User talk:Cilstr
{{welcome}} ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 18:12, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Welcome deleted by request. (See original text of welcome message) —Pengo talk · contribs 01:56, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Steve Irwin
[edit]Your edit is not only uncited but its POV. Countering a quote with a cited rebuttal from a person who can make such assertions would be more appropriate. However, an editor has already cited source to discredit the statement so the addition would be redundant.--I already forgot 05:06, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Cilstr (talk) im happy to see pretty much all of my edits of that time have been restored by others, and your sock puppet account closed. Im not even sure which of my three tiny edits you thought was POV... If you're talking about the cows, a reference pointing to a tabloid magazine is *hardly* a reference that discredits the *science* but certainly points out why he made the wack statement
Welcome
[edit]G'day Cilstr :) —Pengo talk · contribs 01:56, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- You can count your contribs one at a time after clicking on "my contributions" or see WP:COUNT for how to use the edit counters which are generally kinda odd and need too much setting up the first time. Feast is good. :) I am want feast, yes. We are become feast. —Pengo 13:05, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Generations reformatting
[edit]I posted to the Wikipedia:Templates for Deletion#Template:Generations a suggestion to reformat this awful table into a useful navigation box. I'd be interested in your thoughts at the tfd. ∴ Therefore talk 12:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
[edit]im hungry Cilstr (talk) 12:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC) |
A kitten for you!
[edit]cats are people too
Cilstr (talk) 12:36, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Cilstr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Cilstr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Proposed deletion of File:Restaurant view of Lentil as Anything Abbotsford Convent site , in action.JPG
[edit]The file File:Restaurant view of Lentil as Anything Abbotsford Convent site , in action.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 4 April 2020 (UTC)