by someone who reads English. I think the translation software has not done an adequate job in this case. Would you not like to see the page readable in English? If you are amenable to this, I am sure we can come to a compromise so all the details are still there for you. Let me know what you think - please. Kind regards, Myrtle. Myrtlegroggins (talk) 11:37, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Ok. I'm a Portuguese speaker, any help is welcome.
BalbinoFelipe (talk) 00:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pipico, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Forward and Copa Rio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luan Garcia Teixeira, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Defender and Vitória (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maicon Assis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bento Gonçalves (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
The article Jonathan Marlone has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 23:51, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
The article Maicon Assis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:19, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
The article Diogo José Gonçalves da Silva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:23, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
The article Abuda (footballer born 1989) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:25, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 25
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maicon Assis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit] Thanks for contributing the new article Jonathan Marlone. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources. Please help by adding more sources to the article you created, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see here for how to do inline referencing). Many thanks! PS If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. GiantSnowman 15:06, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Re:Your recent edits
[edit]Ok. This page now has sources since was edited by other users.
BalbinoFelipe (talk) 00:30, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Re (2013 CR Vasco da Gama season)
[edit]Thanks for letting me know. Happy editing. Widr (talk) 22:22, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Re:Re (2013 CR Vasco da Gama season)
[edit]You're welcome.
BalbinoFelipe (talk) 00:33, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elsinho, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
The article Abuda (footballer born 1989) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:06, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
The article Elsinho has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:06, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
The article Thiago Henrique Silva Maia has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:07, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
The article Guilherme Costa has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:07, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thiago Henrique Silva Maia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
February 2013
[edit]
Do not create, add, or restore hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did with the article Juan Emanuel Uriaz. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Camw (talk) 05:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Re:February 2013
[edit]Ok.
BalbinoFelipe (talk) 00:38, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 31
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rafael Vaz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, BalbinoFelipe. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Willen (footballer), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Willen (footballer) to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.
If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.
Thanks, Tco03displays (talk) 13:51, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
December 2013
[edit] Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2011 CR Vasco da Gama season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- |{{flagicon|BRA}} [[Clube Atlético Paranaense|Atlético Paranaense]] (on loan from [[CR Vasco da Gama|Vasco da Gama]]
- |}
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:09, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2000 CR Vasco da Gama season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 16
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marlon Farias Castelo Branco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:00, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 21
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daniel Chávez Betancourt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Daniel Chávez Betancourt. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Ok. This page now has sources since was edited by other users.
BalbinoFelipe (talk) 00:40, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Jefferson Lopes Faustino. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Ok. This page now has sources since was edited by other users.
BalbinoFelipe (talk) 00:42, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
The article Jefferson Lopes Faustino has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. j⚛e deckertalk 00:27, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
The article Daniel Chávez Betancourt has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. j⚛e deckertalk 00:27, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Rafael Silva dos Santos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Forward
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Template:Club de Regatas Vasco da Gama squad
[edit]You should have requested a page move. DO NOT blank the template. SLBedit (talk) 20:18, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Re:Template:Club de Regatas Vasco da Gama squad
[edit]Ok. This template has already moved and deleted.
BalbinoFelipe (talk) 00:44, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:CR Vasco da Gama squad
[edit]A tag has been placed on Template:CR Vasco da Gama squad, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SLBedit (talk) 21:56, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
A page you started (2015 CR Vasco da Gama season) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating 2015 CR Vasco da Gama season, BalbinoFelipe!
Wikipedia editor Ironholds just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Please add citations to articles you create.
To reply, leave a comment on Ironholds's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Renato Kayser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paraná. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, BalbinoFelipe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Please, when there's no fixed numbers for a squad, divide the players by proper positions, like I did there. Ordering initially by positions (GK, CB, FB, MF and FW), then by names. Thank you, MYS77 ✉ 01:10, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Ok. Now the squad has fixed numbers.
BalbinoFelipe (talk) 00:46, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, BalbinoFelipe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Sources
[edit]Hello, can you please add clear sources to 2018 CR Vasco da Gama season? There appear to be none. There is an 'external link' but that means 'suggestions for further reading' and it looks like you tried to add a reference and something went wrong. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 13:22, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- Can you please respond? Boleyn (talk) 08:10, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Re:Sources
[edit]Ok. Thanks. I'll add the sources as soon I'll be unblocked.
BalbinoFelipe (talk) 00:49, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (2018 CR Vasco da Gama season) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating 2018 CR Vasco da Gama season, BalbinoFelipe!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This has been tagged for referencing issues.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn (talk) 17:47, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Re:A page you started (2018 CR Vasco da Gama season) has been reviewed!
[edit]Ok. Thanks. I'll add the references as soon I'll be unblocked.
BalbinoFelipe (talk) 00:51, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Alan (footballer, born 1998)) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Alan (footballer, born 1998), BalbinoFelipe!
Wikipedia editor Anbans 585 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Add some more citations to the page, if possible
To reply, leave a comment on Anbans 585's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Anbans 585 (talk) 06:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Re:A page you started (Alan (footballer, born 1998)) has been reviewed!
[edit]Ok. Thanks. I'll add the citations as soon I'll be unblocked.
BalbinoFelipe (talk) 00:51, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve 1998 CR Vasco da Gama season
[edit]Hi, I'm Boleyn. BalbinoFelipe, thanks for creating 1998 CR Vasco da Gama season!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 08:09, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Re:Ways to improve 1998 CR Vasco da Gama season
[edit]Ok. Thanks. I'll add sources as soon I'll be unblocked.
BalbinoFelipe (talk) 02:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Sources and communication
[edit]I have contacted you several times about creating unreferenced articles. You have not responded, and have created more unref articles, like 2010 CR Vasco da Gama season. Please see WP:V, WP:Communication is required and WP:BURDEN. If you continue to ignore messages raising concerns, you risk being blocked. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:36, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Re:Sources and communication
[edit]Ok. I saw it since I was blocked.
BalbinoFelipe (talk) 02:23, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve 1997 CR Vasco da Gama season
[edit]Hi, I'm Meatsgains. BalbinoFelipe, thanks for creating 1997 CR Vasco da Gama season!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Meatsgains(talk) 01:46, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Re:Ways to improve 1997 CR Vasco da Gama season
[edit]Ok. Thanks. I'll add sources as soon I'll be unblocked.
BalbinoFelipe (talk) 02:24, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Boleyn (talk) 17:15, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
- I have blocked your account for long-term refusal to communicate. If you would like to continue editing here, please show us you're willing and able to communicate by addressing the messages above. Swarm ♠ 22:17, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- You had plenty of opportunities to communicate before the block. Please respond to the previously raised concerns and address them, then we can consider unblocking. You can communicate here on your talk page till you are unblocked.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:57, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- You can begin by reading the following sentence and telling us what it means and how it relates to your block.
All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:01, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
[Permalink to ANI-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:10, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Appealing the block
[edit]
BalbinoFelipe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Appealing this block because, first of all, I want to continue to editing, and, I was blocked due to lack of communicate, but how can I will be able to learn and amend my problems of communicate since I was blocked?
Decline reason:
this account has been active for nine years, which is long enough to learn how things work here. And you can edit your talk page while blocked. You could start by answering the questions above on this page.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:19, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Appealing the block (2)
[edit]BalbinoFelipe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I already answered all the questions above, as recommended. I don't know more to do to be unblocked, because doing more than that (adding sources on articles, for example), only if I will be unblocked
Decline reason:
I am declining this request. You acknowledged the questions above, but you don't really answer them. You will need to clearly explain that you understand what you are being told, by telling us in your own words what you have been told, and tell us what types of edits you want to make if you are unblocked. 331dot (talk) 08:43, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Appealing the block (3)
[edit]BalbinoFelipe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I said on the aswers that, as soon as possible, the citations, references and sources will be posted, and this was also the reason given to justify my blocking. I have tried to answer the questions asked in the clearest way possible, even the issues outdated, and even not being able to respond directly by being blocked, not even going to user talk pages (less mine). I really don't know what else to do to get unblocked. And my only method of communication is to open block appeals, which annoys all, especially me.
Decline reason:
No. References, sources, etc. must be included in the article at the time it is first created. Why did you not do this, is spite of multiple requests on this page to do so? And why did you repeatedly decline to answer perfectly reasonable questions, also on this page? ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:18, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Re:Appealing the block (3)
[edit]BalbinoFelipe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Well, I understand the reason for the block already. That appeared this in my first attempt to edit after the block, and after was better explained. And I have no problem to admit that I messed up and made a mistake about it, and that was something that I admitted already. Since then, I have followed the guidelines left here, and with this even amending and correcting my lack of knowledge about communication that I talk about above. This is my first block. I don't think that it is fair that my first block is treated with so inflexibly. If at least my case is about vandalism or bad faith... But... Well, I was blocked 1 month ago. I would like then to know when I will be blocked.
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 12:09, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Appealing the block (4)
[edit]BalbinoFelipe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Updating and reposting about my block. Well, I understand the reason for the block already. That appeared this in my first attempt to edit after the block, and after was better explained. And I have no problem to admit that I messed up and made a mistake about it, and that was something that I admitted already. Since then, I have followed the guidelines left here, and with this even amending and correcting my lack of knowledge about communication that I talk about above. This is my first block. I don't think that it is fair that my first block is treated with so inflexibly. If at least my case is about vandalism or bad faith... But is not the case. Well... I was blocked more than 2 months ago. I really would like then to know how much longer I will be blocked.
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only, no response to queries below. 331dot (talk) 15:14, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Can you tell us:
- (a) how (exactly) do you plan to change your behavior if unblocked?
- (b) what is your understanding of wp:verifiability, WP:sources and WP:notability? Please, give detailed answer so that we can be convinced that you understand those issues.
Take as much time as you need. Remember, it is essential for you to convince us the you now understand the rules and that you will change behavior. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:49, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Re:Appealing the block (4)
[edit]BalbinoFelipe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Answering the questions of Vanjagenije (talk) (See also) : (a) how (exactly) do you plan to change your behavior if unblocked? : – According to the informations, I'm blocked because of the communication difficulties and the absence of posting the sources in the editions. So, most of all, I'll be more accessible to communications (what I show on last months, with the blocking case) and sources posts. : (b) what is your understanding of wp:verifiability, WP:sources and WP:notability? Please, give detailed answer so that we can be convinced that you understand those issues. : – About these matters, the analysis of sources is fundamental to the credibility not only of Wikipedia, but also of any work that involves information. From this enters the commitment reported on the previous answer. I'm waiting answers soon.
Decline reason:
This is in no way convincing. Your answer to the first question gives no details of how you intend to be "more accessible to communications", and I can't even parse your answer to the second question, which doesn't appear to touch on the key policies of verifiability, sourcing and notability at all. Yunshui 雲水 09:08, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Re:Re:Appealing the block (4)
[edit]BalbinoFelipe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Answering Yunshui 雲水 (See also)
(a) "Your answer to the first question gives no details of how you intend to be 'more accessible to communications'"
– Well, at the previous answer I gave as an example these communications about the block that I'm having with different users. This, consequently, would apply in other contexts, such as edits. Moreover, this block should be about 7, 8 months, and yet, of course within my availability, I'm at hand of conversation, not because it would be convenient to me, but because of my propensity to dialogue.
(b) "I can't even parse your answer to the second question, which doesn't appear to touch on the key policies of verifiability, sourcing and notability at all."
– About the second question, I could do an article about it, but I'll summarize it to not be long: above what is on these pages cited there, Wikipedia, as encyclopedia that is, is a page for gathering information already investigated and storing it, but it's not a page for exploring and research, so Wikipedia itself is not a source, due its encyclopedic characteristics and also because it's a open broad site. So, it's fundamental the post of sources of the topics for Wikipedia's reliability as a collection.
I'm waiting answers soon.
Decline reason:
This is your 7th block appeal, it's been open for over 2 weeks with no administrator willing to unblock you, and you still don't seem to have a grasp of Wikipedia's policies, much less being able to communicate it in something we can understand. For this reason, I am pulling your talkpage access as the number of appeals is excessive without getting the point. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:45, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.