User talk:CoffeeKing

Welcome!

Hello, CoffeeKing, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Alos welcome to wikiproject christianity! If you ever need help feel free to ask me or others. Merry christmas and a happy new year.--§Sir James Paul<<--wikiholic§ 11:23, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About Indian Coal Allocation Scam

Hi,
You've been doing great work on the article. However, the section headings Who can apply for coal allocation?, Who decides who receives a coal allocation?, What criteria are used in making the decision?, How well has the allocation process worked?, Did the Government have the authority to auction the coal?, How big were the "windfall gains" accruing to the allocatees? are perhaps inappropriate for an encyclopedic article. Also, there is some essay/news like tone. I suggest putting these sections under one main section of CAG Report. If you can, I need you to work on it. Harsh (talk) 11:17, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Harsh. I think you're right. I thought I would write just a quick note and it soon got a bit more complex. I'm working on the articulation and hopefully will have something a little more shipshape over the next few days.

Great going. Your work on the article is definite and appreciable.

Harsh (talk) 15:10, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re

As I said earlier, you are doing great work on the article. However, you need to be a little cautious regarding the templates you put in the article. As in here, here, here. Also before saving the changes see the preview or use your sandbox. You don't provide edit summaries too often. The only ones I see are the default ones. Edit summaries are very important. It is always better to compile all the information you want to add first (in your sandbox or somewhere else) and then make one single edit, rather than making 10 or 20 small edits. Harsh (talk) 12:29, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Harsh. Good thoughts. Thanks for the guidance. I'll get to work in the sandbox now!

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your work on Indian Coal Allocation Scam Harsh (talk) 13:29, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Harsh, that is very kind of you. Thank you. CoffeeKing (talk) 22:58, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting Guidance

Hello. I'm new to the wiki community and would like to start working on editing the property insurance page with the help and collaboration of more experienced contributors. Do you think you can help me?Lgkkitkat (talk) 17:37, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting Specific Guidance

Perhaps my initial request was too vague. There is a recomendation that the Chartis article be merged with AIG's page. I think the Property Insurance page could be strengthened with parts of AIG's page since it shows how current events and emerging trends effect it's regulation by the government. Hurricane Sandy and updated payouts of the WTC are not on the Property Insurance page either - which to me seem to be relevant. Do you think adding more information would be beneficial to the Property Insurance page? If so would you be interested in collaborating what facts should be included? Any response would be kindly appreciated. Thank you.Lgkkitkat (talk) 17:51, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Investment

Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.

The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.

Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.

I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject. There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!

Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 19:10, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]