User talk:BlimpStevenson
August 2021[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to BYU TV have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: BYU TV was changed by BlimpStevenson (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857568 on 2021-08-28T16:10:12+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
August 2021[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was changed by BlimpStevenson (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955748 on 2021-08-31T01:35:50+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:35, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Stop vandalizing Wikipedia[edit]
Please stop vandalizing Wikipedia by adding rubbish content. The legitimate sources you cite with these changes do not verify the content you are attempting to add. Given your history of making so many disruptive edits to so many pages about the LDS Church in such a short period of time, your account may be suspected of and proven to be a sockpuppet, and if your disruptive edits continue, your actions may be referred to Wikipedia administrators for likely disciplinary measures, including, if deemed appropriate, a permanent editing block. Do yourself and Wikipeddia a favor, and stop your disruptive editing before it comes to that, please. If you intend to add legitimate contributions to Wikipedia, please start doing so. If you're just here to be disruptive and sabotage pages, please take that attidue someplace else where it might actually be considered acceptable, because Wikipedia is not the place for it. Final warning. --Jgstokes (talk) 01:54, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Where might disrupting and sabatoging pages be acceptable? I don't think there is such a place. Also, you accused me of making disruptive edits on LDS Church pages. Did you not see my edits on the Karate Kid pages? I happen to be an expert on two subjects: Mormonism, and the Karate Kid movies. BlimpStevenson (talk) 01:58, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
- That's the point. It's not acceptable anywhere, so if you want to continue editing here, stop vandalizing Wikipedia. I don't follow the pages about the Karate Kid movies, so if you've made helpful edits to those articles, that has no relevancy or bearing on my warning about your conduct on articles about the LDS Church. And in any case, the vandalism you continue to commit on articles about the Church would warrant a full block of all edits, even helpful ones you assume you have made. And if you are, as you say, an "expert" on Mormonism, why does your vandalism on pages covering that topic falsely cite legitimate sources that do not support that content? In either case, this is your fourth warning about your conduct, and there will not be another. Any future edits in which you falsely cite legitimate sources will lead to you automatically having your sockpuppet account permanently bloacked fro, further contributions. If you don't want that outcome, stop your illegitimate contributions. Simple as that. --Jgstokes (talk) 02:07, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Have you been drinking? Your reply contained many gross spelling errors. I am concerned about your mental state.BlimpStevenson (talk) 02:10, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Blocked[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:11, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Why? BlimpStevenson (talk) 21:56, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
BlimpStevenson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My cousin, Joe Walz, hacked into my computer and vandalized under my username. When I get my hands on that bastard, I'm going to punch him, then kick him, then punch him again.BlimpStevenson (talk) 22:01, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Since you say someone else operated your account, it is now compromised and no longer eligible for unblocking. 331dot (talk) 22:42, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I might also suggest that you not post threats of physical harm to someone in this public forum. 331dot (talk) 22:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
BlimpStevenson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I can change the password so that it's no longer compromised. As for my cousin, let's just say it will be hard for him to hack into my account with two broken thumbs. Problem solved.BlimpStevenson (talk) 00:33, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Sorry, compromised accounts may not be unblocked. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 04:36, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
BlimpStevenson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The account wasn't compromised. My cousin Joe Walz held a gun to my head and forced me to edit Wikipedia. I was afraid for my life. But now, Joe Walz is no longer a threat as he took his own life yesterday. Please allow me to continue editing in a constructive manner.BlimpStevenson (talk) 03:17, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Enough of this now. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 03:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
September 2021[edit]
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 03:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)