User talk:DIEGO RICARDO PEREIRA

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Dear DIEGO RICARDO PEREIRA:

Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD!--Asterion^talk 08:40, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image size

Olá Diego, I noticed you've been changing some images in articles to 400px. Personally, I think that's too big, and makes the article looks bad. I'd prefer if they'd just conform to other Wikipedia articles...you see what I'm saying? —Khoi khoi 21:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diego. I'm with Khoi on this: your re-sizing of the map of Troy seems out of keeping with the other illustrations and breaks the formatting on some browsers! Have another look, and see if you think it could be changed back. Regards. --Moonraker88 14:41, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Afterthought: the Phrygia page that you recently edited looks a lot neater, all the thumbs are at the same width (250pixels). --Moonraker88 14:48, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope it's not a problem just to randomly chime in. Unless there is a reason to specify a width, such as forcing an image to be big enough for certain details to show, you should not specify a size for thumbnails. Users can set their preferred thumbnail size in their preferences, and specifying a thumbnail width breaks this functionality. ~MDD 46 96 01:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages

Hi! When moving a page, be sure to check and correct any double redirects that may occur as a result. Paul C 07:06, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries when updating articles. The Mathbot tool shows your usage of edit summaries to be very low:

Edit summary usage for DIEGO RICARDO PEREIRA: 2% for major edits and 100% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 5 minor edits in the article namespace.

Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! --Kralizec! (talk) 12:09, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I second the request for edit summaries. You summarize the reason for page moves, which is good, but not for other edits. It doesn't take long, especially when using abbreviations. TransUtopian 00:49, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Troy

Hi, Diego. I've reverted most of your edits to Troy, because frankly they didn't sound very good to a native speaker of English. (I assume you're not a native speaker?) For example, although some regions (such as "the Caucasus") take the definite article ("the"), in English we never use the definite article with most countries — we'd never say "the Italy", for example. Also, it's not necessary to link common words such as "myth" "clothes" or "port". You may want to check out Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) to get an idea of how much linking is a good idea in an article.

I don't want to discourage you from editing Wikipedia, but you might want to make smaller edits and wait for a native speaker to double-check your edits. Thanks. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 03:16, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand! I insired several new interlinks in the page Troy, and even so I was accused to vandalism! WHY?! DIEGO RICARDO PEREIRA 13:24 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Diego, most of the links you added were to common words like walls or coast. That doesn't add much to the value of an article; we assume that most readers will know what those words mean. It's not necessary to link every word that could be linked — indeed, it's possible to have too many links in an article. That's why I pointed you to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links). I didn't think that what you did was vandalism — I can tell that your intentions are good. Unfortunately, the end result isn't really an improvement to the article. Actually, some of the changes you made may have been improvements, but it's hard to tell when there are so many changes and so many of them are adding links to everyday words, or adding words in places a native speaker of English would never place them.

My advice to you is to keep your edits small — only one or two changes at a time — and then give other editors some time to evaluate whether they're improvements or not. When you make a large number of edits in a short time, and many of them are not improvements, it's easier for other editors to revert the entire edit than to keep only the useful changes. But if you make only a few changes, each one can be evaluated on its own merits.

I hope this answers your question. If you have other concerns, don't hesitate to ask — I'll try to help if I can. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 22:58, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MOS!

Subscrevo todas as recomendações dos outros editores quanto à negligência do WP:MOS. Ainda agora tive de reverter algumas das tuas contribuições por serem manifestamente contra o manual. Por favor, atende às recomendações dos utilizadores da Wikipédia inglesa visto que esta situação é reincidente. Obrigado.--Hús ö nd 05:48, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Não foste acusado de vandalismo, apenas de não respeitar o manual de estilo. As tuas alterações às interlinks são prejudiciais e é apenas isso que queremos alertar. Obrigado.--Hús ö nd 18:17, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FU violation

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Lisa Kudrow, you will be blocked from editing. --Yamla 16:39, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Link on Lucy Lawless

Hi, I'm removing the link you added to the above article per WP:EL - this doesn't seem to be an official site as you said, but some fan-made site. The official site would appear to be lucylawlessfanclub.com. Regards - Videmus Omnia ^Talk 16:12, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Hi, Usually only the first occurrence of a word/name is linked, unless the article is very long. Johnbod 18:32, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sabine, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mlouns (talk) 21:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. Korg 18:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome to wikipedia I hope you enjoy it as much as I do. As I have discovered, there is a lot to learn especially about "style" ... you might like to look at wp:dab and mos:dab for example. Anyway good luck. Abtract (talk) 23:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please do what Abstract says. And again, please use edit summaries. Your edits too often cause disruption that could be easily avoided. Thank you. Hús ö nd 23:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Xena episode list

Hello. I reverted your linking of the episodes' names a second time, with the repeated edit summary "discourage redlinks for articles that likely can't establish notability". If you can establish WP:NOTABILITY of an episode through inclusion of real-world information as outlined in WP:FICT/WP:EPISODE ("sales figures, critical and popular reception, development, cultural impact, and merchandise"), most likely the pilot episode, you should start that one article and see how far you achieve to establish notability. Please don't link the other episode names in the meantime, as they will likely be redirected for lacking notability. – sgeureka ^t•c 22:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

bump* – sgeureka ^t•c 18:53, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Xena. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 19:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Cyrene (Xena). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:11, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Hercules: The Legendary Journeys. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 19:38, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Vesuvius#Origin of the name

Hi, are you sure Alcmene was a queen? The article on her doesn't mention it. Do you have a link to an alternate telling of her myth? Jonathan Cardy (talk) 17:10, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dab pages

Hi, please consider reading MOS:DAB before editing disambiguation pages. +mt 01:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to List of minor characters in Xena: Warrior Princess ‎, you will be blocked from editing. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:08, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Charon's obol

Hello, Diego. I was looking over your recent edits to Charon's obol, and I'm not convinced they were all improvements. I don't like to undo someone's work without a reason and explanation, so please see the relevant talk page for my thinking. Cynwolfe (talk) 18:47, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Template:Italian diaspora. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. cab (talk) 09:52, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Velasca, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stamina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paradise (Lil Suzy)

A tag has been placed on Paradise (Lil Suzy) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, image description page, image talk page, mediawiki page, mediawiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, or user talk page from the article space.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mayast (talk) 09:28, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect page like that is completely unnecessary, as the article Paradise (Lil Suzy album) is named correctly vide MOS:ALBUM#Naming. Please read those rules for naming music-related articles before creating other redirect pages. – Mayast (talk) 09:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to appologise for nominating that page for deletion. Although I don't agree with creating redirects like this, as I find them unnecessary, I asked about it on WT:CSD#Unnecessary redirect pages and I'm going to let it go. As far as Sting goes, I replied on his talk page: Talk:Sting (musician)#Sting's religion — Mayast (talk) 20:02, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Armstrong's religion

Please read our guideline about what we consider WP:Reliable sources. I know, it stinks, but unfortunately Catholic Online is considered WP:BIASED, and apparently they don't consider Free Republic credible (probably for conservative political bias). You could go to WP:Reliable sources noticeboard and specifically ask about the citations, but I wouldn't be hopeful. You would need an unimpeachable journalist or scholar to say Armstrong converted to Catholicism. JustinTime55 (talk) 21:08, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Just for Laughs: Gags, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pierre Girard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of American Catholics. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sundayclose (talk) 20:24, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of American Catholics. Sundayclose (talk) 18:40, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DIEGO RICARDO PEREIRA. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DIEGO RICARDO PEREIRA. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DIEGO RICARDO PEREIRA. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DIEGO RICARDO PEREIRA. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ridley scott listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ridley scott. Since you had some involvement with the Ridley scott redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. PamD 17:52, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 19:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Cats in the history" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Cats in the history and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 29#Cats in the history until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 17:37, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"City of Auckland" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect City of Auckland has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 8 § City of Auckland until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 19:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]