User talk:Happythoughts77

Speedy deletion nomination of Bello Moi

Hello Happythoughts77,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bello Moi for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NHCLS (talk) 20:58, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created - leave that to other editors. Merci beaucoup! NHCLS (talk) 21:10, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bello Moi

Hello Happythoughts77,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bello Moi for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NHCLS (talk) 21:10, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of article

The article Bello Moi has been deleted. There were two reasons for this, either of which alone would have been sufficient grounds for speedy deletion:

1. As stated above, it was purely promotional. Wikipedia is not a free advertising service, and editors who persist in editing in a promotional way may be blocked from editing.
2. The contents of the article have previously been published on various web sites, such as blog.crueltyfreeconsumer.com/category/bello-moi, meaning that it was an infringement of copyright. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:29, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Dec 2014

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. War wizard90 (talk) 03:04, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Happythoughts77. Thank you. War wizard90 (talk) 03:40, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia only for promotion, continuing to do so after being informed that it is unacceptable, and also because of abuse of multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:33, 14 December 2014 (UTC)