User talk:Ezratrumpet

Welcome!

Hello Ezratrumpet, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Alai 06:16, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Just wanted to drop a line quickly to say thanks for monitoring the Heathwood wikipage for vandalism. I'm a graduate, and I put together most of the article (heh... admissions? :-) ), so I'm especially thankful for your continued work. Thanks! Data8504 08:19, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Accreditation, etc

I've looked in (and briefly commented), seems to be a sensible discussion thus far. I'll check by again, but let me know if you have any particular problems. Alai 03:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Question on Concert Bands

'Twasn't I who made that move. I think you're looking for 68.118.100.118 (talk · contribs). Powers ^T 12:16, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peanut Butter Manifesto

Thanks for reviewing my article. I'm uncertain that the article fulfills the a1 requirements for speedy deletion. I'd be grateful for further explanation. Best regards - Ezratrumpet 00:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're writing an article about a memo about Yahoo.com supposedly written in 1972. Is there anything suspicious about that you'd like to revise? Looked like nonsense, considering the date. If there's a legit article in there, then please repost it with the proper info. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 01:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tarheelblue32242 edits

You're probably right to be somewhat cautious about issuing "standard warning templates" where you're the target of an attack or otherwise "involved", but those look like clear-cut vandalism to me, and would certainly warrant it. Indeed, I'd probably block without further ado, but since the account has now been inactive for over a week, that'd look pointless and/or punitive. If you notice a recurrence of similar edits, then by all means ask them to desist (via a bespoke message if that seems more appropriate than an off-the-peg warning tag), and ask me or another admin (via a noticeboard if you need a speedy response) if they don't. Alai 00:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:User:Ezratrumpet

I assert to be the same user as commons:User:Ezratrumpet. Ezratrumpet 23:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wikipedia song

I'm glad you enjoyed it; I had fun writing it. Bucketsofg 02:18, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFA nom

To be honest, I'm not sure what to advise: the nominator seems to be not especially active, so I don't know if they're necessarily 100% up to speed on current admin standards -- whatever those are, anyway. I'd suggest that you accept if you'd be ready to self-nominate, but not otherwise (you can always ask them if they'd be willing to nominate you at a later date). If I were a betting man, I'd guess if you were to be RFA'd at present, you'd at a fair bit of opposition for having significantly less than 1000 edits, which is a fairly common baseline. Hope that helps. And, thank you for the kind words. Alai 03:50, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celine Dion awards and accomplishments

As you've contributed to this discussion, I thought you should know that a number of similar articles have been bundled with the AfD. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 09:48, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Afd Notice - second time around for Unsolved problems in chemistry

Unfortunately this article has again be nominated for deletion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unsolved problems in chemistry. I know you tried to save it the first time around. Could you please help again. --Heliumballoon 17:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Chick-fil-A Bowl FAC

Wanted to let you know that 2006 Chick-fil-A Bowl is a featured article candidate again. You supported the article the last time it came up as a candidate, but unfortunately, not enough other people agreed to support it last time. I'd really appreciate it if you could take a spin by the comments page when you've got the time and leave your support if you think it's still worthy. Thanks! JKBrooks85 23:05, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Savannah River Winds

A tag has been placed on Savannah River Winds requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 22:17, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ezratrumpet. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ref says

"Distributed into breast milk.b h However, use generally is considered compatible with breast-feeding"[1] Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:23, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I get it now. Thanks! Ezratrumpet (talk) 17:32, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ezratrumpet. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ezratrumpet. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinators and help needed

Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.