User talk:Duckmather

This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

NOTE: I plan to manually archive this talk page every year. To keep things organized, all discussions from the year $2020+n$ should go in Archive n. Also, don't warn me about the blockchain and cryptocurrency general sanctions - I was already notified back in 2021. (This message shouldn't get archived, however.) Duckmather (talk) 23:19, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

G12 decline- that's not how it works

I noticed you recently removed my G12 nomination from the Casa Consistorial de Tarazona article because " the source and the current article are not even in the same language". Please don't do this again. You might also want to read WP:NONENGPLAG before removing G12 tags in future. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 06:42, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rakul Preet Singh

Re this redirect, it's all socks unfortunately. I'm not going to revert you, but I don't think maintaining a poor quality G5 in the history is helpful to readers. Star Mississippi 13:46, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflict?

I presume this restoration of text wasn't intentional and due to an edit conflict?[1] Fram (talk) 17:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Wireless HDMI, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page High-definition.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indian Muslims in the 1857 Rebellion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azam Khan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:46, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Self trout

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

A self-trout for G7-ing redirects that weren't actually requested for deletion by the nominator in Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 5. Duckmather (talk) 20:19, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PR

It's already over than one week. Any further comments in Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Johnson solids/archive1? Dedhert.Jr (talk) 03:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bonus hole

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Bonus hole, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 13:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MicrobiologyMarcus: This was supposed to be a serious draft though. See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 2#Bonus hole, which I closed as no consensus. Duckmather (talk) 13:48, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the case, then using AfC to subvert the no consensus at RfD isn't proper. You should open a discussion on the draft DAB's talk page and notify everyone who participated in the RfD discussion and ask if the proposed DAB is better than the wikt outline currently in the mainspace. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 13:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of LGBTP

A tag has been placed on LGBTP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

LGBT and Pedophilia are totally different.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. X (talk) 08:16, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Draft:Bonus hole, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 17:45, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murat Ertel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anima.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:00, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Advertising

Advertising links and promotional content of Al Hasan Milad page have been removed. Remove the advertising template Entrepreneurbd (talk) 06:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of G5 speedy deletion tag

When you removed the G5 speedy deletion tag with an edit summary indicating "about a real person" were you aware that whether or not they are a real person is not the reason for G5? WP:G5 is for articles created by banned or blocked users, regardless of content. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:47, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bri: I tend to think that articles should belong here on Wikipedia if they are about real people, regardless of whether they were sock-written or not, if someone is willing to salvage the articles anyways (and one admin, Tamzin, has said she roughly agrees with me in this respect). Duckmather (talk) 17:03, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As an administrator, I can confirm that "seems to be about a real person" is not a valid reason to remove a G5 tag. The purpose of G5 is to not encourage banned editors to continue evading their ban if they think their contributions will stick anyway. Especially Slowking4, this is a long-term abuse editor who spams poor-quality articles. Also, merely existing isn't a reason for having a Wikipedia article. If you disagree with the Speedy Deletion process, you should refrain from interacting with them or removing tags to force your own opinions that are against community consensus. Continuing to do so may be considered disruptive. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 22:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have the same question for Muthazhagu (TV series) which is part of a larger sock farm of UPE editors that have been bludgeoning Wikipedia. It is a slap in the face for those of us trying to enjoy our time here and clearing out the work of undisclosed paid editors who don't seem to get the point. The speedy request is for being created by blocked or banned user. Declining so would mean that they are NOT a banned user. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:35, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I realize you are not required to response, but hoping you can shed light on your reasoning for the decline. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:16, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Shuya, Ivanovo Oblast. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:34, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NCIS (season 21)

Hello! Can you close edits for IPs in this article? -- J. Bauer (talk) 20:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC) Or... Can you block this article for IPs? Thanks... -- J. Bauer (talk) 20:39, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@J. Bauer: I'm not a Wikipedia admin; You need to ask at WP:RFPP.

Also, I don't see how the IP edits are particularly disruptive? It's not like typical IP spam (blatant ads or random keysmashes). Duckmather (talk) 20:47, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Thanks. 3 IPs deleted my paragraph about crossover characters...-- J. Bauer (talk) 20:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"China's under martial law" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect China's under martial law has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 22 § China's under martial law until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roberto Lara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colón.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Joever" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Joever has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 10 § Joever until a consensus is reached. Fram (talk) 08:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Hepburn (soldier), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages James Hamilton, Gustav Adolf and King Charles I.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikisource

I'm considering writing a short article for the Signpost about contributing to (English) Wikisource, which I've been doing on and off since this January. Since you're another Wikipedian who recently joined that project, I wondered if you would like to say a few words about your experiences getting started on Wikisource (learning curve, pros, cons, anything really). No worries if you don't want to. Cheers, Cremastra (talk) 14:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cremastra: Sure, why not. Duckmather (talk) 18:26, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can go ahead and reply here, I'll incorporate your comments into the potential article. Thanks, Cremastra (talk) 19:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cremastra: Here are some miscellaneous thoughts, in no particular order (I might stick a shortened version of this on my Wikisource user page later on):

Each wiki is a huge time commitment. When I joined Wikidata last year, I got concerned about whether I could still keep up editing on Wikipedia; but now that I'm active on three wikis (Wikipedia, Wikidata, and Wikisource), my activity here on Wikipedia has dwindled a lot. (In particular, I've been focusing almost exclusively on redirects, dabs, and given name/surname lists, none of which require a lot of brainpower.) In fact, nowadays, my best work here (on articles like Indistinguishability obfuscation and Banking in Bhutan) is way in the past, back when I first joined in 2021.

Wikisource in particular takes lots and lots of time. Even a single page can easily take 15 minutes to even an hour to proofread or validate (depending on how much text there is in it; and at least when I do it the way I usually do, which is retyping out the entire text from scratch and then diffing against either the OCR'd text or the previous version). Short 5-10 page pamphlets can take days or weeks, and entire books are unthinkable. Further, editing Wikisource requires a monomaniacal focus, unrivalled by either Wikipedia or Wikidata (except, perhaps, hardcore sourced content work here, which I admittedly do very rarely).

Wikisource is also (like Wikidata, and the rest of the smaller Wikimedia wikis) hugely under-marketed. The impact of Wikipedia on daily life and pop culture can't be understated; however, the impact of Wikidata and Wikisource, however, is pretty much zero. I've heard of proposals to rename the "Wikimedia Foundation" to the "Wikipedia Foundation", and even though I don't agree with it, I can very much understand why they'd do so.
Thoughts on Wikisource UI/UX (though if you know me, I'm no stranger to complaining about bad UI/UX in general):

Desktop UI/UX is ok. In fact I edit (and read!) almost exclusively on desktop.
The Wikisource mobile UI/UX sucks (on both iPad and iPhone; I don't use Android so I don't know about that). In particular, editing on mobile is close to impossible, with the two-column layout squeezing the wikitext so thin it's virtually unreadable. (I've been thinking about even making a Wikisource app, but firstly I'm not sure that's even worth it, and secondly despite my extensive coding experience I don't know a whit about app development in particular.)
Relatedly, and mysteriously, the Monthly Challenge is completely gone on the mobile version of the Wikisource homepage.
Uploading images is really hard. In fact, I've been even thinking about making an entire gadget just to reduce the process from ~50 clicks down to one (but that would also require me to study JavaScript, which I also sadly do not know). Just to illustrate how painful it is, here's my entire workflow:

Download the PDF source (or if it's DjVu I try to look for a PDF equivalent);
Extract one page using PDFsam and save it as a PDF.
Use pdftoimage.com/pdf-to-png to convert that one-page PDF into a PNG.
Crop the PNG to focus in on the illustration.
Restore the image via onlinepngtools.com or similar.
Upload the image via the Wikisource Image Uploader (which due to my eagerness I have somehow become the ~only user of).
At last, transclude the image into the page.
Also (usually) try to proofread the rest of the page via the retyping thing, just so I can save an edit.

I might continue on with this a few days later. Sorry for being late; I'd been busy with schoolwork and such, and also this took me a lot of time to type out. Also, feel free to ask as many follow up questions as you wish!

Duckmather (talk) 05:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, and thanks a lot! (Oh and by the way— I think the missing-monthly-challenge thing is due to the "enws-hide-on-mobile" class, which is apparently arbitrarily applied to some of the elements on the main page to compress it.) Cremastra (talk) 11:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Can. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Can. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Can. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Gaismagorm (talk) 19:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ahmed Sheikh Nabhany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DAAD.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Massachusetts Executive Office of Veterans' Services logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Massachusetts Executive Office of Veterans' Services logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Kanye East" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Kanye East has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 28 § Kanye East until a consensus is reached. 108.21.221.8 (talk) 01:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"LGBTP" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect LGBTP has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 5 § LGBTP until a consensus is reached. J 947 ‡ ^edits 02:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Duckmather. Thank you for your work on Tennakoon. Another editor, CanonNi, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Consider making the descriptions more detailed per WP:DAB.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CanonNi}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 01:49, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Extraterritoriality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National security law.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bonus hole

Hello, Duckmather. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bonus hole, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Multiplication algorithm, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Modulus and Antiquity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:33, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joever for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joever is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joever until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ArcticSeeress (talk) 15:55, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Poast

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Poast requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poast (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:52, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade: I have declined the CSD because the page I created is literally just a wiktionary redirect. If you still want it to be deleted, bring it to RfD. Duckmather (talk) 17:14, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Surname indexes

As discussed at WT:APO, please do not include "a" or "the" before descriptions of people in set indexes or disambiguation pages as per MOS:DABPEOPLE. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 19:27, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 in poetry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montpeyroux.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Crypto naming controversy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crypto naming controversy, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crypto naming controversy (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Boston's best variety" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Boston's best variety has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 19 § Boston's best variety until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Duckmather. Thank you for your work on 02456. Another editor, I dream of horses, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

That's an interesting concept. Looking up a town by zip code, or something similar. How often does that happen?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|I dream of horses}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 07:08, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cackala

A tag has been placed on Cackala under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 12:52, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prod

Proposed deletion of Pilgrimage centres in Ernakulam district

The article Pilgrimage centres in Ernakulam district has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only 1 item in this list is notable. Unreferenced and unimproved almost 15 years. No decent target for redirection.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 15:52, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Neurospicy" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Neurospicy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 20 § Neurospicy until a consensus is reached. Web-julio (talk) 07:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]