User talk:Gatorgalen

Talk to me, baby!

Mike Bickle Article

I am relatively new to wikipedia. Thus, I may not be the best at procedure or style. I wanted to let you know that I have left made some comments on the article regarding Mike Bickle. Your comments would be appreciated. StopTheSpin 21:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@Gatorgalen: Thanks for keeping an eye on this article.--Bhuck 07:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great Commission Association

Hey dude, if you get a chance, stop by and comment on the discussion going on. Right now there's a decent list of improvements being discussed. If you could respond point-by-point, that'd be best, so we can see immediately what stuff can be done. Thanks a bunch! Nswinton\^talk 20:26, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NLCF

What would you like for me to explain? NLCF existed before the Virginia Tech massacre. It had nothing to do with the massacre. It, like every other organization on campus, helped people after the massacre, but that doesn't mean that it should be a part of the massacre category. Michael Vick donated $10,000 to the victim's fund, but we don't put him in the category. That just isn't how we categorize things. --B 13:30, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what categories are for. Marcus Vick had dinner at McDonald's one night, but we don't put him in Category:McDonald's. Yes, the majority of the article is about the massacre and that's a problem - see WP:NPOV#Undue weight. The article should be about NLCF, not about a single event in school history. The church is inexorably linked to Virginia Tech itself and should be in the Virginia Tech category. It is related to the massacre only inasmuch as every single one of us who ever set foot on campus is related to the massacre. --B 03:42, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the interest of not carrying on a conversation in two places, I have replied at User talk:B. --B 06:30, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Citation and Links

See the "For full disclosure" section again, thanks. Infinitelink 00:58, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]