User talk:CptViraj/Archives/2020/September
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:CptViraj. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your note regarding Draft:Vijey Kumar Ghai
Hello, this is regarding your note on my talk page re: my draft article above that was being reviewed by User Dial911, but they were unable to complete review; and suggested I submit article to Peer Review under WikiProject India, however that page appears to be inactive. Although I have attempted to put up the article there I am not sure if that Peer review is working. Would appreciate any pointers regarding a review? I have made several edits since then to trim the article and created additional links to the sources that Dial911 was unable to access for some reason. Thx. WikiCpa (talk) 21:13, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Wikicpa
- @WikiCpa: If you think you've made the required improvements mentioned in the decline note, then resubmit the article for AfC review by clicking that blue Resubmit button on AfC template, after that one AfC reviewer will review the article. I'm currently busy with other tasks, so I'm not available for reviewing. Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 04:15, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks! Will do WikiCpa (talk) 05:37, 1 September 2020 (UTC)WikiCpa
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
- A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors
must
orshould
use the articles for creation process. - A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2020 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
- An open request for comment asks whether active Arbitrators may serve on the Trust and Safety Case Review Committee or Ombudsman commission.
New page reviewer granted
Hi CptViraj. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
- Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
- If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
- Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. TheSandDoctor Talk 07:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- @TheSandDoctor: Thankyou :) -- CptViraj (talk) 08:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- You're welcome!
--TheSandDoctor Talk 20:11, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- You're welcome!
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
GeneralNotability (talk) 21:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- @GeneralNotability: Thankyou :) -- CptViraj (talk) 03:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC)