User talk:Hagerman
 | This user may have departed Wikipedia. Hagerman has not edited Wikipedia since December 25, 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
My inactive conversations are routinely archived. Please select an archive to view the history: |
| Archive 1 |
ACC Account Creation Interface
[edit]This is a note to the account creation interface approvers that I requested access to the tool. Best, Hagerman(talk) 05:03, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on irc and the mailing list. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. FunPika 11:43, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! Hagerman(talk) 01:59, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Wikiversity:Bots
[edit]There is a current discussion about changes to the v:Wikiversity:Bots policy. As a bot operator we would welcome your input at v:Wikiversity_talk:Bots#Update. --mikeu talk 15:17, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, we've noticed that the bot that you operate at Wikiversity has been inactive since 2007. The bot flag has been temporarily removed for inactivity per changes in the Wikiversity:Bots policy. The flag will restored if we notice that the bot has resumed productive activity, or if you request restoration from a bureaucrat. The community does not consider it a big deal to re-grant this right to a trusted contributor. Thank you for the bot contributions that you have made in the past, and we hope that you will consider becoming active again. --mikeu talk 17:01, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
File:User Hagerman Is Soaked.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:User Hagerman Is Soaked.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
The article Little Mad Guy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Yes, I know it's a Chinese movie from 1982 and I'm an English-speaker searching the internet in 2019, but I still can't find anything to verify that this is a notable film. None of the personnel are notable, and I can't find any "Golden Heart Awards" existing in China. No reviews located, no Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:07, 11 January 2019 (UTC)