User talk:Empire3131
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:01, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi!!!!!!! Prepster08 (talk) 03:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
AfC
[edit]Hi! Thanks for your help at AfC. Just to say that if you could possibly assess the articles you create it saves time later. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation#Assessment for details. Cheers, Martin 13:36, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- One more thing ... you don't need to remove the ts and a parameters of {{AFC submission}}. Actually leaving the timestamp is better because it sorts the category. Martin 17:34, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
sorry if this is in the wrong place but i think you deleted my page "James Bartlett" and i wandered if you could send it to me at <email removed>
cheers --117Chiefy (talk) 23:37, 18 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117Chiefy (talk • contribs) 23:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- I asked for it's deletion because it was of a non-notable figure. read WP:BIO and maybe WP:AUTO. Empire3131 (talk) 00:28, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 2 | 10 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 19:17, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Think globally, act locally vs Think globally act locally
[edit]The comma prevents proper linking from outside (specifically a blog I'm active in), so I thought it would be simpler to create a redirect. The problem is I don't want to sign in because people at the blog can then figure out my Wikipedia identity. Thanks. 66.57.190.166 (talk) 00:41, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- ah. strange. I'll make it. Empire3131 (talk) 00:44, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Articles for creation
[edit]Hi, do you think this was ready to be created? Please take some time to clean up articles when creating them. Leaving them like this in mainspace just means someone else is going to have to come and tidy up after you or nominate them for deletion. Thanks, Martin 19:54, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- No, It was't, was it. plus the large block print wasn't there. any way to get rid of it (A7?) Empire3131 (talk) 20:01, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Don't think A7 applies to albums. How about we keep the stuff actually related to "Living out of time" and remove the rest of it? If he/she wants articles about the others then they can submit it properly. Martin 21:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sure. Empire3131 (talk) 21:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- It's looking a bit better now I've given it the once over. I don't think I'd create anything without a reliable source in future, even if it's related to something/somebody else who's notable. Anyway keep up the good work, you've got that backlog down a bit! Martin 22:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- That person is causing much greif. Empire3131 (talk) 01:56, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- It's looking a bit better now I've given it the once over. I don't think I'd create anything without a reliable source in future, even if it's related to something/somebody else who's notable. Anyway keep up the good work, you've got that backlog down a bit! Martin 22:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sure. Empire3131 (talk) 21:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Don't think A7 applies to albums. How about we keep the stuff actually related to "Living out of time" and remove the rest of it? If he/she wants articles about the others then they can submit it properly. Martin 21:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Genova & Dimitrov article
[edit]Hello, I really don't understand the Wikipedia world anymore - Graeme wanted from me "profs of notability" for the two artsts, I have put so many press international press releases proving exactly that, I've put the Library of Congress list, where the Artists' recordings were chosen to be included in the woldwide Sound Reference Center, but you decide now that Genova & Dimitrov are not notable enough to be presented with an article at Wikipedia????????? What is going on there? --84.131.101.60 (talk) 12:05, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm going to take another look at this for you. Martin 18:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
I had a look and declined it because it was a copyright violation. So the decision was right, if not the reason ... I am a bit annoyed actually because I spent some time formatting the article before I realised it was just copied. The page log is quite interesting! Martin 22:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- wow. 8 deletions, a ban, and the IP still tries to get it in! Empire3131 (talk) 22:42, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- This is a message both to Martin and to Empire3131 - I was in contact with Graeme when I requested a review adding ONLY FEW simple sentences about these distinguished Artists, because as such there will be ALWAYS somehere in the world some newspaper article or interiew or whatever press release about them and you, Friends, would stamp it as copyright violation. Graeme however declined the request because there was no sufficiant details giving enough information about the "Notabiliy" of the Artists. That's why I created - NOT COPYIED - the text that I put for re-reviewing, following Graeme's advises. Now, you decide just like thisand without to take care of all this, that this is a copy violation. What can one do in order to get a normal text? --84.131.56.81 (talk) 09:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- wow. 8 deletions, a ban, and the IP still tries to get it in! Empire3131 (talk) 22:42, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I've posted the re-done page already on 21 January 2009 but nobody has reviewed it till now. Why?--84.131.70.39 (talk) 13:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Well done
[edit]
|
The Articles for Creation Barnstar | |
| You're amazing. This is for clearing the backlog again. Martin 18:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC) |
Yellow Dog Linux Powerstation article
[edit]After some reviewer put the review on hold citing "non-reliable sources" (I had only posted two sources at that time, and one of them was the company's own website), I put several more sources into it including reputed 3rd party sources like linux.com, lwn, as well as power.org, which is an industry consortium. If even that is *not* a reliable source, I'd like to know what constitutes a reliable source. I'm not taking this personally (as the `article declined' message recommends, and I am not intending this post as a denunciation of any kind, but I must wonder if you have `cleared' out the Afc backlog in such a summary fashion with other articles as well. Anyway, I am posting the article again, and please review the sources carefully (it would help if you actually followed the links) before rejecting it again, as I hope you will do.
Good day.
This was on my user page.
- Thanks for rejecting it again. Could you please explain why?
- PS: Sorry for leaving the request on your user page. I typed it in after seeing a similar request there. 121.241.126.34 (talk) 16:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- PPS: Maybe you could leave some articles for others to review? 121.241.126.34 (talk) 16:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- That's O.K. Someone else didn't find it verifiable and so refused it. I just completed the process. And I don't need to use AfC for article creation because I have an account.Empire3131 (talk) 16:14, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- PPS: Maybe you could leave some articles for others to review? 121.241.126.34 (talk) 16:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for responding. I didn't imply that you leave your articles for review, but that if you were unsure of another article, just leave it as it is, instead of declining it. As you could have seen, that other person put the article on hold, didn't decline it. Placing an article on hold means that that person was not sure of the verifiability of the sources. This could of course mean dubious sources, but could also mean that that reviewer is less familiar with the subject matter. If you found, on the basis of you own abilities, a reason to decline the article, that's fine, but treating an article on hold as an article that must be declined, so as to complete the process, is a mistake. An on hold article can be resolved easily in the other direction (acceptance) by another reviewer, while one that is declined, cannot. So, please, take that into consideration before declining an article.
- Coming to the article itself, the article is, in my opinion, well written, with regards to machinery that is in actual production, as opposed to speculative, and is completely in my own original words, though sourced from others. The sources listed for the article are the company's own website (which may be deemed biased), as well as respected trade news magazines like linux.com and lwn.net, as well as the most reliable, release announcements as well as product pages on power.org, a highly respected industry consortium dedicated to resources about the Power Architecture-based computer technologies. It includes IBM, Motorola/Freescale, as well as companies that incorporate or integrate such technology. You may check the Wikipedia entry for Power.org. If that is not a reliable source, I do not know what is. The computer is notable as it represents the only production workstation class computer available at mass-market prices, and may be considered the successor to the Open Desktop Workstation, though by a different company. It also represents the only major current effort to market the GNU/Linux operating system on non-Intel x86 compatible hardware in a workstation-class machine. This should make it notable enough for an online encyclopedia like Wikipedia. 203.145.134.205 (talk) 19:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Deletion discussions
[edit]Hi, I notice there are a couple of deletion discussions underway for articles you are have !created.
are both up for incineration. And I think I agree with the points raised on those discussions. Don't worry too much about it, but if you're not sure about a submission, just leave it for someone else or perhaps ask one of the regulars to look at it. Cheers, Martin 15:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- By the way, I got the info from this useful page which I have just discovered, just in case you think I'm following you, which I'm not :) Martin 15:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Action Figure Displays
[edit]Please reconsider your deletion of this company/product. I know it to be legit and the company JDP Design is in it's final stages of receiving a registered trademarked and LLC company title. They have sales in the US and international.
72.72.88.234 (talk) 17:59, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 4 | 24 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delivered at 04:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)
Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 6 | 8 February 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 21:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009
[edit]
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 06:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009
[edit]This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
- Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
- An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
- News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
- Wikipedia in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
- Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
- Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009
[edit]This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
- Books extension enabled
- News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
- Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 19:55, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion contested: Rayne Catholic Elementary
[edit]Hello Empire3131, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I contested the speedy deletion of Rayne Catholic Elementary - a page you tagged - because: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. NW (Talk) 22:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, Empire3131! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.
MOTD Needs Your Help!
Delivered By –pjoef (talk • contribs) 17:43, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
I deleted the foam swabs article that you had tagged for speedy deletion. However, the reason you supplied - A7: Doesn't assert importance - was invalid. A7 can only be used for people/bands, companies/organizations, and web content. Anything else (such as products as was the case here) can't be speedy deleted under A7. In this case, G11 - unambiguous advertisement - applied so I deleted it under that clause. However, in general products should either be PRODed or sent to AfD.
If you have any questions, let me know. Thanks, ThaddeusB (talk) 00:26, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello Empire3131, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Xwinwm - a page you tagged - because: A7 cannot be applied to software. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. SoWhy 10:20, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Amusement Park WikiProject
[edit]Hello Empire3131. Recently, the Amusement Parks WikiProject was reformatted and revived. As part of this process other related WikiProjects (such as Disneyland, Herschend Family Entertainment, Universal Parks & Resorts and Walt Disney World) were also revived and have now become part of the Amusement Park WikiProject as task forces. If you would like to remain listed as a member on these WikiProjects please re-add your name to the appropriate lists at the participants page. All names currently on the list have been cleared. If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Thank you for your cooperation, Themeparkgc Talk 08:21, 6 November 2010 (UTC).
Speedy deletion declined: Layon gray
[edit]Hello Empire3131. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Layon gray, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 00:42, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Speedy declined
[edit]Hi Empire3131, I have declined your speedy deletion request for Abraham Myers. There are several sources that cover him (see Google Books), and a county seat was named after him, which is not insignificant, and is a credible claim to notability. Feel free to submit the article to AFD or PROD instead. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 04:20, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- I have also declined your speedy deletion request for Ahlan!, as articles about publications are not eligible for deletion under criterion A7. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:24, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- Can someone explain how publications are not organizations or companies? Empire3131 (talk) 09:17, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- A publication is a magazine, newspaper or similar where information is published. A company is a type of commercial organisation, and an organisation is a collaborative endeavour involving multiple people. So an organisation might be a company and it might also be the publisher of one or more publications, but a publication is not in itself an organisation. ϢereSpielChequers 22:29, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- Can someone explain how publications are not organizations or companies? Empire3131 (talk) 09:17, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
December 2010
[edit]
Hi Empire3131. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I just wanted to inform you that I declined to delete Luciano Moše Prelević, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion because of the following concern: the criterion you used does not cover this kind of page or the reason you specified is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion and especially what is considered non-criteria. In future you should rather tag such pages for proposed deletion or start an appropriate deletion discussion. The man is a rabbi of Jewish community in Zagreb (and as such, one of the most publicly visible members of Jewish clergy in Croatia and possibly other Balkan countries). I think that's a rather strong claim to significance. Peasantwarrior (talk) 12:52, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- One more speedy deletion declined: Jansen's linkage - how can a physical concept fall under A7? I see you've added a number of unnecessary speedy deletion tags in the past couple of hours. Please stop - that too is considered a serious violation of Wikipedia policy. Thanks. Peasantwarrior (talk) 13:01, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Roger Fry (educationalist)
[edit]Hello Empire3131. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Roger Fry (educationalist), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Being a CBE is notable enough for A7, plus founding a notable college. Thank you. GedUK 12:53, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Rohan Murphy
[edit]Hello Empire3131. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Rohan Murphy, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: An article in SI is a pretty clear indication of notability. Take it to AfD if you want, though I don't fancy your chances. Thank you. GedUK 14:00, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- This one looks like it was a mistake more then the others.Empire3131 (talk) 22:38, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Pavao Masic
[edit]Hello Empire3131. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Pavao Masic, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Award winning is notable enough for A7. PROD or take to AfD if required. Thank you. GedUK 14:16, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Sola Trading
[edit]Hello Empire3131. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sola Trading, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to software. Thank you. GedUK 14:21, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello Empire3131. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Narela, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 Doesn't cover locations. Take to AfD if required. Thank you. GedUK 15:38, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- I just wanted to add it seems to me that you tagged a huge number of articles for CSD-A7 which didn't require it. Since you're an experienced editor, I'd be surprised if you've accidentally tagged all these articles. So, I'd suggest you either acquaint yourself with the criteria (although I must say I really don't know how somebody could make mistakes so large) or stop tagging articles incorrectly on purpose (if that is what you're doing). Either way, you know adding inappropriate templates is a violation of Wikipedia's policies - I couldn't find a template warning for this, but that doesn't make what you're doing OK. I see you haven't made any edits for a couple of hours now, but I hope this all was some kind of a mistake :) Peasantwarrior (talk) 16:55, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Silvio Raffo
[edit]Hello Empire3131. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Silvio Raffo, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Winning several competitions is an assertion of importance.... Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 22:19, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
This is why I need to read more carefully
[edit]I'm sorry about all the speedy's from yesterday that were not correct. I haven't been editing for a while, and so some of the critia were less fresh in my head then I thought they were going to be. So yeah, sorry about this. I'll go work on AFC for a while and AFD, and come back to the NPP after a review of the rules. Empire3131 (talk) 22:40, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Tamás Szőnyi
[edit]Hello Empire3131. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Tamás Szőnyi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Full professors get around A7; by quite a ways, actually. Thank you. Courcelles 08:59, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Articles for Creation Appeal
[edit]| Articles for Creation is backlogged and needs YOUR help!
Articles for Creation is desperately in need of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors and administrators alike, to help us clear a record backlog of pending submissions. There is currently a significant backlog of 1403 submissions waiting to be reviewed. These submissions are generally from new editors who have never edited Wikipedia before. A prompt, constructive review of submissions could significantly editor retention. 
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. Click here to review to a random submissionArticle selected by erwin85's random article script on toolserver. We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 1 or 2 reviews, would be extremely beneficial. On behalf of the Articles for Creation project, |
| The WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wikiproject Articles for creation Needs You!
[edit]
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1st, 2013 – March 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 14:06, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject AFC needs your help... again
[edit]WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 1st, 2013 – July 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.
Delivered at 13:12, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC
October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive
[edit]WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1400 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:44, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Empire3131:
WikiProject AFC is holding a two month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from December 1st, 2013 – January 31st, 2014.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1400 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) at 09:23, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on changes to the AfC mailing list
[edit]Hello Empire3131! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
- This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Motto of the Day Help Request April 2014
[edit]Motto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.
Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- This message has been sent by pjoef on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: (page, template, and category).
Notification of a June AfC BackLog Drive
[edit]Hello Empire3131:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1400 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
Disambiguation link notification for March 10
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sister show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Flash (TV series). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Forgot about the whole 1990s/2014 show thing. Fixed it. Thanks. Empire3131 (talk) 21:35, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 25
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Vertigo (DC Comics)
- added links pointing to Tom King, Rob Williams, John Higgins, Ryan Kelly and David Baillie
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
A page you started (Finding Nemo – The Musical) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Finding Nemo – The Musical, Empire3131!
Wikipedia editor Tom29739 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Seems good.
To reply, leave a comment on Tom29739's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Empire3131. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Altered speedy deletion rationale: ACE Money Transfer
[edit]Hello Empire3131. I am just letting you know that I deleted ACE Money Transfer, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. Ale_Jrbtalk 10:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
CSD A3/G7
[edit]As an FYI, CSD G7 is more appropriate if the article creator blanks a page. A3 should only be used if there is no content, and no page in the history to revert to with content. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Empire3131. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Empire3131. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |