User talk:HamatoKameko/Archive5

User:LudaSaphire

I'm very new to Wikipedia so before tackling a big project -- I want to re-create Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal (a law firm I worked at when in law school) -- I decided to just create a new page on a band I know in Chicago, Josh and the Empty Pockets and then make some modest updates to get the hang of this. I haven't gotten any feedback, but then I saw in the log for this page, I notice that you "marked Josh and the Empty Pockets patrolled". What does that mean, and did I do something wrong? Thanks!--Ludasaphire (talk) 17:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

"Marked Patrolled" just means that another editor, usually someone who goes through dozens if not hundreds of "new pages" in a sitting, checked out your page, either didn't see any problems or tagged it appropriately for cleanup (or deletion in the case of vandalism), and marked it "patrolled" so other editors could skip over it while doing new page patrol themselves. You didn't do anything wrong! Although, from the looks of your law firm page, you might want to have a look at at the article regarding Neutral Point of View, as the page reads like an advertisement more than a neutral article. -HamatoKameko (talk) 17:26, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

CMiC Enterprise, CMiC Project Management, CMiC Software

Please be aware that articles about software products do not qualify for speedy deletion under CSD:A7. I have no doubt that these articles will fail notability if nominated for AfD, but we can't jump the gun and speedy it without process. Please review CSD:A7 before nominating more pages. Thank you! Owen× ☎ 17:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, very much

The article Michelle Brooke, which you marked for speedy deletion, is part of a series on So You Think You Can Dance contestants, and as such appears to be notable enough to warrant the article. While the article has issues that need to be addressed, I don't see any reason for it to be deleted, and I've removed the tag. -HamatoKameko (talk) 23:32, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Michelle Brooke --Eduardo Corrêa (talk) 23:46, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Anytime. :D -HamatoKameko (talk) 23:49, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

CSD:G11

You seem very eager to have articles speedy deleted, in many cases too eager. Your application of CSD:G11 ("spam") is often incorrect. An article which presents a person, company or product in a favourable light may suffer from a POV problem, and should be fixed, not deleted. G11 should only be used when the article can only serve as advertisement, with little or no encyclopedic content.

Please check your prior contributions to see many examples of pages you nominated for speedy deletion under CSD:G11 that were not deleted. Such nominations are harmful; they distract admins away from more important tasks, but more importantly, they discourage editors from improving the article.

In the past I have commented on your incorrect use of CSD:A7. Please pay more attention to your application of speedy tags. Concentrate on quality, versus quantity of your work here. Thank you, Owen× ☎ 13:05, 22 February 2009 (UTC)