User talk:GunnarBonk

Northern sculpin
Scientific classification
Domain:	Eukaryota
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Class:	Actinopterygii
Order:	Scorpaeniformes
Family:	Cottidae
Genus:	Icelinus
Species:	I. borealis
Binomial name
	Icelinus borealis; Gilbert, 1896

Northern sculpin
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Class:	Actinopterygii
Order:	Scorpaeniformes
Family:	Cottidae
Genus:	Icelinus
Species:	I. borealis
Binomial name
	Icelinus borealis; Gilbert, 1896

Speedy deletion nomination of Icelinus borealis

Hello GunnarBonk,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Icelinus borealis for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 05:08, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, I just couldn't figure out the speciesbox template, since the genus didn't have any articles about any of its species. GunnarBonk (talk) 05:10, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, If you need a hand (with getting started on articles such as Icelinus borealis), then let me know on my talk page. It can be hard to get started but once you find your feet you'll be fine. I will take a look at what do do about the speciesbox and get back to you. Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 05:13, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can experiment in you sandbox in case you were not aware. Look right at the top of your screen where your username is and click on the "sandbox" and you can practice editting there. 05:16, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

To create a speciesbox will require a bit of messing around and I'm a bit short on time. Below is a modified taxobox that you could use and just edit the binomial name as you need to for other species in the genus. Could you please check the taxonomy for me and make sure I've got the correct order/family etc... What you you think? Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 05:26, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creating the autotaxobox and hence the speciesbox was a bit easier than I remember, one is created below the existing taxobox, either will work fine now. I'm going to add it to the original article and you can go from there. Cheers. Hughesdarren (talk) 06:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I went to sleep shortly after I left the last message, thank you so much for the work you did. I'll fill out the rest of the page with the information I can collect from FishBase. I'll try playing around in the sandbox later as well. GunnarBonk (talk) 15:21, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, if you need a hand with stuff like this then let me know. Regards 23:45, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Arcade Gannon

Hello, GunnarBonk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arcade Gannon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Arcade Gannon

Hello, GunnarBonk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arcade Gannon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Txiki Begiristain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basque Country. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Chatto reversion

Hello GunnarBonk, you reverted my edit of Andrew Chatto presumably on the basis that a considerable amount was trimmed; the original creator of the article cited a great number of primary sources, mainly through FreeBMD, which I thought it better to direct to the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography entry on the article subject, which is a reliable published source and not the product of the article creator's original research. I hope this results in restoration of what I considered to be a very constructive edit- much more work needs to be done on the article, particularly with regard to the business practices of Chatto & Windus, which would better be included in that article than Andrew Chatto's own. Best regards 92.24.233.169 (talk) 00:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for leaving a message! I'm very new to using Twinkle, and I made a rash decision. You were correct in removing so much original research, and I always like to see an article's quality being improved. I'm sorry for the misunderstanding. Happy editing! GunnarBonk (talk) 00:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem at all; if people like you didn't vigilantly check all the changes who knows what could be done to articles... doesn't bear thinking about! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.233.169 (talk) 00:37, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Lol Globcheev (talk) 18:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]