User talk:Dk16

Hi. Please stop enlarging images without discussing. Thank you. --jpgordon ∇∆∇∆ 15:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Dk16, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - Trevor MacInnis (Talk | Contribs) 13:58, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Air Cananda

Hi. I've solved your concern about "too many pictures" in a roundabout way — most of the images are copyright violations and have been removed pending deletion. Just a friendly reminder, it helps to add your signature to talk page comments (using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date). There were three seperate comments on this subject on the Talk:Air Canada page that were not signed. If people want to respond they have to go searching through the history. Best regards Mark83 20:37, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Air_Canada_E190.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Air_Canada_E190.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:46, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your new article Air Canada Cargo

Hi. I'm not sure this justifies its own article independent of the main airline article. In any event, it's likely to get deleted ASAP by some editor unless you can:

establish why a separate article is justify
expand it beyond a sentence
wikify and categorize.

--A. B. 03:38, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Toronto Pearson International Airport stats

Hi there, while current (or more recent) stats are a good idea, you have to reference them. I have not reverted the edit, as I assume you have the reference handy and can add it quickly. Thanks, Flyguy649 15:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to it later, or alternatively you can see what was there in a previous edit, for example under the History tab, compare your edit and the one previous. Also, it is helpful if you could sign your posts. just use four tildes (~~~~). Regards, Flyguy649 19:36, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Air Canada Embraer 190 options

I'm new to Wikipedia and am uncomfortable editing major articles. I think that the fleet table should show options for 60 Embraer 190's. source [1] Air Canada Press Release December 22, 2005. Regards --Rosetown 19:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Air Canada 787 options exercised

Good scoop - I've made some minor changes - also see Air Canada discussion page. Regards--Rosetown 21:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Air Canada

I know Air Canada says so but Air Canada is very very very very very slow with updating their fleet website. 4 years after the 747 was sold to Aerolineas Argentinas they still had the 747 on the active fleet side. The Boeing site is more accurate. Anyways, the total order for the 777 is 8 777-200LR and 8 777-300ER. There is one more coming from ILFC which would be a 777-300ER but that is on hold. They put that single one plane order just to get their feet wet with ILFC. This was before the Pilots union allowed Air Canada to purchase planes from Boeing. A company the size of Air Canada doesn't lease 1 plane. The lease still stands so I will give you that about 17 planes, but it has no date of delivery. Its not determined if Air Canada would take it. Marcus--Bangabalunga 20:56, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AC already took delivery of the leased 77W last week.FlyAirCanada 01:41, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You would be correct. 9 777-300ER and 8 777-200LR. The other thing is I think we should get rid of how Air Canada uses its planes. We cant narrow them down to Pacific or Atlantic and so on. Just last month an A330-300 did the Vancouver to Tokyo route. This route is almost always 767-300ER. Air Canada juggles its planes around depending on capacity or maintance issues. I dont think region usage is needed. Take care, Marcus --Bangabalunga 21:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree... I had another question though: Like the 777 order, can AC switch between 787 models? I read on some websites that AC has ordered a mix of 788s and 789s, but the AC website shows orders for only 788s. So I am guessing that they can switch between the 787 models, too? FlyAirCanada 21:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My read is they can also vary the 787 mix. Obviously Boeing expects AC to decide on the mix by some specific date (unknown). The same sort of conditions apply to the Embraer order, initially, the options were a mix of 175s and 190s and it now appears to be all 190s.

I was the one who changed aircraft deployment from short/medium/long haul to regions. Regardless of which system is used there will be some grey areas. I also indicated in the AC discussion page that editors should feel free to revert. I don't have strong feelings regarding this.

Regards, --Rosetown 21:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My belief is it will be all 787-8. The 787-9 doesn't really fit in with the 777-200LR being there with 270 seats and all. The 787-8 will have around 220 seats and can serve many cities like Winnipeg, Edmonton and Quebec city with international destinations like Tokyo, Shanghai and Paris.--Bangabalunga 22:35, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus's observation may be correct. However, we will not truly know until AC and Boeing ink the mix. The article is about what we know. AC has indicated that is a mix of 8s and 9s. If Boeing indicates otherwise, and I don't know that they have, I would be inclined to place credence in Boeing. Regards, --Rosetown 00:34, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance they will order the 783 to replace the 762 and 763 on some routes? Also, I am pretty sure the order is a mix of 788s and 789s. They need the 789 for some routes FlyAirCanada 00:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The 3s are marketed to high density catchments in close proximity to one another. Not what Canada is all about. AC has not publicly expressed interest in them. Regards, --Rosetown 01:35, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WestJet

Thanks for adding a source to the comment you added in the WestJet Article. :) Greenboxed 02:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AC 777

Actually, Air Canada is also the first to operate the 77L, so the general statement is more applicable. Thanks. -- Phoenix2 ^(holla) 01:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of galleries on Air India

During last week few attempts had been made to remove Gallery of Tata Airlines timetable covers, reason given behind this was galleries are not encyclopedic and Galleries are for wikicommons. They are not encyclopedic.

Notabley there is one more gallery present on the article i.e. Gallery of superseded liveries which was never altered.

If there is any logic and rationale (I couldn't find any in Gallery template page, help page, etc.) behind removal of the said gallery both galleries should be removed. On the contrary featured article like Flag of Belarus, Flag of Canada, Postage stamps of Ireland, etc contain Gallery (which means Galleries are accepted even in Featured Articles not to say about unfeatured ones).

As you have been active on this article you are invited to discuss this issue here on talk page.

--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider Rizvi (talk) 06:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Northern Lights International Airlines Ltd.

The article Northern Lights International Airlines Ltd. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There does not appear to be any evidence that this airline ever got off the ground.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 07:40, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]