User talk:Beata Steinberg
Welcome
[edit]Hello, Beata Steinberg and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students. Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, if your class doesn't already have one.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Helpme}} before the question.
Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.
It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and should be treated accordingly.
We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:19, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- Let me know if you need any help. I also am interested in the quality of the SNOMED CT article. Also, this may be beyond your interests, but some of us are involved in making recommendations to the WHO about the licensing for the ICD-11. Here is more information on that. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:29, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
May 2013
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to SNOMED CT may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
|
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:20, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Article Review
[edit]Hi Beata,
I reviewed your project on SNOMED CT, it adds a nice clarity to the overall article, I especially like the chart that you created comparing and contrasting it with ICD. It seems to tie in nicely with the rest of the piece. The revised section gives a clearer view and is easier to comprehend.
Great work. Mark Anthony Molloy (talk) 12:07, 19 May 2013 (UTC)