User talk:Halcyon76

May 2019

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. NJA | talk 15:19, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Halcyon76 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't realize that the old username broke the guidelines on Wikipedia, so now I would like to change it to something appropriate. I don't understand this block for vandalism. I have not committed any vandalism on Wikipedia, at least not knowingly.ButtSack76 (talk) 03:57, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Username issue resolved. N.J.A. | talk 21:11, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've merged your requests, as only one is needed. 331dot (talk) 09:54, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've renamed your account from ButtSack76 and someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 09:57, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As the username issue is resolved, and to now consider your unblock request, you will need to provide insight for reviewing administrators on why the block is not necessary. To assist in doing this it’d help to set out some topics or articles you propose to edit and how you believe you can make useful contributions. Please be specific, yet concise. Thanks. N.J.A. | talk 11:51, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NJA: You blocked the editor for the username violation and as a vandalism only account. I don't see any vandalism; is there something I'm missing?-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:08, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It seems I got carried away in the moment. I will agree this user’s request now that the username issue is resolved. Thanks. N.J.A. | talk 21:11, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]