User talk:Gak Blimby

ATTENTION!
WELCOME TO MY TALK PAGE!
NICE TO SEE YOU!

Image:TV tiny toons logo with buster bunny.jpg

Since the ending credits are not discussed in the article, and the fact there is already an image of the logo of Tiny Toon Adventures, I believe Image:TV tiny toons logo with buster bunny.jpg should be removed from the article Tiny Toon Adventures. – Ilse @ 19:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your concern on a Tiny Toons image, and I'll be happy to discuss it with you further on the Tiny Toons Talk page at your earliest convienience. Thanks again, Gak Blimby 21:40, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is not unconvenient now. – Ilse @ 21:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Gak Blimby 21:56, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Animaniacs

Congrats on your "pet article" man. Amp 19:39, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Simpsons Realities

Please read the talk page, I explained my reasons there. Dagdamor 17:45, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Animaniacs DVD Volume 1.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Animaniacs DVD Volume 1.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Animaniacs Title Sequence

Animaniacs Title Sequence, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Animaniacs Title Sequence satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animaniacs Title Sequence and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Animaniacs Title Sequence during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Collectonian 03:39, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article assessment - Tiny Toon Adventures

As requested here I've assessed Tiny Toon Adventures. I've included a summary of my thinking here.--Opark 77 20:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looney Tunes on TV

Recently, there's been a proposal by Agtax to create a new article about the Looney Tunes television broadcast history; research and development are currently underway. Given your great contribs to articles like Tiny Toons and Animaniacs, I have no doubt you would be very helpful in this regard. Any comments? Suggestions? Ideas? You are welcome to post your thoughts here at my discussion forum. Any contribution will be appreciated. Thanks. — Cinemaniac (talk) 03:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:User WikiProject American Animation

A tag has been placed on Template:User WikiProject American Animation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Wakko's America

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Wakko's America. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wakko's America. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Yakko's World

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Yakko's World. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yakko's World. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer rights

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 15:58, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Parodies in Animaniacs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parodies in Animaniacs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parodies in Animaniacs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:35, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didn't get back to you. I haven't been active for some time. I fully support the decision to delete the article. Gak Blimby (talk) 23:58, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gak Blimby. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gak Blimby. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]