User talk:Gagliardi89

Welcome!

Hello, Gagliardi89, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mouse Davis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [https://www.facebook.com/TheMouseThatRoarsMovie Mouse Davis}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:56, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from SoCal Coyotes, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal ^talk 18:09, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry as my revert was made with Huggle so I did not see your prior edits to SoCal Coyotes. Looks like you are trying to rearrange some content and are doing so in good faith. You should remember, however, to always provide an edit summary, particularly when you're removing large amounts of source content. Thanks! — MusikAnimal ^talk 18:12, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

The language you are using to write the article SoCal Coyotes is not in a neutral encyclopedic tone (the words "punishing", "dominating", "overwhelming", etc. are subjective and, unless quoted directly from reliable sources, clearly promotional). Please reformat the article to make it fit a neutral encyclopedic tone. If the Coyotes really are notable nationally and internationally, why no coverage from Southern California's major national newspaper (located only 100 miles away), the Los Angeles Times? Koumz (talk) 13:19, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the rules regarding the differences between PROD and AFD. Removing a PROD tag is an acceptable way of contesting it. Removing an AFD tag does not close the related discussion, and is therefore not an acceptable way of disagreeing with arguments for deletion. The AFD tag itself states that removing the tag is not an acceptable way of participating in the discussion. Your removal of the tag repeatedly after it was replaced by AFD-related bots is not an acceptable way of interacting with the AFD process. The tag will be removed when the discussion has closed. Koumz (talk) 13:31, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article SoCal Coyotes has been modified to fit a neutral encyclopedic tone, removing subjective language and material deemed promotional. On the topic of subjective coverage from the Los Angeles Times, this has been addressed on the article talk page. In fairness, if notability were determined only by coverage from a single major-market newspaper within a 100-mile radius, Wikipedia would have to banish most notable minor-league baseball teams, numerous notable minor-league football teams, and even some notable tier-1 Arena teams. Gagliardi89 (talk) 18:26, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to SoCal Coyotes, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. JohnInDC (talk) 11:01, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to June Jones. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Hirolovesswords (talk) 22:17, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]