User talk:Boo the puppy

November 2010

11.03.2010 I am reverting or undoing the contribution by "Boo the puppy" from the Arthur Alan Wolk article because it has violated several Wikipedia policies about living persons: poorly sourced – self published sources (references from blogs), misuse of primary sources and disparaging (biased) content. The content is contentious and reports a conflict Wolk is having with bloggers. Not appropriate for information about living persons. LEW (talk) 10:24, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Let's ask a third party. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boo the puppy (talk • contribs) 16:24, 3 November 2010

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Arthur Alan Wolk v. Walter Olson has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://dockets.justia.com/docket/pennsylvania/paedce/2:2009cv04001/321303/.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:50, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello Boo, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Looking at your amusing user page, you might like to read Wikipedia:How to not get outed on Wikipedia. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:24, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have made several edits to articles about Arthur Alan Wolk. Concurring with WhatamIdoing, you should be aware of this recent lawsuit, where Wolk has requested IP addresses. As a defendant in the case you are writing about, and as a defendant in another case where Arthur Wolk has accused me of "inciting" people to write about the case, I request that you please do not write about this case without Arthur Wolk's permission. I make this request so that Arthur Wolk knows that if you write about this case, you do so against my wishes, and that I cannot be held legally responsible for anything you write. My apologies for this message. THF (talk) 15:08, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Take it to Sarah Palin. Screw you and all the other lawyer bullies. I don't let Arthur Wolk intimidate me from editing Wikipedia, and I don't let "THF" intimidate me. Everyone knows who you are. Boo the puppy (talk) 12:05, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removing templates

Please do not continue to remove templates added by other users until discussion or consensus has been reached that they no longer benefit the article. Off2riorob (talk) 13:11, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How are we supposed to reach consensus when you refuse to discuss them? I have explained why they're inappropriate. The article isn't going to get any more notable: if you think it's not notable, nominate for deletion and let the community decide. Boo the puppy (talk) 13:16, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

revert 3rr

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Arthur Alan Wolk v. Walter Olson. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Off2riorob (talk) 13:32, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arthur Alan Wolk v. Walter Olson for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Arthur Alan Wolk v. Walter Olson, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Alan Wolk v. Walter Olson until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. THF (talk) 14:57, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose deletion. Boo the puppy (talk) 12:05, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Username

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Boo the puppy, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 16:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You know why this username is unacceptable. Please pick one that's more acceptable. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 16:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Boo the puppy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

NaBoo the Poppy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Decline reason:

I do not typically do this much research into contributions for a name change - but I am not at all convinced that your goal is to be a positive contributor on an encyclopedia. Your entire "career" has been one of WP:BATTLE, WP:POINT and massive violations of everything Wikipedia is about (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:25, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[1]. Wrong answer. This conflict is beginning to bore people, and pursuit of it will get you precisely nowhere fast. What do you plan on doing if you're unblocked? -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 12:19, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]